ACLU sues over Border Patrol stops in Pacific Northwest

SEATTLE Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:27am EDT

Related Topics

SEATTLE (Reuters) - The Border Patrol is unjustifiably stopping people based on their skin color in Washington state's Olympic Peninsula, just across the water from Canada, the American Civil Liberties Union said in a lawsuit filed on Thursday.

Two Latinos and a black man - two of them prison corrections officers - said in the complaint filed in U.S. federal court in Seattle that they were subject to racial profiling. One of the officers was in his uniform when he was stopped, the lawsuit said.

The accusations against the U.S. Border Patrol come as the agency has sought in recent years to bolster its enforcement along the northern border with Canada, to guard against illegal immigration and possible infiltration by Islamist militants.

"The Border Patrol's actions have created a climate of fear and anxiety for many people living on the Olympic Peninsula," Sarah Dunne, legal director of ACLU of Washington state, said in a statement.

"The residents in this suit all are U.S. citizens who worry that they could be stopped and questioned without reason any time they drive or are passengers in cars," Dunne said.

The Olympic Peninsula is a 3,600-square-mile (5,800-square-km)area in northwest Washington state, across the Strait of Juan de Fuca from Canada's Vancouver Island.

In the past decade, the number of Border Patrol agents at Port Angeles, at the north end of the peninsula and with ferry service to Vancouver Island, has increased to 43 from three, said Matt Adams, legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, which joined the ACLU in the suit. Port Angeles is 80 miles northwest of Seattle.

The increase followed the 1999 arrest of Algerian Islamist militant Ahmed Ressam, who was stopped at Port Angeles after driving off a car ferry from Victoria in a vehicle filled with explosives he had planned to detonate at Los Angeles International Airport.

Richard Sinks, a spokesman for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said his agency "strictly prohibits profiling" based on race or religion.

"In determining whether individuals are admissible into the United States, (Customs and Border Protection) utilizes specific facts and follows the Department of Justice's 'Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies,'" Sinks said in a statement.

The ACLU was seeking class-action status for the lawsuit, so it would apply to other residents of the Olympic Peninsula. The complaint details the experiences of plaintiffs Jose Sanchez, Ismael Contreras and Ernest Grimes. Sanchez and Grimes are corrections officers, and Contreras is a high school student.

The lawsuit said that Grimes, who is black, was traveling in a car last year when he was stopped by a Border Patrol agent who approached with his hand on his holster and asked Grimes about his immigration status. Grimes was "wearing his correctional officer uniform at the time of this stop," the complaint said.

For each plaintiff, the complaint accused the Border Patrol of conducting the stop because the individual was "a person of color based on his complexion and hair color."

(Writing by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (9)
kcly wrote:
Thank you very much. Few of my friends were stopped in the middle of nowhere (closer to Tenesse side) in Virginia for random immigration check (obviously they are “brown”). This goes against so many American values and the concept of “Freedom” and so man things that Republicans should be up in arms if they really cared. Anyways, Kudos to ACLU.

Apr 26, 2012 12:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Oh brother!We weren’t there & the agents probably had a different reason for the check.Let the BP protect us the way they are trained

Apr 26, 2012 12:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
It’s an unpopular viewpoint, but let’s actually look at the ridiculousness of those obsessed with anti-profiling. It is a valuable, law enforcement tool, that makes total sense, and should be used wherever and whenever possible.

All air travelers are forced to go through a Security Screening, at the airport. Why, because they have been PROFILED and found to be “AIR TRAVELERS”, every one of them. Not only that, but the fact that they are AIR TRAVELERS, is the only reason that they are put through that degrading experience.

Apr 27, 2012 8:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.