Congress presses investigation of Secret Service scandal

WASHINGTON Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:39pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two senior House of Representatives Republicans expressed confidence in the head of the U.S. Secret Service on Sunday despite the agency's Colombia prostitution scandal while a Senate committee chairman planned hearings into the matter.

Senator Joseph Lieberman, an independent, said that the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that he chairs will send specific questions to the Secret Service this week about the scandal before the panel holds public hearings. Other congressional committees also are investigating.

The Secret Service, which protects the president, vice president and other prominent U.S. political figures, said on Friday that three more of its employees resigned. That brought to six the number who have departed in connection with alleged misconduct involving prostitutes in Colombia this month before President Barack Obama's trip to the seaside city of Cartagena.

The Secret Service also said a 12th employee had been implicated in the investigation into an incident that also involved 11 U.S. military personnel.

Representative Peter King, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, told the NBC program "Meet the Press" that he expects several more Secret Service agents to leave the agency "within the very near future."

At least 21 women were brought back to a beach front hotel and the behavior of the Secret Service men was exposed when one of the Colombian women complained that she had not been paid enough, resulting in local police getting involved.

Lieberman also said the White House should launch its own internal review of all White House personnel and advance teams who were in Cartagena "to make sure that no one working for the White House was involved in any of the same kind of inappropriate behavior that the Secret Service agents were."

Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan was given an endorsement on Sunday by King and a second Republican House committee chairman.

"Director Sullivan, from the moment this broke, has moved effectively and this investigation is going full speed ahead," King said. "I believe Director Sullivan has done a fine job."

King added that procedures must be put in place "to ensure it never happens again."

Representative Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, told "Meet the Press" that he has "great confidence" in Sullivan's handling of the investigation into the matter.

Asked whether he has confidence in Sullivan, Lieberman said, "I do at this point. ... I think he's conducting a comprehensive investigation."

'MORE SERIOUS THAN JUST A FROLIC'

Lieberman said his committee's investigation will seek to determine whether the actions in Colombia were part of a pattern of behavior that happened over time elsewhere and what steps will be implemented to prevent any such actions in the future.

"It's more serious than just a frolic. History is full of cases where enemies have compromised people and security or intelligence of positions with sex," Lieberman said on the program "Fox News Sunday."

He told the CBS program "Face the Nation": "For Secret Service agents who have the responsibility to protect the president, to act as these people did in Cartagena, as if they were college kids on a spring break, is reprehensible."

King's office released a letter he sent to Sullivan, dated Friday, asking for answers to 50 questions about the matter, including whether any White House officials were involved in the incident in Cartagena.

David Axelrod, senior advisor to Obama's re-election campaign, said the president has confidence in Sullivan and the Secret Service. "But this is really disturbing. We have to get to the bottom of it and I'm sure that we will," he told NBC's "Meet the Press."

(Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Jason Lange and Doina Chiacu; Editing by Bill Trott)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Robert76 wrote:
While it is a shame that a few people have soiled the name of the group that defends Presidents, Vice-Presidents, Candidates, visiting Foreign leaders, etc, I do not believe Congress needs to get involved. I believe the Secret Service themselves can do the house cleaning on this one.

Disbelief is all I can feel about this incident. Aside from the imorality displayed, these people were part of the advance security detail and could easily have jepordized the safety of the President and other dignitaries in attendance. This goes against everything these people stand for.

Apr 22, 2012 4:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BPascal wrote:
My question is still, who’s going to pay the sex worker the US$575 [800-225]left the bodyguards didn’t pay, as agreed?

Apr 22, 2012 4:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.