Track China's Leaders

Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Tornado chasers

Storm chasers brave danger and debris as they try to capture photos of tornadoes' destructive power.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S. lawmaker urges investment treaty pact with China

WASHINGTON | Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:14pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A top U.S. Republican lawmaker on Thursday called on the Obama administration to negotiate an investment treaty with China and to increase pressure on the world's second-largest economy to make trade and currency reforms.

"Plain and simple, we cannot allow China to continue its unacceptable trade practices," House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp said in a speech, referring to longstanding barriers to U.S. exports and the widespread piracy and counterfeiting of U.S. goods.

"The litany of China's trade-distorting policies is deeply troubling and cannot be allowed to stand," Camp said. "In addition, we should pursue a Bilateral Investment Treaty with China," he said.

Camp's call for the United States to begin talks with China on a Bilateral Investment Treaty, or BIT, comes one week before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner travel to Beijing for high-level talks.

It also follows the Obama administration's announcement last Friday that it had finished three years of internal deliberations on a so-called "model BIT," which will be used as a template for future negotiations.

That has raised expectations China and the United States could announce at the May 3-4 Strategic and Economic Dialogue meeting that they are relaunching negotiations on an investment treaty. The administration of former President George W. Bush began talks with China on a BIT, but they were put on hold after Obama took office in 2009.

"Business people have been telling the administration that this is important and that they have been waiting too long and they need to get moving on it," said Bill Reinsch, president of the National Foreign Trade Council, whose members include Boeing, Caterpillar and Microsoft.

Andrea Mead, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Trade Representative's office, said the U.S.-China meeting provided "an opportunity to discuss next steps on our negotiations now that the United States has released its new model BIT."

The United States and other countries negotiate bilateral investment treaties to protect their companies against potentially unfair foreign government actions, as well as to open up new business opportunities.

There are some 3,000 BITS in force around the world, of which the United States is party to around 40.

Camp said he was relieved the administration's review was over and hoped it signaled an end to the "administration's self-imposed paralysis in negotiating such agreements."

Like many U.S. business groups, he also expressed concern the administration's decision to seek expanded protections for the environment and workers rights in future BITs could make it much harder to negotiate the investment pacts.

Camp said the White House also should continue to push China to move more quickly to a market-determined exchange rate, a long-term irritant in U.S.-China economic relations.

China has allowed its currency to rise in recent years. But many U.S. lawmakers believe it is still undervalued, giving the Chinese an unfair price advantage in international trade.

(Reporting By Doug Palmer; Editing by Vicki Allen, Eric Beech and Dan Grebler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
morbas wrote:
Let China Set our import fee,
Import fee in the USA shouold be set at 99% the rate of the originator of corresponding imported goods. In the case of goods made from multiple components of multiple countries, thusly the 99% fee will be set by the component of highest import fee of corresponding origin. The highest origin import fee shall be tersely defined with prejudice of any handling of said component(s).

Apr 26, 2012 12:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
morbas wrote:
Let China set our import fee based on their prejudices,
Import fee in the USA should be set at 99% the rate of the originator of corresponding imported goods. In the case of goods made from multiple components of multiple countries, the 99% fee should be set by the component of highest import fee of corresponding origin. The highest origin import fee should be tersely defined with prejudice of any handling of said component(s).

Apr 26, 2012 12:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.