Romney's remarks on limiting tax deductions draw fire

WASHINGTON Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:17pm EDT

Republican Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at the Celebration of American Values Leadership Forum during the National Rifle Association's (NRA) 141st Annual Meetings & Exhibits in St. Louis, Missouri, April 13, 2012. REUTERS/Tom Gannam

Republican Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at the Celebration of American Values Leadership Forum during the National Rifle Association's (NRA) 141st Annual Meetings & Exhibits in St. Louis, Missouri, April 13, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Tom Gannam

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Was it case of a politician being candid behind closed doors? Or was he merely leading a provocative discussion of tax proposals?

Those were the questions surrounding U.S. Republican Mitt Romney's presidential campaign on Monday, after he was overhead telling supporters at a private fundraiser in Florida over the weekend that he might seek to limit tax deductions for mortgages and eliminate the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

By Monday, Romney's campaign was scrambling to distance him from the comments, overheard by reporters from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal. And Democratic President Barack Obama's campaign - which has tried to cast Romney as having secret plan that would hurt the middle class - had found a new episode to drive that narrative.

During a conference call, aides said Romney he was simply throwing out ideas, not outlining policy when he said he would combine or eliminate many government departments, agencies and tax credits to help offset his proposal to slash all U.S. tax rates by 20 percent.

While not especially specific, Romney's comments did go much further in describing his plans than what he has outlined in public campaign appearances.

Romney told donors he would eliminate or limit the mortgage-interest tax deduction for second homes for those with high incomes, and probably would do the same for the state income-tax and state property-tax deductions now taken by millions of Americans, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Romney aides said he was merely responding to questions offering suggestions during the fundraiser.

"He's entitled to, I think, focus on the ideas he's actually proposed," said Jim Talent, a former Missouri senator and frequent Romney surrogate told reporters on the conference call.

The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee used Romney's comments to the conservative crowd in Florida to question the Republican's credibility.

Some Democrats focused on Romney's reluctance to reveal details about his vast fortune or specifics for what he would do as president.

Romney generally "has a credibility problem that is leading to a lack of trust across the political spectrum," said Ben LaBolt, Obama's spokesman at the campaign's Chicago headquarters.

WARNINGS ON TAX DEDUCTIONS

In Washington and beyond, Romney's comments set off discussions - and warnings - about the potential cost and impact of the tax measures he suggested.

Lawrence Yun, chief economist with the National Association of Realtors, said limiting the second home mortgage deduction was a "terrible idea."

Yun, whose group opposes any change in home mortgage interest deductions, said at most, such a move would raise about $5 billion a year in additional tax revenue but could hurt home sales. It "would be a terrible signal to send out there" just as the housing market is trying to recover, Yun said.

U.S. congressman Sander Levin, the ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, said a proposal "to eliminate the deductibility of property taxes is particularly reckless as we emerge from a housing-led recession.

"Because the value of the deduction is generally understood to be capitalized into the price of housing," Levin said, "eliminating the deduction risks a widespread drop in housing prices, further damaging fragile markets."

Cutting the mortgage deduction for second homes for all income groups could raise about $8 billion a year, according to an estimate by the Tax Policy Center.

Romney's floated proposal, because it would apply to high-earners only, therefore would raise less.

Economists across the spectrum would agree to kill that tax benefit, according Will McBride, an economist with the conservative-leaning Tax Foundation. "Every tax policy organization and economist agrees on that, except the few who are in the pay of the housing lobby," he said.

Congressional Republicans floated a similar idea last year in talks to cut the deficit, but a top Republican aide said it likely would be considered only in the context of broader tax changes.

Killing deductions for state and local income taxes probably would draw opposition from governors, many of whom are Republicans, according to Howard Gleckman, a scholar at the Tax Policy Center. "Every governor is completely terrified of losing the state and local tax deduction," Gleckman said.

The tax break, when applied for all income groups, is the country's fourth largest, and is estimated to cost the federal government $450 billion over five years, according to an estimate by the Democratic Center for American Progress.

TARGETING HUD, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Others focused on Romney's suggestions that he might eliminate HUD, raising questions about whether a Romney administration would target housing subsidies such as those the agency provides to low-income families.

HUD once was led by Romney's late father, George Romney.

"Things like Housing and Urban Development, which my dad was head of, that might not be around later," Romney told the Palm Beach crowd, according to NBC. "But I'm not going to actually go through these one by one. What I can tell you is, we've got far too many bureaucrats. I will send a lot of what happens in Washington back to the states."

Romney also told the Florida crowd he might reorganize the Department of Education, and said he realized the political perils of trimming the agency during his failed run for a U.S. Senate seat in 1994.

"The Department of Education: I will either consolidate with another agency, or perhaps make it a heck of a lot smaller. I'm not going to get rid of it entirely," Romney added. He explained that part of his reasoning behind preserving the agency was that it played a role in pushing back against teachers' unions, according to NBC.

Romney discussed campaign strategy during the Florida meeting, saying that for the November 6 election Republicans will need to woo Hispanics, who represent more than 20 percent of the voting population in many important swing states.

Polls indicate that Hispanics favor Obama over Romney by large margins.

(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by David Lindsey and Eric Walsh)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
notquiteover wrote:
romney sounds pretty eager to start firing all those people

Apr 16, 2012 10:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Blodwin wrote:
Limiting the tax deductions would affect earned income – but unearned income would be unaffected. We know who Romney favors.

Apr 16, 2012 12:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
matthewslyman wrote:
> “During a conference call, aides said Romney he was simply throwing out ideas, not outlining policy”

What’s not convincing about this? Which competent manager is afraid to discuss wild ideas – even those that never stand a chance of being implemented – if only for enlightening the discussion?

Where are the direct, word-for-word quotations – where are the recordings? Or are we only going to have these alleged Romney quotes third-hand from the Democratic National Committee???

Apr 17, 2012 4:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.