Apple, Google, Intel fail to dismiss staff-poaching lawsuit

Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:17pm EDT

Customers enter the Apple flagship retail store to purchase the new iPad in San Francisco, California in this March 16, 2012 file photograph. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

Customers enter the Apple flagship retail store to purchase the new iPad in San Francisco, California in this March 16, 2012 file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Apple Inc, Google Inc, Intel Corp and four other technology companies were ordered by a judge to face an antitrust lawsuit claiming they illegally conspired not to poach each other's employees.

District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, rejected the companies' bid to dismiss claims brought under the federal Sherman antitrust law and California's own antitrust law, the Cartwright Act.

In a decision on Wednesday night, Koh said the existence of "Do Not Cold Call" agreements among various defendants "supports the plausible inference that the agreements were negotiated, reached, and policed at the highest levels" of the companies.

"The fact that all six identical bilateral agreements were reached in secrecy among seven defendants in a span of two years suggests that these agreements resulted from collusion, and not from coincidence," Koh added.

Other defendants in the case included Adobe Systems Inc, Intuit Inc, Walt Disney Co's Pixar unit and Lucasfilm Ltd. Koh dismissed a claim brought under California's unfair competition law.

Lawyers for the defendants were not immediately available for comment.

The proposed class-action lawsuit was brought by five software engineers who accused the companies of conspiring to limit pay and job mobility by eliminating competition for labor, costing workers hundreds of millions of dollars.

Their claims are similar to those raised in 2010 by the Department of Justice when it settled antitrust probes against the companies.

Without admitting wrongdoing, the companies agreed not to take steps to restrict competition for workers, including setting limits on cold-calling and recruiting.

Among the revelations stemming from the litigation was a 2007 email trail involving the late Steve Jobs and Eric Schmidt, then respectively Apple's and Google's chief executives, over Google's apparent effort to recruit an Apple engineer.

"I would be very pleased if your recruiting department would stop doing this," Jobs wrote Schmidt, an Apple director at the time.

Schmidt forwarded that email to various people, asking if they could "get this stopped."

Eventually, Google's staffing director said the employee who recruited the engineer would be fired, and added: "Please extend my apologies as appropriate to Steve Jobs."

Joseph Saveri, a lawyer for the five plaintiff engineers, said their case remains on track for a June 2013 trial.

"This is a significant step forward," Saveri said in an email.

All of the defendants are based in California: Adobe in San Jose; Apple in Cupertino; Google and Intuit in Mountain View; Intel in Santa Clara; Lucasfilm in San Francisco; and Pixar in Emeryville. Walt Disney is based in Burbank.

The case is In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, District Court, Northern District of California, No. 11-02509.

(Reporting By Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Richard Chang)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
tmc wrote:
Hurray for the Judge!! This happens so often in the technology world.

Apr 19, 2012 12:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:
Now that the scorcerer is dead I expect apple to decline. It’s interesting to me that something that was called a tech company can be so much more a human manipulation company rather than what you might expect from technical/scientific people. I guess it’s all in the packaging, and not so different from the standard business manipulations that most businesses do these days. I wonder if the cultists are feeling lonely these days? HP has a cult like culture too, perhaps you all can follow them instead (yes I know they don’t have good products, but neither did apple – you only think they are good because they disconnect you from reality, they are drug-like, you escape through the i-portal).

Apr 19, 2012 1:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Good news for the Silicon Valley workers
who are never paid for their overtime hours,

Some have called them modern slaves or high tech sweat shops,
for that reason.

Apr 19, 2012 3:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.