North Korea says no longer bound by nuclear test moratorium

SEOUL Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:33pm EDT

Rockets are carried by military vehicles during a military parade to celebrate the centenary of the birth of North Korea's founder Kim Il-sung in Pyongyang on April 15, 2012, in this picture released by the North's KCNA news agency on April 16, 2012. REUTERS/KCNA

Rockets are carried by military vehicles during a military parade to celebrate the centenary of the birth of North Korea's founder Kim Il-sung in Pyongyang on April 15, 2012, in this picture released by the North's KCNA news agency on April 16, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/KCNA

Related Topics

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea on Tuesday dismissed a rebuke by the U.N. Security Council of its failed long-range rocket launch and said it was no longer bound by an agreement with the United States for a moratorium on missile and nuclear tests and arms inspection.

The Security Council on Monday condemned the North for Friday's rocket launch and warned of further action if Pyongyang carried out a nuclear test, reflecting concern that it may follow a pattern it set in 2009 with its second nuclear test.

"We resolutely and totally reject the unreasonable behavior of the UNSC to violate (our) legitimate right to launch satellites," the North said in a statement carried by the official KCNA news agency.

The U.N. action was masterminded by the United States with a hostile intent denying the North of its right to conduct peaceful space research, the statement said.

"As the U.S. violated the February 29 DPRK-U.S. agreement through its undisguised hostile acts, we will no longer be bound to it," the statement said, referring to a deal for a nuclear and missile test moratorium in return for food aid.

"We have thus become able to take necessary retaliatory measures, free from the agreement," the North said, without specifying what actions it will take.

The fate of a planned visit by international inspectors to the North's nuclear site under the February agreement is also in doubt since Pyongyang raised tensions by going ahead with the rocket launch against international warning.

Powers including the United States, Japan and South Korea said the launch was a long-range missile test disguised as a satellite launch in violation of existing Security Council resolutions that put Pyongyang under tough sanctions.

A senior U.S. military officer said on Tuesday that Washington was looking at "all options" as it sought to discourage the North from conducting a third nuclear test, in response to a question whether it would consider a surgical strike on the North's atomic test site.

North Korea has revealed work on a uranium enrichment program, which arms experts said could give it a second path to building nuclear weapons after its plutonium-based program at its Yongbyon complex was suspended under a now-defunct 2005 international disarmament deal.

U.S. and South Korean officials have said former U.S. President Bill Clinton considered the possibility of a surgical strike on Yongbyon at the height of a nuclear crisis in 1994 before Pyongyang struck an energy deal with Washington to suspend nuclear activities.

(Reporting by Ju-min Park, Choonsik Yoo and Jack Kim; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
AZWarrior wrote:
Let’s set the Wayback Machine to not long ago and review how our government has debt with nuclear proliferation.
“The North Koreans are too poor and stupid to design a nuclear device. ”
“Well OK, they can design but not build a nuclear device.”
“Well OK, but they can build a nuclear device but it won’t work. ”
“Well, OK, it worked but they can’t design a missile to cary it. ”
“Well, OK, they designed and built a missile that can carry a nuclear weapons but it won’t work. ”
Meanwhile, we hear from the government, “Iran is too poor and stupid to build a nuclear device any time soon…. ”
I think history shows it is the government that is too stupid to prevent the speed of nuclear weapons.

Apr 17, 2012 3:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Life1 wrote:
Azwarrior, the only way to stop proliferation is by banning nuclear weapons worldwide and creating a worldwide nuke free zone.

Since nobody has any intention of disarming any time soon, you can’t expect other countries to not build any out of a ‘civic duty’ to the world.

Leading by example is more important here than ever…

Apr 17, 2012 5:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.