Appeals court upholds California affirmative action ban

SAN FRANCISCO Mon Apr 2, 2012 11:51pm EDT

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court upheld California's ban on the use of affirmative action in university admissions on Monday, reaffirming that public schools cannot base admission on race, gender or ethnicity.

The ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholding so-called Proposition 209 comes as affirmative action resurfaces as a live issue at the top of the U.S. legal system.

"Today's ruling is good news for everyone who values fairness and equal opportunity, because Proposition 209 guarantees fair treatment for everyone, regardless of skin color, sex, or ethnic ancestry," Ralph W. Kasarda, who argued the case for the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation, said in a statement.

Proposition 209, passed by voters over 15 years ago, has prompted fierce debate for years in California. Opponents said it narrowed opportunities for women and minorities to succeed in the state. Supporters countered it simply created a system where individual ability was rewarded.

The plaintiffs in the California challenge argued that the number of African American, Latino and Native American freshmen at UCLA and U.C. Berkeley dropped by over 50 percent in the wake of Proposition 209.

However, a lower court judge dismissed the challenge, and on Monday a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit affirmed that ruling.

The panel wrote it had already established a precedent on the issue when it upheld the affirmative action bar in a previous opinion in the 1990s, and said prior 9th Circuit caselaw had already taken falling minority enrollment into account.

An attorney for the plaintiffs, a group of high school and college students, could not immediately be reached late on Monday.

The issue of affirmative action will ultimately go to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed in February to decide if a state university may consider an applicant's race to achieve a more diverse student body, revisiting in an election year a divisive social issue it last addressed nine years ago.

In the case now under consideration, the high court agreed to hear an appeal by a white female applicant who was denied undergraduate admission in 2008 to the University of Texas at Austin. The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in the case in its upcoming term that begins in October.

(Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ARJTurgot2 wrote:
tick, tick tick, time is counting down on a wedge issue that both parties have exploited magnificently.

Apr 03, 2012 8:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
explorer08 wrote:
In the ideal the court is correct. Only merit should count. However, the reality is that humans are born discriminatory. It’s in our nature. Only law can prevent discrimination. Or, at least, slow it down.

Apr 03, 2012 8:54am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.