Connecticut abolishes death penalty

HARTFORD, Connecticut Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:23pm EDT

Protesters against the execution of serial killer Michael Ross hold candles during a vigil outside the gates to the Osborn Correctional Institution in Enfield, Connecticut, May 13, 2005. Connecticut has executed only one person, Michael Ross in 2005, since the death penalty was reinstated in the United States in 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

Protesters against the execution of serial killer Michael Ross hold candles during a vigil outside the gates to the Osborn Correctional Institution in Enfield, Connecticut, May 13, 2005. Connecticut has executed only one person, Michael Ross in 2005, since the death penalty was reinstated in the United States in 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Related Topics

HARTFORD, Connecticut (Reuters) - The governor of Connecticut on Wednesday signed into law a repeal of the death penalty, making it the fifth state in recent years to abandon capital punishment.

Democratic Gov. Dannel Malloy signed the legislation without fanfare behind closed doors, saying in a statement it was "a moment for sober reflection, not celebration."

With the law, which replaces the death penalty with life in prison without the possibility of parole, Connecticut joins 16 other states and the District of Columbia that do not allow capital punishment.

Illinois, New Mexico and New Jersey all voted to abolish the death penalty in recent years, and New York's death penalty law was declared unconstitutional in 2004.

The repeal in Connecticut applies only to future sentences, and the 11 men on its death row now still face execution. However some legal experts have said defense attorneys could use the repeal measure to win life sentences for those inmates.

They include two men convicted of a grisly home invasion attack in 2007 that killed a mother and her two daughters. The only survivor, Dr. William Petit, who lost his wife and two children, had spoken out against the repeal.

About 30 family members of murder victims, clergy and anti-death penalty activists were in the governor's office for the signing.

"Some people were in tears when it was signed, and they were very thankful to the governor," said Ben Jones, executive director of the Connecticut Network to Abolish the Death Penalty, who attended the event.

Opponents of capital punishment said the move in Connecticut fuels momentum for broader abolition.

"We have another state saying, 'We've tried this experiment and the death penalty has failed,'" Shari Silberstein, executive director of Equal Justice USA, said in a statement.

Other state legislatures are considering bills to abolish the death penalty, and Oregon's governor has said he would halt all executions on his watch. A repeal measure has qualified for the ballot in California, home to nearly a quarter of the nation's death row inmates.

Connecticut's Democratic-controlled Senate and House of Representatives approved the repeal earlier this month.

Connecticut has executed only one person, in 2005, since the death penalty was reinstated in the United States in 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. The executed convict, Michael Ross, had abandoned his appeals.

Calling capital punishment "one of the most compelling and vexing issues of our time," the governor said he came to oppose capital punishment while working as a prosecutor.

"I learned firsthand that our system of justice is very imperfect," he said. "I came to believe that doing away with the death penalty was the only way to ensure it would not be unfairly imposed."

He also cited what he called its "unworkability."

"The people of this state pay for appeal after appeal, and then watch time and again as defendants are marched in front of the cameras, giving them a platform of public attention they don't deserve," he said. "The 11 men currently on death row in Connecticut are far more likely to die of old age than they are to be put to death."

(Additional reporting by Mary Ellen Godin, Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Doina Chiacu)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
jhasara wrote:
Great we abolishes the death penalty how about lowlying taxes

Apr 25, 2012 5:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Moby wrote:
In the absence of absolutes with respect to establishment of guilt for major crimes, I believe this is the right thing to do. It is not acceptable to cause someone’s death in face of the possibility of innocence. Many have been absolved of criminal actions after many years of incarceration. How many have unfairly lost their lives? Even a single one would be too many.

Just imagine how you would feel if a loved one were put to death unfairly.

Apr 25, 2012 5:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
roneida wrote:
They politicians are trolling for sob sister votes. Death is the only appropriate punishment for certain crimes, as the people of Conecticut well were shown not too long ago.

Unfortunately, it has been proven that our judiciary can not guarantee a fair and well researched trial between the over ambitious and the lazy lawyers involved.

God , and the NRA , are our ultimate defenders.

Apr 25, 2012 5:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.