Arkansas court overturns ban on teacher-student sex

LITTLE ROCK, Arkansas Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:14pm EDT

Related Topics

LITTLE ROCK, Arkansas (Reuters) - The Arkansas Supreme Court struck down a state law on Thursday that banned teachers from having sex with students under age 21, overturning a sexual assault conviction against a former teacher who had a consensual relationship with an 18-year-old student.

In a 4-3 decision, the court vacated the conviction against David Paschal, a former teacher in the Elkins School District in northern Arkansas, because the girl was legally an adult during the relationship.

For about five months, Paschal, then 36, had a consensual sexual relationship with the female student at Elkins High School, according to court documents. The girl had been a student of Paschal in tenth and eleventh grades, and she later became his classroom aide and offered to babysit his children.

The two began their affair in 2009, when she was a senior, and Paschal was arrested the following year.

In 2011, he was convicted of four counts of second-degree sexual assault and one count of bribing a witness at a jury trial last year. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison.

"Regardless of how we feel about Paschal's conduct, which could correctly be referred to as reprehensible, we cannot abandon our duty to uphold the rule of law when a case presents distasteful facts," Chief Justice Jim Hannah wrote in the decision.

The issue presented to the court hinged on "Paschal's fundamental right to engage in private, consensual, noncommercial acts of sexual intimacy with an adult. We hold that it does," the majority said.

In the dissent, Justice Robert Brown wrote that the decision "minimizes the role of a teacher."

He also argued that the state has a general interest in the ensuring the welfare of children in school against teachers who abuse positions of trust and authority.

"For the majority to say that such authority vanishes when a student turns 18 ignores the realities of the student-teacher relationship," Brown wrote. "I cannot agree that a teacher has a right protected by our constitution to engage in sexual contact with a student."

Aaron Sadler, spokesman for Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel, said the state was evaluating its options, including possibly seeking a rehearing.

"We respect the court's decision, although we disagree with it," he said.

(Editing By Corrie MacLaggan and Cynthia Johnston)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
FatherJames wrote:
At 18 the criminal charges should not apply. However… if the student taking classes from that teacher, the teacher should be fired…

Mar 29, 2012 9:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ralphooo wrote:
No teacher should ever have sex with a high school student. If it takes place after the student has reached legal adulthood, it is still just as wrong, but it might not necessarily be illegal. The teacher should lose his or her job and credentials, and should be charged with any related lawbreaking. I think that would be a sufficient penalty, always assuming everything was really consensual, and the young person was not harmed.

Unfortunately, laws have to draw some arbitrary lines.

Mar 29, 2012 10:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tonysam wrote:
Boneheaded decision. The reason such conduct was criminalized in the first place was fear on the part of school districts of sexual harassment lawsuits. When I was in high school, it was perfectly legal for teachers to date high school students. It’s not allowed now, and for good reason. Favoritism, lack of appropriate boundaries, disruption of the school environment are three reasons I can think of why this kind of behavior cannot be allowed in schools.

Mar 30, 2012 3:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.