Oakland police may face sanctions over handling of Occupy protests

Wed May 2, 2012 12:24am EDT

Occupy Oakland demonstrators and police stand their ground during a standoff on May Day in front of City Hall in Frank Ogawa Plaza in Oakland, California, May 1, 2012. REUTERS/Beck Diefenbach

Occupy Oakland demonstrators and police stand their ground during a standoff on May Day in front of City Hall in Frank Ogawa Plaza in Oakland, California, May 1, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Beck Diefenbach

Related Topics

(Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the city of Oakland and its police department to submit a plan within a week to address a backlog of complaints stemming from their handling of Occupy protests, threatening sanctions if they fail to do so.

The mandate by District Judge Thelton Henderson follows the release of a report by an outside monitor that said Oakland police used "an overwhelming military-type response" to the demonstrations.

The report also confirmed, for the first time from an official source, that an Oakland police SWAT team member fired a beanbag round at an Iraq war veteran during clashes in October.

Former U.S. Marine Scott Olsen was critically wounded by what protesters said at the time was a tear gas canister fired by police.

Olsen's case reinvigorated the Occupy movement against economic inequality, and the confrontations with police in subsequent protests turned Oakland into a focal point for the movement as demonstrators rallied against what they described as police brutality.

Thousands of protesters took to the streets of Oakland on Tuesday as part a nationwide movement against economic inequality. Demonstrators clashed with police, who fired multiple rounds of tear gas and flash bang grenades. At least nine people were arrested.

The Oakland Police Department has been subject to court-ordered external monitoring and review since the 2003 settlement of what was known as the Riders case, in which four officers were accused of planting evidence, fabricating police reports and using unlawful force, according to the Oakland police.

"It would be problematic enough if, as seems inevitable, (Oakland police's) compliance levels were to backslide as a result of their failure to address the Occupy Oakland complaints in a timely fashion," Henderson wrote in his three-page written order.

"Such failures would be further indication that, despite the changed leadership at the City of Oakland and its police department, (Oakland police) might still lack the will, capacity, or both to complete the reforms to which they so long ago agreed," he wrote.

Henderson said that if officials fail to submit the plan by next week and implement it by May 14, "the court will consider appropriate sanctions, including the imposition of daily or weekly monetary sanctions, until compliance is achieved."

Oakland police officials announced last week that the department was making significant changes to how it trains officers to control large crowds following criticism over its practices during Occupy Oakland protests that sometimes turned violent. It received more than 1,000 misconduct complaints during those protests.

(Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
cmeeusen wrote:
Those of us who witnessed the police today in Oakland will be calling the mayor and the Chief of Police tomorrow, to report the abuses we witnessed, to register, once again, our anger and dismay, and they will have an even longer list of calls to return. They aren’t getting the message.

May 02, 2012 2:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
harvey57 wrote:
I’ve got a lousy 12 dollar an hour job I’ve got to be at 6 days a week so I don’t really have the time to be out in the streets marching….But I sympathize with these occupy wall street people. The American taxpayer footed the the money to bail out wall street and these to big to fail banks that were going under….and from what I understand it’s just business as usual with the whole bunch of them. I live in Oregon and watched the marching in Portland on the news this morning and from what I saw it was also business as usual in the Portland Police departmnent with their gustapo type crowd control. No wonder people are so pissed off. GOD BLESS “WE THE PEOPLE.” That’s AMERICA to the rest of you greedy no good so n so’s.

May 02, 2012 10:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
harvey57 wrote:
I’ve got a lousy 12 dollar an hour job I’ve got to be at 6 days a week so I don’t really have the time to be out in the streets marching….But I sympathize with these occupy wall street people. The American taxpayer footed the the money to bail out wall street and these to big to fail banks that were going under….and from what I understand it’s just business as usual with the whole bunch of them. I live in Oregon and watched the marching in Portland on the news this morning and from what I saw it was also business as usual in the Portland Police departmnent with their gustapo type crowd control. No wonder people are so pissed off. GOD BLESS “WE THE PEOPLE.” That’s AMERICA to the rest of you greedy no good so n so’s.

May 02, 2012 10:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus