Under pressure, Disney film boss Ross resigns

LOS ANGELES Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:51pm EDT

Walt Disney Studios Chairman Rich Ross (L) and Walt Disney Company President and Chief Executive Officer Bob Iger pose together at the world premiere of Disney Pixar's ''Toy Story 3'' at the El Capitan Theatre in Hollywood, California in this June 13, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok/Files

Walt Disney Studios Chairman Rich Ross (L) and Walt Disney Company President and Chief Executive Officer Bob Iger pose together at the world premiere of Disney Pixar's ''Toy Story 3'' at the El Capitan Theatre in Hollywood, California in this June 13, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Danny Moloshok/Files

Related Topics

Photo

How do I look?

Famous faces caught sneaking a peek in the mirror or applying a little makeup.  Slideshow 

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Rich Ross resigned under pressure as chairman of Walt Disney Co's movie studio after a less than three-year run that included the release of "John Carter," one of the biggest flops in recent Hollywood history.

Ross, named to the job in October 2009, was never able to duplicate the success he enjoyed as president of the Disney Channel, where he was credited with creating monster franchises that included "High School Musical" and "Hannah Montana."

"I no longer believe that the Chairman role is the right professional fit for me," Ross told his staff in an email.

Disney will not immediately name a new head for its studio, a source familiar with the matter said.

In a statement, Disney CEO Bob Iger said: "For more than a decade, Rich Ross' creative instincts, business acumen and personal integrity have driven results in key businesses for Disney. ... I appreciate his countless contributions throughout his entire career at Disney and expect he will have tremendous success in whatever he chooses to do next."

Ross kept a low profile at the Disney Channel and never adapted to Hollywood glad handing, according to a source with knowledge of his style. At the April 11 premiere for Disney's big budget film "The Avengers," the studio chief stood off to the side while the movie's stars chatted up other executives.

Ross lost the confidence of Disney's big name producers, including Jerry Bruckheimer, who produced its "Pirates of the Caribbean" movies, said one person with knowledge of the relationship. Last summer, Ross shut down production of Bruckheimer's big budget film "The Lone Ranger" over budget issues and cut its $250 million budget to $215 million

The studio executive took the heat for letting the "John Carter" budget rise to $250 million from $200 million, said one person with knowledge of Disney thinking, and for its lackluster marketing effort. Ross killed another big budget film, a remake of "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea," but let "John Carter" production begin.

Disney said in March it expected the film to lose about $200 million and to saddle its studio with $80 million to $120 million in operating losses.

The swiftness of Ross' resignation leaves Disney without an obvious successor for the job.

Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige and Ross' lieutenant, Walt Disney Studios president Alan Bergman, are long shots to replace Ross. Disney will likely look for a candidate outside its house.

Ross "was a superstar at the Disney Channel, and the results at the studio have not been exceptional," said Evercore Partners analyst Alan Gould. Still, he said Ross' exit was a surprise given his earlier success in Disney's cable business.

Ross joined Disney Channel in 1996 as a programming and production executive and was promoted to president of the cable channel in 2004. His success at the Disney Channel made him a rising star in the company and eventually led to his being hand-picked by Iger to replace long-time chairman Dick Cook, whom Iger forced out, as head of its film division.

Ross had few big hits during his tenure. "Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides" was a global smash, but part of an established franchise. He also made waves when he picked a Hollywood outsider, M.T. Carney, to run film marketing for Disney. She left the studio earlier this year just as "John Carter" was completed.

Ironically, Ross could have his biggest hit when "The Avengers" is released in the United States on May 4.

The film, featuring action stars from Disney's Marvel subsidiary, is expected to be one of the year's biggest hits. Opening weekend sales may reach $155 million in the United States and Canada, according to Boxoffice.com.

For investors, the departure of Ross should have little impact, analyst Gould said. Disney's results are driven by its much-larger theme-park and cable network businesses.

Disney shares gained 27 cents, or 0.6 percent, to close at $42.35 on the New York Stock Exchange.

(Reporting By Ronald Grover and Lisa Richwine; editing by Peter Lauria, Andre Grenon, Dave Zimmerman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
Lord_Foxdrake wrote:
Oh … noes … it’s the end of the world.

PANIC!

Sell your Disney stock! It’s all over folks, the apocalypse is here!

Apr 20, 2012 12:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
realBillBrown wrote:
It’s inarguable that Disney’s studio has produced some tremendously inept films over the last few years, such as the aforementioned “John Carter”, plus (no conversation could be complete without its mention) “Mars Needs Moms”, the first few moments terrified my 6 and 4 year-olds (thanks for that, Disney!). And I wonder if the timing of this resignation suggests that “Avengers” may be tracking poorly in test screenings … obviously, it’s a Friday afternoon in mid-Spring, and the nice weather allows for announcements like this to “slip by” somewhat, but still … why would Mr. Ross leave BEFORE “Avengers” premiere if it was shaping up to be the true “tentpole” of the summer??

I tend to think that Avengers will open “big” (but not record-setting), and then sort of flame out in 2-3 weeks, gone entirely by late June from screens. Too big, too expensive, and too jumbled a story (“mashup”?!?) to resonate with any audience except hardcore comic book fans. We’ll see.

Now, how much of all this is the fault of Mr. Ross, who’s only in the job for 2 years? Disney should have canned the producer/director of “John Carter” versus (or in addition to) any firing of Ross.

My 2 cents.

Disney should focus more on story development, versus starting out wanting to build a studio and theme park franchise, for whatever that advice is worth.

Apr 20, 2012 12:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PhilGust wrote:
Let’s be clear. “John Carter” was successful as a movie, despite being one of the biggest failures of marketing at any Hollywood studio. The movie had all the ingredients to be a hit, including action, adventure, romance, and a fiercely devoted fan following for the stories and the movie.

What went wrong? According to industry insiders, the Disney movie studio’s marketing organization fell apart in a power struggle, the release date was hurriedly pushed forward by months to steer clear of “The Avengers,” and the film was given only the the “economy package” by the remnants of a marketing staff who didn’t understand the genre or the story. They also failed to capitalize on its merchandising opportunities, a foundation of the studio’s early success.

Despite that, “John Carter” is doing block-buster business in all markets outside the US, and has more than made back it’s investment, despite the studio’s claims, even before its release on DVD.

Walt Disney would be ashamed of the way the studio he created failed to perform. As a shareholder and a life-long Disney fan, I’m disappointed too. We’ll never know what role Mr. Ross played or failed to play, but as studio head he bears the ultimate responsibility for letting both fans and shareholders down, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Apr 20, 2012 4:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.