Iraq warns against arming Syrian rebels

BAGHDAD Sun Apr 1, 2012 9:54am EDT

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq on Sunday warned Arab countries against supplying weapons and financial support to rebels fighting to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, saying such moves risked escalating the conflict.

"We want to extinguish the fire by draining the sources of force, we want to find a peaceful solution to the crisis," Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki told reporters at a press conference.

"We reject any arming of the opposition, we reject attempts to bring down the regime by force, because it will leave a wider crisis in the region," he added.

Maliki made the appeal as foreign ministers from around 70 countries including the United States and leading European and Gulf powers met in Istanbul to try to agree how best to support the Syrian opposition.

Iraq's Shi'ite-led government has adopted a more moderate position on Syria than Sunni Gulf neighbors Qatar and Saudi Arabia which have advocated supplying arms to the Syrian rebels.

If Assad were to lose power, Iraqi Shi'ite leaders are worried their own country's fragile sectarian balance among Shi'ite, Sunni and Kurds could be unsettled, especially if a hardline Sunni regime replaced the Assad government.

Both Iraq and Syria have close ties to Shi'ite power Iran, which is caught in a regional power struggle for more influence with Sunni Arab Gulf countries.

At a summit in Baghdad last week, Arab League members agreed to endorse a six-point peace plan drawn up by special United Nations-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan, which calls for a ceasefire and talks with the opposition.

On Sunday, Western and Arab nations met in Istanbul for the "Friends of Syria" Conference, seeking to exert more pressure on Assad who accepted the plan but has so far failed to implement it.

The participants are skeptical of his promises to end a year of bloodshed, but are not expected to agree to arm rebels or to fully recognize an opposition council.

"This conference will only hear the same voice that calls for armament," Maliki said.

The Saudi foreign minister said on Saturday it was a "duty" to arm the Syrian rebels, but Western powers are anxious not to be drawn into a possibly intractable conflict.

Despite Annan's mediation efforts, violence has raged unabated. Opposition activists reported at least 16 people killed on Sunday, mostly in clashes in northwestern and eastern Syria.

Syrian media derided the Istanbul meeting, with the ruling Baath party newspaper describing it as "a regional and international scramble to find ways of killing more Syrians and destroying their society and country, to reach the broad goal of weakening Syria".

Iraq itself is trying to rebuild after years of war following the 2003 invasion that toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein. Insurgents and suicide bombers often crossed the porous border from Syria during the height of the country's conflict.

(Writing by Suadad al-Salhy; Editing by Andrew Osborn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
poidog wrote:
it is so strange that all the neocons never understood the dynamics between Islamic sects. What is going on in Syria and why the Sunni dominated governments want to support the refellion is that it is sunni versus shiite. As was the case in Iraq when we handed power to the Iranian sponsored shiites. If the Syrian regime goes down it will be controlled by Sunnis…the same group that we are fighting in Afghanistan and that led the attack on 9/11. The Christians there will be slaughtered as they have been in Iraq and Egypt. My take…let them kill each other off and stay out of it.

Apr 01, 2012 9:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
YellowDevil wrote:
@ poidog: Actually you seem to fail the basic understanding of said Islamic sects. Guess that makes you a “Neocon” as well. Bashar al-Assad’s family comes from the Alawa sect, a self-described mystical sect that draws many traditions from Shia. However, the governing party is Ba’ath, or the Socialist Arab party that Saddam was also a part of (which in turn has early roots with the Nazi party). I don’t know why the government Sunnis wants to “support” the rebellion, because that would work against their own interest of staying in power. Unlike say Afghanistan where tribal roots run particularly deep and contrary to a centralized authority, Arab states such as Syria use the Ba’ath party to cut through Shi’ite/Sunni/other religious or tribal ties. So really this has no comparison to Afghanistan, who aren’t even Arab and do not share the same language.

Apr 02, 2012 11:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures