AMR unions want to take a chance on US Air merger

Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:34pm EDT

1 of 8. A US Airways jet taxies to the runway as an American Airlines jet waits on the tarmac in Charlotte, North Carolina April 20, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Keane

Related Video

(Reuters) - Labor groups at bankrupt American Airlines said on Friday they support a potential merger with rival US Airways Group Inc in a deal they say would save more jobs than a plan by parent AMR Corp to reorganize as a stand-alone carrier.

The unions representing American's pilots, flight attendants and ground workers said they struck a deal with US Airways that would preserve 6,200 of the 14,200 jobs American says it would cut if it pursues its current plan.

Their joint statement supporting a merger is an unusual and dramatic twist that comes ahead of a showdown next week with AMR over the company's request in bankruptcy court for permission to void labor contracts and impose new terms.

Airline consultant Robert Mann, a former AMR executive, said he cannot think of another occasion when airline unions actively supported a merger, because those deals usually mean job cuts.

"For the American unions, it's a real indictment to the company's plan. In fact, they are casting their lot with the devil they don't know rather than the devil they do," Mann said.

He added that none of the posturing by unions ahead of next week's hearing necessarily moves AMR any closer to a merger.

"We're not yet even to the point where an alternate plan has been presented to the court," he said.

US Airways Chief Executive Doug Parker cautioned his employees in a letter on Friday that the union deal does not mean a merger is in the works. He noted that a deal would need support from the AMR creditors, management team and its board of directors.

"But this is obviously an important first step along that path and we are hopeful we can all work together to make this happen," Parker said.

AMR spokesman Bruce Hicks dismissed union support for merger talks, noting the company's right in bankruptcy court to create its own reorganization plan without interference at least until September 28.

"These statements do not in any way alter the company's commitment to pursue our business," the airline said in a statement.

Parker, who worked at AMR in the 1980s with Tom Horton, now AMR's CEO, has been a vocal proponent of airline consolidation as a means to cut excess capacity on unprofitable routes. He said a deal with AMR would create a "preeminent airline with the enhanced scale and breadth required to compete more effectively and profitably."

Although AMR has tried for months to blunt speculation, US Airways has hired advisers to explore merger options with AMR, but has not issued a proposal.

In a statement on Thursday, Horton said recent merger talk is "fueled by those who seek to serve their own agendas, including the circulation of misleading information."

NEW AMERICAN AIRLINES

David Bates, president of the Allied Pilots Association, which represents the pilots, said in a letter to members that a combined carrier would be branded American Airlines and be based in Fort Worth, Texas, which is where AMR is currently based. US Airways has its headquarters in Tempe, Arizona.

The new carrier would remain in the one world global airline alliance and would be comparable in scope and size with rivals United Airlines and Delta Air Lines Inc, which overtook AMR in size after their own mergers, Bates said.

He said American's orders for narrow-body aircraft would proceed and the former US Airways system would be aligned with American Airlines routes to add more cities.

AMR's three labor unions are members of the company's unsecured creditors committee, which has nine members and gets a say in how AMR restructures.

"We are pleased to confirm our support of a possible merger between our airline and US Airways," the unions said on Friday in a statement provided to Reuters.

Typically, a company cannot exit bankruptcy without the support of its unsecured creditors committee. AMR also needs the support of the large investors that hold their secured debt, although their claims are guaranteed and are the first to be repaid.

AMR management has said it may consider a merger with another airline only after it emerges from bankruptcy as an independent company.

People familiar with the airline's thinking have said that management wants to negotiate a merger on its own terms and could set its sights on different targets, ranging from JetBlue Airways Corp to Alaska Air Group Inc to US Airways.

But AMR's creditors believe the management's plan to remain independent is not viable and that it should actively explore a merger with US Airways or another airline to compete in the consolidating industry, several people close to the creditors said.

In addition to AMR's labor unions, the rest of the unsecured creditors committee also thinks AMR management should engage with US Airways to evaluate whether such a combination will generate a better recovery of their claims as well as synergies on the operation front, the same sources said.

In March, US Airways gave a presentation to representatives of AMR's unsecured creditors and told them that a proposed merger of the two airlines would create about $1.5 billion in synergies, the sources said.

Aside from the unions, the committee includes the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp (PBGC), the government agency that protects under funded pension plans; Boeing Co, Hewlett-Packard Co; and the banks acting for AMR bondholders - Wilmington Trust Co, Bank of New York Mellon Corp and Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

Delta is also studying a potential bid for AMR, but the carrier has not presented a merger plan to AMR's unions or creditors in a way that US Airways has made an outreach to the stakeholders of AMR, people familiar with the matter have said.

SHOWDOWN WITH UNIONS

AMR filed for Chapter 11 last November, citing labor costs that were uncompetitive with profitable rivals such as United Airlines and Delta Air Lines that restructured in bankruptcy and later took on merger partners.

AMR has pursued deals with unions on concessions, drawing outrage by workers, who point to sacrifices they made to keep the company afloat in 2003.

The airline still wants negotiated deals, but frustrated with the pace of talks, has asked the U.S. bankruptcy court in Manhattan for permission to void labor contracts. A hearing on the matter is set to begin next week.

American wants to cut 13,000 union jobs, or roughly 15 percent of its work force, as part of a plan to save $1.25 billion in annual labor costs.

The airline said on Wednesday it intends to cut another 1,200 nonunion jobs to reach its goal of trimming 15 percent of the work force.

Separately on Friday, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Sean Lane dismissed a suit by the Allied Pilots Association that had sought a ruling holding that American cannot void its labor contract because it has technically expired.

Judge Lane, in ruling on that matter, said the union's collective bargaining agreement has not expired but rather had become amendable under U.S. labor law, meaning the contract could be subject to dismissal as part of the bankruptcy process.

AMR shares closed 4.7 percent down at 55 cents. US Airways shares were down 1.8 percent at $9.34.

(The lawsuit was Allied Pilots Association vs. AMR Corp et al, US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, No 12-1094.)

(Reporting By Kyle Peterson in Chicago, Karen Jacobs in Atlanta and Soyoung Kim in New York; editing by Dave Zimmerman, Steve Orlofsky, Matthew Lewis, Andre Grenon and Richard Chang)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
sjtom wrote:
Idiots. Mergers always result in lay-offs. Always.

Apr 20, 2012 12:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Twang wrote:
Unions…Where business goes to die.

Apr 20, 2012 12:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ErnieScarr wrote:
Its easier for a union to hold one company hostage, rather then two.

Apr 20, 2012 1:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures