Fed watchdog finds no Watergate, Iraq weapons link

WASHINGTON Tue Apr 3, 2012 2:43pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve did not help the Watergate burglars get cash, stonewall congressional inquiries in the 1970s political scandal or help Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein get a $5.5 billion loan to purchase weapons in the 1980s, the agency's inspector general said in a report posted on the Fed's website on Tuesday.

The release touches on subjects seldom associated with the U.S. central bank. It comes after an inquiry that grew out of allegations made by U.S. Representative Ron Paul, a Fed critic and Republican presidential candidate, at a congressional hearing in February 2010.

Following the hearing, then-House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank asked the Fed to investigate what, if any, inappropriate role the central bank played in the Watergate scandal that brought down the presidency of Richard Nixon or weapons purchases by Saddam Hussein.

"We did not find any evidence of undue political interference with Federal Reserve officials related to the 1972 Watergate burglary or Iraq weapons purchases during the 1980s," the Fed's inspector general told Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in a letter dated March 30.

"Specifically, regarding the first Watergate allegation, we did not find any evidence of undue political interference with or improper actions by Federal Reserve officials related to the cash found on the Watergate burglars."

The inspector general's office operates independently of the Fed. It said in its report that the Fed's general counsel reviewed the findings and "stated that our report confirmed past statements by Federal Reserve officials."

(Reporting By Dave Clarke; Editing by Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
WallaBingBang wrote:
I am sure the inspector general is giving us an very independent and unbiased report here. I trust them.

Apr 03, 2012 9:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
rkm1 wrote:
When I google “Office of Inspector General”, I find that there are quite a few of them. The best scenario I can make is that the FED’s own OIG investigated the FED and found no wrong doing. Hmmm… sounds more official than it really is. Dave Clarke and Margaret Chadbourn should confirm which OIG they are referring to? Was this taxpayer funded?

Moreover, such a timely moment to publish a silly article; isn’t it??

How bout an answer…

Apr 06, 2012 6:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.