Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Tornado chasers

Storm chasers brave danger and debris as they try to capture photos of tornadoes' destructive power.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Russia talk of pre-emptive strike unjustified: NATO

Related Topics

1 of 2. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (C) gestures during a meeting with military officials in the Kaliningrad region November 29, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Mikhail Klimentyev/RIA Novosti/Kremlin

BERLIN | Fri May 4, 2012 3:41pm EDT

BERLIN (Reuters) - A Kremlin threat to launch pre-emptive strikes on a planned NATO missile defense system in Europe is unjustified as the system poses no threat to Russia's security, the head of the Atlantic alliance said on Friday.

NATO has long insisted that the anti-missile shield it is developing is aimed at protecting member states from a possible Iranian attack, but Russia says it fears the system could undermine the effectiveness of its own nuclear arsenal.

In a stark warning head of Vladimir Putin's return to the presidency next week, Russia's military chief-of-staff said on Thursday that Moscow could carry out pre-emptive strikes on NATO missile defense installations.

"These statements are unjustified," NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said in Berlin after talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

"Our missile defense system is not technically designed to threaten Russia in any way and we have provided that information to the Russians. Politically, we don't have any intention to attack Russia," he added.

NATO has invited Russia to cooperate on missile defense and they have shared defense interests, Rasmussen said, adding that NATO and Moscow had signed a pact 15 years ago pledging they would not use force against one another.

"The best way for the Russians to see with their own eyes that our system is not directed against them would be to cooperate actively," he said.

"We will continue our dialogue with Russia and I hope one day in the future we will reach an agreement."

General Nikolai Makarov, Russia's military chief of staff, told an international conference in Moscow on Thursday: "Decisions on the pre-emptive use of ... attack components will be taken in the period of heightening tension."

COOPERATION OR CONFRONTATION

Testy exchanges between the Russian hosts and U.S. and NATO officials at the conference exposed how far apart the old Cold War foes remain on the terms of a deal that would allow them to cooperate on missile defense, an arrangement both say they want.

The missile defense system is due to be completed in four phases by about 2020 and is to include interceptor missiles based in Poland and Romania.

President Dmitry Medvedev has warned previously that Russia could attack the sites if necessary, after first deploying new weapons in regions of Russia close by.

Moscow says the West will gain the ability to shoot down Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in about 2018, weakening Russia's nuclear deterrent.

Makarov said European states should decide whether protection against a possible future threat from nations such as Iran was worth the risk of facing down Russian weapons that would pose a "real threat" to countries hosting the facilities.

NATO will hold a summit in Chicago on May 20-21 at which the shield's first phase is to be declared up and running.

Russia said on Friday it was "ready for practical cooperation" on missile defense but urged NATO to change its plans and repeated its demand for legally binding guarantees the system is not aimed against it.

"We want to be heard," Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said at a weekly briefing.

He said he hoped "the signals Makarov and other military leaders sent" would help "participants in the Chicago summit understand the seriousness of the situation and rework their thinking about the further development of this system."

(Reporting by Alexandra Hudson; Additional reporting by Alexei Anishchuk in Moscow; Editing by Andrew Osborn and Robin Pomeroy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (16)
FatherJames wrote:
…This is raw political grandstanding. In the first half of 1967 the Russians claimed that Israel was massed on the Golan, preparing to overrun Syria. The Israelis had a near pacifist PM at that time… Israel offered to let the Soviet Ambassador and his military advisors tour the entire line to prove that nothing was going on…
…Moscow ordered him to refuse… Just trying to stir the pot… So Syria called on Egypt for help, Egypt kicked the UN Peacekeepers out of the Sinai and moved up troops to the Israeli border… Blockaded Israel in Red Sea… Nasser at first probably did not want a fight (too many of his best troops on loan) but he got carried away with rhetoric and suddenly he was swept up into the maelstrom…
…Israel forced to mobilize… which would quickly destroy economy… Fighting started and bad Mideast situation became worse…
…All this because the Russians stirred the pot. This time they are playing a far more dangerous game…

May 04, 2012 12:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
nvonr wrote:
So, Russia tells the United States that the missile shield that Russia will build in Mexico or maybe Cuba is of no threat to them. It is only going to be used to protect Russia and its allies from a rogue nation such as Pakistan who is already missile capable, nuclear capable and very unstable.
Russia says that it has no intention of using the missiles against the United States, and everyone in America will say “OK” Russia we believe you and everything is just peachy keen.
Intelligent and rational people know that Iran has neither the capability or intention to attack the United States with a nuclear missile. This missile shield is a very destabilizing plan which will lead us into more confrontation. Maybe that is what some people want?

May 04, 2012 12:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
Russia’s “hawk like” statement may be nothing more than political bluster, preceding Putin’s return as PM. I don’t see what, if any, political payoff there is for the Kremlin, in throwing stumbling blocks in the path of improving ties with the US/NATO countries. In fact, Russia, it appears to me, is under a more eminent threat, from China’s growing military spend.

With the “West’s” hands, more than full, with struggles in the Arab/Muslim world, I really can’t imagine much anti-Russian skullduggery going on.

May 04, 2012 12:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.