COLUMN-YOUR MONEY: Tax breaks for underwater homeowners

Mon Apr 2, 2012 11:56am EDT

By Amy Feldman

NEW YORK, April 2 (Reuters) - About 11 million U.S. homeowners owe more than their homes are worth, according to real estate data firm CoreLogic, and while taxes may not be the first thing they think about in deciding what to do, all the various options have tax consequences.

Until the end of this year, at least, there is a tax break for homeowners who negotiate debt reduction with their lenders.

Some of these "underwater" owners may qualify for principal reduction through the massive mortgage foreclosure settlement announced in February. Others may pursue short sales, in which the home is sold for less than the bank is owed, or wind up in foreclosure.

But those whose lenders cancel their debt would ordinarily face the tax man, because cancellation of debt, including mortgage reduction, is generally taxable. That means if you get your mortgage reduced by $100,000 and you're in the 28 percent tax bracket, you'd owe $28,000 in federal taxes on the "income" you received when your debt was forgiven.

Typically, the only way to avoid those taxes is to declare bankruptcy or to claim insolvency, which does not require a bankruptcy filing but still requires that your debts outweigh your assets. Being foreclosed in a state like California, which has "non-recourse" rules that prohibit lenders from coming after you for extra cash after they've taken your house, also exempts one from taxes.

A special federal tax break to help ailing homeowners, put in place in 2007, allows them to exclude up to $2 million in forgiven mortgage debt from their income. To qualify, that debt has to be for your primary home - sorry, no vacation homes or investment properties.

With the tax break slated to expire in nine months, if you're currently sinking under the weight of your home, there's a reason to move quickly. No one can accurately foresee whether the provision will be renewed by Congress, and dealing with underwater real estate takes time.

"These problems are now winding their way through the final stages, and that's where the tax part comes up," says Larry McKoy, a certified public accountant and partner at Dixon Hughes Goodman, in Glen Allen, Virginia.


Even for this year, while that special tax break is in effect, there are complications. Most important, only the funds that you spent buying or improving your home count. So if you took extra cash out of your house during a refinancing or with a home-equity loan, spent it on vacations or on your kids' college educations and then ran into trouble, you're out of luck. If you put part of the money into your home and spent the rest elsewhere, you'll need to be able to track those amounts.

Another huge issue: Not all states take their cue from the feds, so even with the federal tax break in effect, you might still owe state income taxes on the canceled debt.

Principal reductions are relatively straightforward for tax purposes. You will receive a 1099-C form, for cancellation of debt, from your lender in the tax year the deal is done. Thus if you renegotiated your debt and got your principal reduced in 2011, you should have received this tax form already.


Foreclosures and short sales can get more complex. Although you may think you've finished the deal, if you live in a "recourse" state, in which the bank can come after you for the amount you owe beyond what the asset is worth, you may remain on the hook for years after the fact. In 41 states and the District of Columbia, lenders can sue for the balance of the debt long after the house is gone.

(The website HelocBasics has a list of the non-recourse states:)

In cases like that, whether you gave up your home through a short sale or lost it to foreclosure, there is no official debt cancellation until you get an agreement to that effect or until the statute of limitations runs out, and that can take years.

"People think the short sale will wave a magic wand, and make the bank go away," says Bill Smith, a managing director in the national tax office of accounting firm CBIZ MHM. "The banks aren't necessarily pursuing the collection, but they don't have any real incentive not to keep it. It could hang over your head for 20 years."

Say, for example, that your home is worth $500,000, and you owe the bank $700,000. You put your house on the market and you get an offer of $500,000. You take that offer to the bank and it's accepted.

But if you live in a recourse state, before you sign the deal, you'd better negotiate away that $200,000 with the lender.

"There are deals coming together," says McKoy, the accountant. "The homeowner might say, 'What if I scrape together $60,000, and you go away?' Then the lender counters. That's going on every day. You're trying to negotiate it away."

Only after the statute of limitations on collecting a debt runs out is it actually considered canceled for tax purposes. Only then - and it could be years after the fact - would you receive the tax form 1099-C showing the canceled debt, on which you could well owe taxes.

Whether or not you want to think about taxes while you're struggling to keep your home, McKoy says, "the tax law has a game plan for you."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
breezinthru wrote:
Not to worry. The government will continue to encourage underwater home-owners to negotiate new contracts the banks. Most of those underwater properties were purchased in the years immediately preceding the peak in home prices. Those homes were registered with MERS and neither the securitizers or MERS can now prove that they own most of the mortgages.

If home values had continued to climb, no one would have ever questioned whether anyone actually owned the mortgage after the original documents were destroyed and their digital remains were sliced and diced, bundled, sold and hedged.

It’s to the bank’s advantage to quickly and quietly refinance as many of those MERS loans as possible before people figure it out and starting filing discoveries and Quiet Titles.

The banks know that they can count on their friends in Congress to pass a law that encourages their constituents to do what the banks want.

Skeptical? How often does that happen when it comes to taxes?

At a hastily financed closing conducted by a notary public in the customer’s home on actual paper, the unfortunate victims would be purchasing their home for more money than it is worth and providing the servicer with an actual mortgage for which they now actually have paperwork… in exchange for a couple percentage points on the loan.

If you live in one of twelve, “non-recourse” states like I do, refinancing also removes your mortgage from “non-recourse” protection.

Neither the bank or the government warned anyone about that when earlier this year when servicers of underwater loans backed by Freddie and Fannie suddenly offered refinancing at today’s lower interest rates, plus a little cream.

This is not a pure Banks v. the Government because the major banks joined forces with Freddie and Fannie to create MERS… and Freddie and Fannie have gone from not quite government-affiliated to wholly owned by the government…

and the real estate market languishes on.

Apr 02, 2012 4:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.