Proview owns iPad trademark in China -govt official

SHANGHAI, April 24 Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:57am EDT

SHANGHAI, April 24 (Reuters) - Proview Technology (Shenzhen), which is battling Apple Inc in a Chinese court over the iPad trademark, is the rightful owner of that mark, a senior official with the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) said on Tuesday.

"According to the ... provisions of the China Trademark Law, currently Shenzhen Proview is the legal registrant of the iPad trademark," Fu Shuangjian, a deputy director of SAIC, was quoted as saying at a news conference in Beijing.

Fu's remarks were the first public comments from a government official on the matter, and may signal how the court could rule.

"This case has a huge impact and the final court ruling would directly influence who owns the iPad trademark. The commerce department will (take the matter) very seriously," said Fu, whose department governs market regulation and supervision.

The transcript of his comments was posted on an official news website: ()

Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.

The long-running saga over who owns the iPad trademark in China, pits the world's most valuable technology company against the Shenzhen unit of Hong Kong-listed Proview International Holdings Ltd.

The tussle culminated in a February hearing at the Higher People's Court in Guangzhou. The court has not issued a ruling.

Proview's lawyer told Reuters on Monday that the firm is still negotiating with Apple's lawyers but talks have not led to a decision. Proview has said it favours an out-of-court settlement, which usually involves the payment of compensation, which analysts have said the company needs to repay its creditors.

Apple's trademark woes in China are one of the problems plaguing the technology giant in the country. Apple recently agreed to work with its key supplier, Foxconn Technology Group, to ensure better working conditions for Foxconn's workers.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
DAM12 wrote:
Here’s a novel idea for one of the largest companies in the world. Move your manufacturing out of China to the U.S. and create jobs here that are needed. We are one of the biggest customer bases for Apple products. The other company is looking for a big payout for a name. They probably never even manufactured a product but just the name. Like so many domain name brokers and patents that have no tangible product for the owners.

Apr 24, 2012 3:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
DAM12 wrote:
Here’s a novel idea for one of the largest companies in the world. Move your manufacturing out of China to the U.S. and create jobs here that are needed. We are one of the biggest customer bases for Apple products. The other company is looking for a big payout for a name. They probably never even manufactured a product but just the name. Like so many domain name brokers and patents that have no tangible product for the owners.

Apr 24, 2012 3:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.