Military to review course teaching "U.S. at war with Islam"

WASHINGTON Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:39pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top military officer ordered a review of training material after a course for officers was found to espouse the view that the United States is at war with Islam, the Pentagon said on Wednesday.

General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, sent a letter on Tuesday to leaders of the Army and other services, along with regional commanders and officials heading the National Guard, ordering a review of relevant training and education material across the military.

"This review will ensure our professional education programs exhibit the cultural sensitivity, respect for religion and intellectual balance that we should expect in our academic institutions," Dempsey said in the letter, an excerpt from which were read to Reuters.

The review, which was first reported by Wired.com, was prompted by a complaint by a soldier who had recently completed an elective course entitled "Perspectives on Islam and Islamite Radicalism" at the Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Virginia.

One example of objectionable material, presented in a power point slide for students, was an assertion "that the United States is at war with Islam and we ought to ought to just recognize that we are war with Islam," Captain John Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman, told reporters.

"That's not at all what we believe to be the case. We're at war against terrorism, specifically al Qaeda, who has a warped view of the Islamic faith."

Kirby said Defense Secretary Leon Panetta also felt "deep concern" over the discovery, which follows a string of incidents that, more than 10 years after the Afghan war began, have exposed a persisting gap between people in the conservative Muslim nation and the Western soldiers fighting Islamist militants there.

The incidents, embarrassing for the government of President Barack Obama as he seeks to mend U.S. ties with the Muslim world and shore up his campaign in Afghanistan, include bloody riots caused by U.S. soldiers' burning of copies of the Koran and photos showing U.S. soldiers posing with corpses of Afghans.

Dempsey also ordered an inquiry into how the material, which Kirby described as "objectionable" and "inflammatory," got into the course at Norfolk.

While hundreds of officers would have taken the course since it began in 2004, it's unclear how long the material identified as objectionable had been part of the curriculum. The 30-day inquiry should establish that.

The eight-week course, which was aimed at officers, has been suspended as the inquiry moves ahead.

The instructor has not been suspended from teaching duties, Kirby said. The soldier who made the complaint was not been identified.

(Editing by Doina Chiacu)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
KrisCraig wrote:
Last sentence appears to be a typo: “The soldier who made the complaint was not been identified.”

Should either be, “has not been identified,” or, “was not identified.”

Apr 25, 2012 2:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fatdaddio wrote:
What is wrong with our military leaders! We are at war with islam !!!!!!! There is a difference between tolerance and takeover. Our Founding Fathers would be ashamed of our country now. I love my country and am tired of all the others trying to ruin it. Bunch of dimwits.

Apr 25, 2012 2:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
A power point slide…that is not exactly an errant comment that did not make it out of print in time for publishing. We all know the goal is to motivate soldiers to hate, how else can the killing fields be maintained? It’s Us or Them… until they return from war injured, or mentally incapacitated, then they have the option of join the rank of Permanentaly Disabled. Or, if they fear long term commitments, perhaps they can protest and and hope to join the classification of the Temporarily Detained.

Apr 25, 2012 2:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.