UPDATE 3-China's military warns of confrontation over seas

Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:19pm EDT

Related Topics

(Adds Pentagon comment, paragraphs 7-8)

By Chris Buckley

BEIJING, April 21 (Reuters) - China's military warned the United States on Saturday that U.S.-Philippine military exercises have raised risks of armed confrontation over the disputed South China Sea, in the toughest high-level warning yet after weeks of tension.

China's official Liberation Army Daily warned that recent jostling with the Philippines over disputed seas where both countries have sent ships could boil over into outright conflict, and laid much of the blame at Washington's door.

American and Filipino troops launched two weeks of annual naval drills on April 16 amid the stand-off between Beijing and Manila, who have accused each other of encroaching on sovereign seas near the Scarborough Shoal, west of a former U.S. navy base at Subic Bay.

The joint exercises are held in different seas around the Philippines. The leg that takes place in the South China Sea area, which could be rich in oil and gas and is spanned by busy shipping lanes, starts on Monday.

"Anyone with clear eyes saw long ago that behind these drills is reflected a mentality that will lead the South China Sea issue down a fork in the road towards military confrontation and resolution through armed force," said the commentary in the Chinese paper, which is the chief mouthpiece of the People's Liberation Army.

"Through this kind of meddling and intervention, the United States will only stir up the entire South China Sea situation towards increasing chaos, and this will inevitably have a massive impact on regional peace and stability."

The Pentagon said this was a regular exercise "not tied to any current situation."

"The focus of this year's exercise is on disaster response and civic assistance," said Pentagon spokeswoman, Navy Commander Leslie Hull-Ryde.

Up to now, China has chided the Philippines over the dispute about the uninhabited shoal known in the Philippines as the Panatag Shoal and which China calls Huangyan, about 124 nautical miles off the main Philippine island of Luzon.

China has territorial disputes with the Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Taiwan across the South China Sea.

Major General Luo Yuan, a retired PLA researcher well-known for his hawkish views, amplified the warnings from Beijing issued through state media.

"China has already shown enough restraint and patience over this incident," Luo said of the friction with Manila, according to an interview published on Chinese state television's website (news.cntv.cn).

If the Philippines "takes irrational actions, then the current confrontation could intensify, and the Chinese navy will certainly not stand idly by," he added.

REGIONAL TENSIONS

Beijing has sought to resolve the disputes one-on-one with the countries involved but there is worry among its neighbours over what some see as growing Chinese assertiveness in staking claims over the seas and various islands, reefs and shoals.

In past patches of tension over disputed seas, hawkish Chinese military voices have also risen, only to be reined in later by the government. The same could be true this time.

Since late 2010, China has sought to cool tensions with the United States. Especially with the ruling Chinese Communist Party preoccupied with a leadership succession late in 2012, Beijing has stressed hopes for steady relations throughout this year.

Nonetheless, experts have said China remains wary of U.S. military intentions across the Asia-Pacific, especially after the Obama administration's vows to "pivot" to the region, reinvigorating diplomatic and security ties with allies.

The Liberation Army Daily commentary echoed that wariness.

"The United States' intention of trying to draw more countries into stirring up the situation in the South China Sea is being brandished to the full," said the newspaper. (Additional reporting by Phil Stewart in Washington; editing by Sanjeev Miglani and Mohammad Zargham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
DragonTattooz wrote:
Beyond funny. China may have some clout when it comes to manufacturing cheap, plastic garbage for sell-out US corporations…but their military is nothing less than a joke. Hey, China! Why don’t you bring one of your aircraft carriers to the region? Oh, that’s right, you don’t have one…LOL (No, the refitted Russian piece of junk currently in sea trials does not count)

http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.asp

***Disclaimer*** This is strictly my unbiased, objective opinion based on the facts as I understand them. Facts are facts and when you spend more money than all other countries on the planet combined on defense, you get the baddest military on the planet. It’s not drum beating or chest pounding, it is just the way it is. Personally, I wish my country did not feel a need to police the world and spend our hard-earned tax dollars on useless toys for a bunch of psychopaths (political leaders, generals and defense contractors in particular) who just want to blow stuff up and kill people. But, what I want does not matter to the people in charge…

but

..that does not change the fact that in a shooting war, our military would annihilate China’s.

Apr 22, 2012 4:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
HyperTruth wrote:
the longest retreat in US history was because of China back in the Korean War. China pushed back the US and the UN single handedly.

since modernizing its military China has been begging for someone to give them an excuse.

America is that excuse.

Apr 22, 2012 6:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.