UPDATE 1-White House renews veto threat over Keystone

Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:12pm EDT

* Republicans include pipeline in highway funding bill

* Obama previously put pipeline project on hold

By Roberta Rampton

WASHINGTON, April 17 (Reuters) - The White House on Tuesday renewed its threat to veto legislation to fund U.S. transportation projects responsible for millions of jobs if it includes the politically charged Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL oil pipeline.

Republicans in the House of Representatives have included the pipeline in a bill that proposes a 90-day extension of funding for highway, bridge, and transit construction. The House is expected to vote on the legislation on Wednesday.

In a statement on the proposal, presidential advisers said the legislation would circumvent "longstanding and proven process" for determining whether pipelines are in the national interest.

It said mandating the pipeline before a new route was "submitted and assessed" would prompt a recommendation that President Barack Obama veto the long-delayed transportation legislation, said to be crucial for the economy.

Obama earlier this year put a hold on TransCanada's $7 billion project, designed to bring crude oil from Canada and North Dakota to Texas refineries, because he said it needed further environmental review in Nebraska.

Obama does, however, support development of the southern leg of the pipeline that would run from the Cushing, Oklahoma, storage hub to Texas.

House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, has made Keystone a cornerstone of his election-year jobs agenda. But the measure was part of a larger transportation plan that crumbled in the House this year due to a lack of Republican support.

House Republicans, in their new, scaled-back transportation plan, backed away from controversial provisions in the ill-fated bill to expand oil and gas drilling and use related revenues for road and transit construction. They also dropped an unpopular plan to decouple transit spending from its dedicated funding source.

The House will consider a handful of amendments to the latest proposal on Wednesday. Current highway spending expires in June.

Obama's initial veto threat of the House transportation bill in February covered the energy and transit measures favored by Republican leaders.

Republicans continue to sharply criticize Obama's decision on Keystone XL and again are pushing for the full project, saying it would create jobs and bring more oil to the United States at a time of surging gasoline prices.

In a vote that included some Democratic support, Republicans in the Senate narrowly failed in March to attach the Keystone provision to a two-year, $109 billion transportation bill that was later approved by the chamber.

If the House clears the latest stop-gap funding plan, negotiators from that chamber would join with Senate colleagues to form a conference committee to try to craft a compromise transportation bill.

"I think the House will bring it (Keystone) back and the objective is to get to conference with it," said Senator John Hoeven from North Dakota, a Republican who led the effort in the Senate to approve the pipeline.

Hoeven said he is optimistic the Keystone measure would survive House-Senate conference negotiations because it nearly cleared the Senate.

House Democratic leader Steny Hoyer said Congress must complete a transportation spending bill soon.

"We need to get confidence and stability to the economy to the business community, we need to make sure that we get jobs the highway bill does produce," Hoyer said.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
policywhiz wrote:
I guess he wants a second chance to prove that he does not want to employee thousands of people who need work.

Apr 17, 2012 9:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
skifisss wrote:
Rather than drill for oil domestically or accept millions of barrels of oil from the Canadians to help ease high gas prices, Obama will fight against those options and instead appoint a committee to try to make gas prices go down. More bureaucracy yayy!

Apr 17, 2012 10:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cldmstrsn wrote:
Actually, the gas that would be coming from canada and north dakota, would actually head to the world market and not directly to the United States and would not help gas prices very much if at all. So in making sure that the pipeline does not do any damage to our already fragile protected areas its a good thing that we make a solid assesment before moving forward. Obama wants this to happen, but not before being responsible about it. Please do research on subjects before making uninformed comments. Here is a great link that has no political ties but an actual assesment of where the oil would go. Give it a chance its a good read. http://www.tarsandsaction.org/spread-the-word/key-facts-keystone-xl/

Apr 17, 2012 10:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.