Republican Santorum endorses Romney for president

WASHINGTON Tue May 8, 2012 9:14am EDT

File photo of U.S. former Republican presidential hopeful Senator Rick Santorum. REUTERS/Tom Gannam

File photo of U.S. former Republican presidential hopeful Senator Rick Santorum.

Credit: Reuters/Tom Gannam

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum endorsed his one-time fierce rival Mitt Romney on Monday, a move that may help the party's presumptive White House nominee win over religious conservatives.

Santorum said in an unusual late-night statement that the two have differences, but that he came away from a meeting with the ex-Massachusetts governor impressed with Romney's "deep understanding" of economic and family issues central to the campaign.

"Above all else, we both agree that President (Barack) Obama must be defeated. The task will not be easy. It will require all hands on deck if our nominee is to be victorious," Santorum said.

"Governor Romney will be that nominee and he has my endorsement and support to win this the most critical election of our lifetime," he said in the statement, which was emailed to supporters.

The socially conservative former Pennsylvania senator, who won 11 state contests and was the favorite of Republican voters in a Reuters/Ipsos poll for the No. 2 spot on the ticket, is best known for his strong opposition to abortion and gay rights.

He clashed sharply with Romney in several televised debates, but his support may now help Romney win over religious conservatives before the November 6 election.

Santorum had been reluctant to give an endorsement, but he said that changed after a "clear-the-air" meeting with Romney in Pittsburgh on Friday. The question of endorsement did not come up, but Santorum said the conversation was candid and focused on issues.

"During our meeting I felt a deep responsibility to assess Governor Romney's commitment to addressing the issues most important to conservatives, as well his commitment to ensuring our appropriate representation in a Romney administration," he said.

"The family and its foundational role in America's economic success, a central point of our campaign, was discussed at length. I was impressed with the governor's deep understanding of this connection and his commitment to economic policies that preserve and strengthen families."

Santorum said he agreed with Romney on "the need for lower taxes, smaller government, and a reduction in out-of-control spending. We certainly agree that abortion is wrong and marriage should be between one man and one woman."

(Reporting By John Crawley; Editing by Jackie Frank and Christopher Wilson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (56)
Prairiefire wrote:
Wow… I feel better now… The two wackos of the Repubs party indorse Romney… Can you say I want VP endorsement…

May 07, 2012 12:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
EFS wrote:
There’s that misleadingly catch-phrase about lower taxes from the right again meant to fool the electorate….which it often does thanks to bad media reports, deliberately so or not. The Republicans trumpet this call for lower taxes by which is meant super rich and corporations only? All their votes in Congress and Senate show this is the case. The resistance to closing loopholes shows this. Not to recognise this at this point is either being part of this hoodwinking or denial or part of the rampant hate campaign. Indeed, I can find almost no comments supporting the GOP any longer which aren’t filled with irrational personal hatred toward Obama regardless of facts. The logical conclusion one draws is that there ARE no reasonable arguments left favoring their position so supporters most resort to hatred and fanaticism, and this from those who often like to claim a virtual monopoly on patriotism! What, we’re not a country led by hate-mongers and intolerance? We’re going to vote in a party that at least implicitly sanctions such hate-monger? Sound familiar? Scary indeed.

May 08, 2012 6:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
And getting this endorsement helps him how? I wonder how many millions it cost to buy his endorsement?

May 08, 2012 6:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.