Dutch "burqa ban" may go after government falls

AMSTERDAM Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:17pm EDT

1 of 2. Protestors demonstrate against the ban on Muslim women wearing the burqa in public in The Hague, November 30, 2006.

Credit: Reuters/Toussaint Kluiters

Related Topics

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - With the collapse of the Dutch centre-right government, the Netherlands may now drop some of its most eye-popping proposals aimed at Muslims and other immigrants and could soften its strong anti-immigration rhetoric.

A ban on Muslim face veils, such as the Arabic-style niqabs that leave the eyes uncovered and Afghan-style burqas that cover the face with a cloth grid, is less likely to go ahead after the government collapsed at the weekend.

The minority Liberal-Christian Democrat coalition's alliance with Geert Wilders' Freedom Party (PVV) fell apart when they could not reach agreement on crucial budget cuts. An election has been called for September 12.

In return for Wilders' support in parliament, the government had proposed a number of laws, including bans on Muslim face veils and on dual nationality.

If it appears clear that there is no longer a parliamentary majority in favor of such proposals, they could soon be taken "off the table", said Maurits Berger, professor of Islam in the contemporary West at Leiden University.

"These policies were driven by PVV but also by this government in order to maintain their relationship with PVV. They have turned Holland into a pariah," Berger said.

"These are the legacy of the PVV. Face veils, dual nationality - both these proposals have not really been thought through."

The Christian Democrats will no longer support a proposal to ban dual nationality, a source within the party told Reuters. The party also feels uneasy about the face veil ban, Dutch daily De Volkskrant said.

Many opposition parties, including Labor, Democrats 66 and GreenLeft, had already opposed the proposed face veil and dual nationality bans, leaving the proposals without majority support in parliament if the Christian Democrats don't back them.

Now that the government has fallen, Dutch Immigration Minister Gerd Leers will no longer push for issues such as the need to make it harder for immigrants to bring in other family members, his spokesman said.

Over the past decade there has been a pronounced shift in the Netherlands towards tougher immigration policies, pushed by politicians like Pim Fortuyn and, more recently, by Wilders.

Wilders' tough stance on immigrants, particularly Muslims and more recently those from European Union member countries including Poland, have backfired on the Netherlands.

Leers tried to mend ties with Poland last month after Wilders, who requires 24-hour protection because he has received death threats, launched a website targeting workers from eastern and central Europe.

His website drew criticism from the European Commission and Parliament as well as from countries including Poland, Bulgaria and Romania but Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte declined to speak out publicly against it.

(Additional reporting by Sara Webb; Editing by Alessandra Rizzo)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
McBob08 wrote:
The face veil ban is a good thing. Our faces are our identities more and more in this modern age, and when you see someone covering their face, that puts you at a disadvantage, and that person at an advantage. It’s an unnecessary social risk. Add to that the fact that the face veil is a symbol of the oppression of women and you’ve got plenty of compelling reasons for banning the veil.

If women want to wear it in their own mosques and homes, then more power to them, but in public, we’ve got to see their faces!

Apr 26, 2012 7:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
xeh wrote:
There are reasons why you don’t want people walking around covering their faces and bodys(crime / health effects like hypovitaminosis D/ use as a way to oppress and control women).

Even if it were a religious thing(which is isn’t – it’s cultural). Then I’d still be in favour of banning it in public places. I don’t see what your specific subscribed deity has to do with tolerating the reasons mentioned above.

To me the burqua is distasteful and should be banned from all public places (66 percent of the uk population seem to agree with me).

Apr 27, 2012 4:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
I think the Netherlands should keep it’s ban on the Burqa. I do not want to see Islam drag “the West” into participating in it’s practice of such antiquated and discriminatory traditions, as covering a woman’s face. I don’t think that the Hijab, when covering only the hair, ears and neck, is a problem. However, requiring a woman to cover her face, except for her eyes, to me is barbaric. By the way, it is not dictated by the Koran. I think it is a cultural “ban”, instigated by Muslim men, who want to keep women subservient.

Apr 27, 2012 10:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.