Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Khamenei factions look set to dominate in Iran vote

Related Topics

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) meets with members of the Assembly of Experts in Tehran March 8, 2012. REUTERS/Khamenei.ir/Handout

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) meets with members of the Assembly of Experts in Tehran March 8, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Khamenei.ir/Handout

DUBAI | Fri May 4, 2012 2:44pm EDT

DUBAI (Reuters) - Iranians voted on Friday in a run-off parliamentary election in which allies of hardline Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hoped to complete victory over President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a conservative increasingly criticized by the clerical elite.

Khamenei's expected majority is likely to mean a tougher final year for Ahmadinejad in his second and last term.

With reformists mostly sidelined and opposition leaders under house arrest, the vote is a test of the popularity of Khamenei's clerical establishment rather than an opportunity for fundamental change in the way the Islamic Republic is run.

Sixty-five of parliament's 290 seats are being contested after Khamenei loyalists led the first round in March. More than 50 percent of seats have already been filled by new members, including a large number of independents, so the Iranian Majles is undergoing an extensive face-lift.

The election will have no major impact on Tehran's nuclear row with the West or its foreign affairs, which are already determined by Khamenei.

Its significance lies in gauging just how deep the rivalry between supreme leader and president has become and it could also throw light on possible contenders for next year's presidential elections.

Among the five candidates who have already secured seats in Tehran, Gholam-Ali Haddad Adel, a key ally of Khamenei and father-in-law to his son Mojtaba, won most votes.

"We have to wait for the factions to be formed before we can see what happened. But whatever happens the next parliament will not give him (Ahmadinejad) an easy ride. I doubt he'll be very happy," said analyst Mohammad Marandi of Tehran University.

COMPLEX SYSTEM

The United Front of Principalists - an alliance of conservative group tied to the Supreme Leader - was the largest entity in the first round but analysts say Iran's political system makes it tricky to forecast candidates' allegiance.

"This list contains many Ahmadinejad critics ... but many of its candidates are newbies whose true political leaning is uncertain. As such, we don't know how they will necessarily behave," said Iran analyst Reza Esfandiari.

"Political groupings in Iran are not disciplined, and there is no 'whip' in the Iranian parliamentary system that coerces MPs to act one way or the other," he added.

The waters are muddied by the fact that many successful candidates appeared on the lists of both the pro-Khamenei Principlist Front and the equally hardline, pro-Ahmadinejad Resistance Front, making it difficult to fathom who can count more on the lawmaker in question.

The political persuasion of more than 70 independent candidates elected in the first is also unknown.

"Many of them are from small provinces and are not known politically. But some have been supported by Ahmadinejad during the campaign and so they will very likely tend to support him," said Sadeq Zibakalam, an Iranian professor of political science.

AHMADINEJAD'S LAST STAND

Khamenei swiftly endorsed Ahmadinejad's re-election in 2009, rejecting opposition allegations of widespread fraud that led to eight months of unrest.

But a rift opened between the two leaders when Ahmadinejad made several key policy decisions that his critics said were not in line with the supreme leader and undermined the leading political role of clergy.

Even before the current election, Ahmadinejad was already regularly criticized by parliament and, in March, he became the first president in the Islamic Republic's history to be summoned to the assembly for questioning.

Parliament, which has the power to impeach the president, accused him of economic mismanagement and making illegal appointments.

In the past months, dozens of Ahmadinejad allies have been detained or dismissed from their posts for being linked to a "deviant current" that his rivals say aims to sideline clerics.

Ahmadinejad has inflicted hardship on Iranians, critics say, through soaring inflation caused in part by slashing food and fuel subsidies.

Iran is also under ever-tightening economic sanctions driven by western countries that believe Tehran may be developing nuclear weapons technology, something it denies. It also faces the threat of Israeli military strikes on its nuclear sites.

Tehran resumed nuclear talks with major powers in mid-April after more than a year. A second round of talks is scheduled for May 23 in Baghdad.

Polling stations in 33 constituencies opened at 8 a.m. (0330 GMT) and closed at 9 p.m., electoral official Hassanali Nouri told state media.

Khamenei had called for a high turnout.

"My suggestion is that they (people) should take the second round as seriously as the first round. The higher the number of votes for lawmakers ... the better they can work," state television quoted him as saying after he cast his vote.

One voter, a young man identified only by his first name of Alireza, told state television: "I will vote because my vote will be a defeat for Iran's enemies."

Turnout in the first round of parliamentary election was 64 percent. The interior ministry has said final results were expected within 24 hours after the polls close.

The new parliament convenes on May 27.

(Reporting and writing by Zahra Hosseinian; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
AtypicalMale wrote:
“My vote will be a defeat for Iran’s enemies”, the one young man said.

For that to actually be a truthful statement, a person’s vote would need to be AGAINST the repressive clerics, their Revolutionary Guard henchmen, and their ‘puppet rulers’ the ilk of which Ahmadinejad has been until recently. That corrupt collective very possibly robbed Mousavi of a presidential victory in 2009.

The greatest hope for Iran lies in its youth; the aging, oppressively-minded clerics will be dying more frequently with the passage of time, and along with them (any civilized person would hope) their draconian ‘leadership’ mentalities and methods may fall by the wayside.

May 04, 2012 10:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fromkin wrote:
What you say is more true for the US and Saudi Arabia.(Any civilized person would think)

Saudi Arabia ruling family memebers are litteraly frequently on life supportin the US and the US congress have members who are 80 to 100 years old who “will be dying more frequentky with the passage of time”

As for Amadinejad being a puppet, Bush was a puppet to the MIC and obama is a puppet to FIC(Financial industrial complex).

Clean your house first please.

May 04, 2012 12:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
xcanada2 wrote:
We have the rather amusing situation whereby Ahmadinejad, the actual elected President of Iran, has been so demonized by Western propaganda, that we can take pleasure when the clerics trounce him.

Boy, we sure know how to mix things up!

To the extent Iranians are ruled by clerics (presumably with some moral principles), and we are ruled by the financial and Zionist elites, then who is in the better position? Small minded financials mostly believe that their greed is what is good for everyone, and the Zionists believe anything goes in their quest for ME territory; for example, assassination of scientists, and world endangerment.

We also have (had?) some good moral principles, but mostly seem to have forgotten them in our world hegemony quest; you know the list of our evil deeds.

May 04, 2012 2:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.