Sponsored Links

China steps up pressure to prevent any attack on Iran

Related Topics

BEIJING, April 6 | Fri Apr 6, 2012 3:59am EDT

BEIJING, April 6 (Reuters) - A senior Chinese diplomat said on Friday an attack on Iran would invite devastating retaliation that would envelop the region and destabilise the global economic recovery, and added that the international community had to restrain itself from war.

Iran is locked in a dispute with the West over its nuclear programme, which Iran says is for peaceful purposes.

Israel and the United States have threatened military action against Iran unless it abandons activities which the West suspects are intended to develop nuclear weapons.

China, which has close energy and trade ties with Iran, has urged a negotiated solution to the dispute and long opposed the use of force or unilateral sanctions on Iran.

The comments by Chen Xiaodong, head of the Foreign Ministry's West Asia and North African affairs division, was China's strongest warning yet not to use force to resolve the dispute.

"If force is used on Iran, it will certainly incur retaliation, cause an even greater military clash, worsen turmoil in the region, threaten the security of the Strait of Hormuz and other strategic passages, drive up global oil prices and strike a blow at the world economic recovery," he said.

"There may be 10,000 reasons to go to war but you cannot remedy the terrible consequences of plunging the people into misery and suffering and the collapse of society and the economy caused by the flames of war," Chen said on a web chat hosted by Communist Party mouthpiece the People's Daily.

Speculation is growing that Israel could launch some form of strike against Iranian nuclear installations, which Israel sees as a threat to its existence.

During a visit to Beijing last month, Israel's foreign minister hinted it could launch a preemptive attack on Iran despite repeated calls by China to allow diplomacy to take its course.

Chen said the pressing task was for all sides to restrain themselves and resume dialogue as soon as possible.

"The international community has a responsibility to restrain itself from war," he said.

More talks between Iran and world powers are expected to take place this month in an attempt to reach a compromise.

The most recent talks failed in January 2011 after Iran refused to suspend its uranium enrichment work, as demanded by the United Nations in several resolutions. (Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Robert Birsel)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
roberto2002 wrote:
I am surprised China has not taken a harder line or more impassioned response than it has so far. Unlike the US, which gets most of its oil from Canada, Mexico and Venezuela, most of China’s oil come from the Middle East. In the event of war leading to a closing of the Strait of Hormuz, China’s economy will be hurt far more than that of the US. A prolonged closure of the Straits would devastate China’s economy and the livelihood of its citizens. Given the stakes, I would have expected China to flex its muscles much harder to stop any possibility of war in the region. My guess is that the Chinese still prefer the “quiet” way of diplomacy, and is privately lobbying hard at the US & Israel, rather than do so publicly, as it feels making the US “lose face” would make it much harder to accomplish Chinese interests.

Apr 06, 2012 11:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
apophthegm wrote:
China represents the world’s ultimate hypocrite (followed closely by Russia’s rabid dog in the Kremlin, Vlad “the impaler” Putin). It pursues its enemies relentlessly while concomitantly advising the West to exhibit restraint in absorbing any threats and attacks with resignation.
I wonder what the response and rhetoric of Chen Xiaodong would be if Iran’s criminal operations against the people and strategic interests of the West were directed against the people and strategic interests of China?
Make no mistake, China’s Government is brutal. The Chinese administration even rapes, tortures and murders sections of its own population by the thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, for merely thinking anti-CCP thoughts. China has no concept of minority rights (let alone human rights) so, for example, the Falun Gong suffers such abuses daily and Tibetans and ‘recalcitrant’ intellectuals also suffer the same fate. However, criminal governments come and go and even 2000 years ago Christ was saying “give unto Caesar that which is Ceasar’s but give unto God that which is God’s. The sentiment is lost on the Chinese Government because the cupidity of the CCP means it wants ‘the lot’ and refuses therefore to make any distinction.
Suffering can be caused in many ways and it is ‘motive and intention’ that prevails over outcome when judging the behaviour of nations. China’s turpitude (including that of Russia) permits its diplomats to attribute greater priority to strategic interests than to humanitarian considerations. This is manifest in their contrived display of rational and composed posturing in UN meetings as they habitually exercise their veto to block humanitarian resolutions. The most recent example of this is the UN Security Council resolutions on Syria where these psychopathic diplomats exercised their veto, impervious to the resulting rape, torture, murder and slaughter of Syrian citizens.
China and Russia apparently believe that they each deserve to occupy a world leadership role but on the basis of their unremittingly ignominious conduct they long ago forfeited any right to respect and deserve, in fact, to be marginalised. The logical consequence of this is that, where possible, they should be denied any reward by way of appointment to positions of influence in important institutions associated with world forums.

Apr 06, 2012 12:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Drainlizzard wrote:
Will China make any real attempt to get Iran to resolve the issues via diplomatic (non stalling measures) solutions or, is it the truth that China just expects Iran’s enemies to just sit idle and let the maniacs who are the world’s largest sponsors of terrorism develop the bombs?

Apr 07, 2012 8:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.