First Marines in Australia under new security deal

Tue Apr 3, 2012 7:55pm EDT

1 of 5. United States Marines of Fox Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment complete Australian Customs paperwork as they arrive at a Royal Australian Air Force Base in Darwin April 4, 2012. Some 200 U.S. Marines arrived in Australia on a six-month deployment on Tuesday, the first of 2,500 troops expected to rotate through a de facto base in the port of Darwin as part of plans to deepen the U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific.

Credit: Reuters/Australian Department of Defence/Handout

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Some 200 U.S. Marines arrived in Australia late on Tuesday for a six-month deployment, the first of 2,500 troops expected to rotate through a de facto base in Darwin as part of plans to deepen the U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific.

The deployment of Marines to northern Australia has sparked concern in China, where officials have questioned whether it is part of a larger U.S. strategy aimed at encircling it and thwarting the country's rise as a global power.

"The world needs to essentially come to grips with the rise of China, the rise of India, the move of strategic and political and economic influence to our part of the world," Australia Defence Minister Stephen Smith said in Darwin.

"And we need to ensure that we do that in a way in which the international community responds to that change, manages that change," he said, adding he believed having the Marines in Australia would enhance those efforts.

The tropical port of Darwin is located 500 miles from Indonesia, allowing the Marines to respond quickly to any humanitarian and security issues in Southeast Asia, where tensions have risen due to disputes over sovereignty in the South China Sea.

When the deployment was announced last November by President Barack Obama and Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, they cast it as a way to increase bilateral military cooperation and training and said it was not an attempt to isolate China.

"The notion that we fear China is mistaken. The notion that we are looking to exclude China is mistaken," Obama said, adding that "we welcome a rising, peaceful China."


James Hardy, Asia Pacific Editor for IHS Jane's Defence Weekly, said that while the deployment was small, it would give the United States more options in Asia, where it already has bases in South Korea, Okinawa and Guam, as well as strategic relationships with Singapore and the Philippines.

"A company of marines (rising to 2,500) is a very small footprint, and compared to a permanent homeporting or homebasing of naval or aviation assets, which the U.S. could have proposed and the Australians could have accepted, this has quite a limited force projection capability, and so can be seen as a modest statement of intent," Hardy said.

The first group of Marines, from the 3rd Marine Regiment based in Hawaii, will engage in exercises with the Australian Defence Forces and also will travel to other nations in the region for training and exercises, a Marine Corps spokesman said.

The force is expected to grow in size over time to become a 2,500-person Marine Air Ground Task Force, the spokesman said. It is expected to be a rotational force, with different units moving through for short periods of time rather than being based in Australia permanently.

"This is completely irrelevant militarily, but quite important as a signal and that's why it is valued in the region," said a diplomat from the Asia-Pacific region.

Like China, Australia is looking to develop its military capabilities to reflect its increasing economic power and is focusing on its northwest coast, where its offshore oil and gas sector is booming.

(Reporting By David Alexander in Washington, James Grubel in Canberra and Lincoln Feast in Sydney; Editing by Bill Trott and John Mair)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
majkmushrm wrote:
Yeah, with peaceful being defined as doing what we tell you to.

Apr 03, 2012 5:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ELH_HUN10 wrote:
Wow, being transferred from Hawaii to Australia. Those two sites were very desirable R&R sites 45 years ago. The few, the proud, the lucky. There were about a 1/2 dozen other R&R sites back then. They will probably have a joint training exercise at each of them. It is a tough job, but someone has to do it. Semper Fi.

Apr 03, 2012 5:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Austell wrote:
This is very VERY bad for Australias reputation…

Our global image has already suffered immensely from being tied to US military interests in the past 10 years or more, and this is another step in the wrong direction.

Australian people are nothing like americans, and have very little respet for them in general, especially their politics.

This is a political deal that no one in Australia supports.

It’s depressing to realize that after you tick that box, they can do whatever the hell they want to your country and your culture for the next 4 years!

It’s things like this that make you realize how little democracy there is in Australia.

If you asked the public if they wanted this, you would get a big fat NO!

And Julia Gillard knows this for a fact.

Apr 03, 2012 10:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

A tourist takes a plunge as she swims at Ngapali Beach, a popular tourist site, in the Thandwe township of the Rakhine state, October 6, 2013. Picture taken October 6, 2013. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun (MYANMAR - Tags: SOCIETY) - RTR3FOI0

Where do you want to go?

We look at when to take trips, budget considerations and the popularity of multigenerational family travel.   Video