Judge tosses Happy Meal lawsuit against McDonald's

SAN FRANCISCO Wed Apr 4, 2012 7:26pm EDT

Two McDonald's Happy Meal with toy watches fashioned after the characters Donkey and Puss in Boots from the movie ''Shrek Forever After'' are pictured in Los Angeles June 22, 2010. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

Two McDonald's Happy Meal with toy watches fashioned after the characters Donkey and Puss in Boots from the movie ''Shrek Forever After'' are pictured in Los Angeles June 22, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mario Anzuoni

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A San Francisco judge on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit against McDonald's over the restaurant chain's marketing of its signature Happy Meals, according to court documents.

McDonald's was accused of unfairly using toys to lure children into its restaurants. The proposed class-action lawsuit in a California state court sought to stop the company from using free toys to promote its Happy Meals in the Golden State.

The Happy Meal has been a huge hit for McDonald's -- making the company one of the world's largest toy distributors -- and spawning me-too offerings at most other fast-food chains.

But it also has come under fire from public health officials, parents and lawmakers who are frustrated with rising childhood obesity rates and weak anti-obesity efforts from restaurant operators, which are largely self-regulated.

Plaintiff Monet Parham, a mother of two, was represented by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nutrition advocacy group. CSPI executive director Michael Jacobson said CSPI would discuss the possibility of an appeal with Parham.

"In time, the practice of using toys to market junk food will seem as inappropriate and anachronistic as lead paint, child labor and asbestos," Jacobson said.

Court documents show that Judge Richard Kramer dismissed Parham's claims on Wednesday, without giving her a chance to file an amended lawsuit. The documents do not contain any details of Kramer's legal analysis.

McDonald's spokeswoman Danya Proud said the company was pleased with Kramer's decision.

"We are proud of our Happy Meals and will vigorously defend our brand, our reputation and our food," Proud said.

The case in Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco is Monet Parham, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated vs. McDonald's Corp. et al., 10-506178.

(Reporting By Dan Levine; Editing by Gary Hill and M.D. Golan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
A waste of every ones time. I hope whoever brought this case to court pays dearly for it, and puts a stop to such frivolous cases

Apr 04, 2012 7:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Gee, Cracker Jacks should stop putting surprises in the box because it causes kids to want them. Just tell you kid NO for a change. They need to learn the lesson that they can’t always have what they want.

Apr 04, 2012 7:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
The person who brought the suit should have to pay McDonalds lawyer fees and court cost.

Apr 04, 2012 8:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

A tourist takes a plunge as she swims at Ngapali Beach, a popular tourist site, in the Thandwe township of the Rakhine state, October 6, 2013. Picture taken October 6, 2013. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun (MYANMAR - Tags: SOCIETY) - RTR3FOI0

Where do you want to go?

We look at when to take trips, budget considerations and the popularity of multigenerational family travel.   Video