Troops pose with maimed Afghan insurgent bodies

BRUSSELS/WASHINGTON Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:44pm EDT

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta attends a news conference at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels April 18, 2012. REUTERS/Yves Herman

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta attends a news conference at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels April 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Yves Herman

Related Topics

BRUSSELS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. troops are seen posing with the maimed bodies of suspected Afghan insurgents in photos published on Wednesday, an incident that threatened to further fray U.S.-Afghan ties and prompted yet another apology from Washington for soldiers' misbehavior.

In one of the pictures, a U.S. paratrooper posed next to an unofficial patch placed beside a body that read "Zombie Hunter," while in another photo soldiers posed with Afghan police holding the severed legs of an insurgent bomber.

Two soldiers in another photo held a dead insurgent's hand with the middle finger raised.

U.S. officials quickly condemned the behavior seen in the pictures published by the Los Angeles Times.

While it was too soon to say whether the photos - which date from 2010 - would cause a violent backlash in Afghanistan, they extend a series of events that have embarrassed the White House and complicated President Barack Obama's South Asia strategy.

In recent months, a video circulated of Marines urinating on corpses that were apparently those of Afghan insurgents; U.S. troops burned copies of the Koran, the Muslim holy book, prompting riots; and a U.S. soldier left his base in a rural province and allegedly slaughtered 17 Afghan civilians.

In neighboring Pakistan, relations sunk to a new low after a disputed November incident in which a U.S. airstrike killed 24 Pakistani soldiers. Washington has not apologized in that case.

During a meeting of NATO allies in Brussels on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta apologized for the latest incident "on behalf of the Department of Defense and the U.S. government" and said "that behavior is unacceptable."

White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters aboard Air Force One as Obama flew to Ohio for an economic speech, "The conduct depicted in those photos is reprehensible."

Carney said Obama was briefed on the matter but he did not know whether the president had seen the photos, which the Los Angeles Times said it received from a soldier.

The incident dealt another blow to already tense U.S. and NATO ties with Afghanistan.

"That behavior that was depicted in those photos absolutely violates both our regulations and more importantly our core values," Panetta told a news conference, adding that the pictures were under investigation.

"I know that war is ugly and it's violent and I know that young people sometimes caught up in the moment make some very foolish decisions," he added. "I'm not excusing that behavior, but neither do I want these images to bring further injury to our people and to our relationship with the Afghan people."

POSSIBLE BACKLASH

The photos could stir up more anti-Western sentiment in Afghanistan as NATO combat troops look to exit the country in 2014 and strengthen fragile security.

Such incidents have complicated U.S. efforts to negotiate a strategic partnership agreement to define its presence once most foreign combat troops pull out by the end of 2014.

Panetta said he regretted the Times' decision to publish some of the photos, which he said might trigger retaliatory violence against foreign soldiers stationed in Afghanistan.

Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said U.S. forces in Afghanistan were taking security measures to protect against a possible backlash over the photographs, adding that the images could be "used by the enemy to incite violence."

The Times said the photographs were of suicide bombers and insurgents. Reuters was unable to independently confirm whether they were insurgents or ordinary Afghans caught up in violence.

The U.S. Army said it launched an investigation into the 18 photographs taken by members of the 82nd Airborne Division as soon as The Times showed them to military authorities, who had appealed for the newspaper not to publish them.

The Times said it obtained the pictures from a member of the unit who demanded anonymity and was concerned the photographs were evidence of a breakdown in leadership and discipline that threatened the security of the troops.

"The actions of the individuals photographed do not represent the policies of International Security Assistance Force or the U.S. Army," the commander of international forces in Afghanistan, U.S. General John Allen, said in a statement.

The burning of copies of the Koran at a major NATO airbase triggered a week of riots that left 30 dead and led to the deaths of six Americans.

The March rampage by a U.S. Army sergeant in two southern Afghan villages, in which 17 civilians were killed, prompted Afghan President Hamid Karzai to demand foreign soldiers confine themselves to major bases.

SUICIDE ATTACKS

Taliban insurgents launched suicide attacks in Kabul and three other provinces during the weekend, claiming the assault was launched in retaliation for all of the incidents.

The Times said the photographs were taken at a difficult time for the 82nd Airborne in Afghanistan, and virtually all of the soldiers in the pictures had friends who were killed by homemade bombs or suicide bombers.

The soldiers initially were sent to collect evidence to help identify the body of a suicide bomber at a police station in Afghanistan's Zabol province in February 2010.

They revisited several months later to collect evidence to help identify three suspected insurgents killed when they accidentally detonated a bomb they were building. The soldiers took pictures with remains on both visits, The Times said.

Within that time frame, the commander and top noncommissioned officer of one battalion were relieved of duty and ordered home after slides with racial and sexist overtones were shown during daily briefings, the Times said.

And turmoil at the unit's home base in North Carolina prompted the commander to bar the wife of a senior commander in Afghanistan from interacting with her husband's brigade, saying her influence was "detrimental to the morale and well-being of the unit," The Fayetteville Observer reported.

The Times defended its publication of the photos.

"After careful consideration, we decided that publishing a small but representative selection of the photos would fulfill our obligation to readers to report vigorously and impartially on all aspects of the American mission in Afghanistan," Times Editor Davan Maharaj said in the newspaper's article.

But Navy Captain John Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman, noted that the photographs were two years old and bore no relevance to current security or leadership issues. "The only thing that made the story 'news' is the graphic nature of the imagery," he said. "Take that away, and you've got little of substance."

(Additional reporting by Jack Kimball in Kabul, Arshad Mohammed in Brussels and Laura MacInnis in Washington; writing by David Alexander; editing by Todd Eastham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (45)
MetalHead8 wrote:
No, have we learned nothing? Unbelievable.

Apr 18, 2012 9:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
OIFVetAtUSC wrote:
Indeed. Bad taste all the way around. Almost as bad as Mujahadeen fighters in the late 80s video taping the the brutal butchering of Soviet prisoners and then dragging their dead and dying victims near a burning convoy in the YouTube video. Granted, war is bad enough as non-participants envision it back home, but war can be a real bitch on the weaker minded among those of us who have seen and fought it. So, be smug and indignant — and show your piousness — and move on.

Apr 18, 2012 9:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Toxic_Kitty wrote:
So what? Leave these boys alone and let them vent. This kind of stuff has been going on since time began. Wars are bloody, vicious affairs that people sitting in their comfortable living rooms cannot begin to comprehend, and cannot be waged under the umbrella of political correctness. We send these boys over to do our dirty work and then get squeamish when they celebrate.

Apr 18, 2012 9:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.