GSK goes hostile with $2.6 billion Human Genome offer

LONDON Wed May 9, 2012 4:53pm EDT

Signage is pictured on the company headquarters of GlaxoSmithKline in west London. REUTERS/Toby Melville

Signage is pictured on the company headquarters of GlaxoSmithKline in west London.

Credit: Reuters/Toby Melville

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - GlaxoSmithKline will take its $2.6 billion bid for long-time partner Human Genome Sciences direct to shareholders this week, after its takeover offer was rejected last month by the U.S. biotech group's board.

The decision to go hostile with the $13-a-share cash tender offer sets up GSK for a potentially lengthy battle with those Human Genome investors who believe it is not offering enough.

"They will do fantastically well out of this - at $13 it is a steal," said Mark Evans, a fund manager at Taube Hodson Stonex, the sixth largest investor in Human Genome with a 5.6 percent stake. "I still think it is very likely that they will have to pay more."

A Reuters poll of 13 analysts found that on average they believe the deal will get done at about $15 per share.

GSK and the U.S. pioneer of gene-based drug discovery together sell Benlysta, a new drug for the autoimmune condition lupus, and they are collaborating on two other experimental drugs in late-stage trials for diabetes and heart disease that could become significant sellers.

Buying Human Genome would give GSK full rights to these partnered drugs, underscoring the appetite among big drugmakers for biotech products to refill their medicine chests.

Human Genome's board spurned the approach from Britain's biggest drugmaker on April 19, saying it did not reflect the company's inherent value. GSK insists its bid, at an 81 percent premium to the price on April 18, is full and fair.

Many investors anticipate a modest improvement from GSK to clinch the deal. A sweetener helped Roche win full control of Genentech in 2009 - another biotech takeover battle involving two long-standing partners - and Sanofi also improved its offer to win Genzyme last year.

Human Genome shares closed 3 cents lower at $14.59 on Nasdaq after the company advised its shareholders to take no action while it considers the offer. It will give its recommendation within 10 business days of GSK commencing its tender.

The stock while above GSK's bid is still only half the peak touched in April last year, when investors' hopes were higher for Benlysta.

A spokeswoman for GSK declined to say exactly when this week the tender, which will stay open for 20 business days, would be launched. The standard practice is for tender offers to proceed only if the buyer gets a majority of the shares, but there is scope to extend or amend the offer.

GSK stock closed down 1 percent, broadly in line with a 1.1 percent fall in the London FTSE 100 index, after it announced the planned tender offer on Wednesday.

NO NEED TO JOIN REVIEW PROCESS

Human Genome has hired Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse to explore strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of the company, and has invited GSK to join the process.

But GSK, which is being advised by Lazard and Morgan Stanley, said it would not participate in that strategic review.

"GSK's participation in the process is unnecessary as its offer is not conditioned on due diligence or financing and can be completed expeditiously," it said in a statement.

"It is important for HGS shareholders to understand that GSK is committed to proceeding with its offer."

GSK's partnership with the Rockville, Maryland-based company goes back two decades, and even though the deals between the two companies have no tricky change-of-control clauses, analysts doubt another company will emerge as a "white knight" bidder.

Any non-GSK acquirer would only get partial control of the key drugs, which could make it an unappetizing target.

GSK and Human Genome share rights to Benlysta, but GSK is in charge of developing both the new heart drug darapladib and albiglutide for diabetes. As a result, the British-based company already has a dominant economic interest in these two drugs.

HOLDING THE CARDS

"Glaxo holds a lot of the cards in this story," said Navid Malik, an analyst at Cenkos Securities.

"I think Glaxo will have to raise its offer but probably not significantly ... the right price for shareholders in Human Genome would be in the mid to high-teens (dollars per share)."

Many shareholders bought into Human Genome when the shares surged from some $3 in July 2009 after impressive clinical trials results with Benlysta, when they may have paid around $15-18 a share.

The latest ownership filings show the top 10 investors in Human Genome together own 78 percent of the shares, giving them a vital say in determining the company's fate. However, heavy trading since the offer became public has brought in new arbitrageurs hoping to exploit the bid situation.

Drugmakers around the world are seeking deals to get new drugs into the pipeline as older products lose patent protection, and GSK's bid for Human Genome is the latest in a recent wave of takeover activity in the biotechnology sector.

AstraZeneca last month agreed to buy Ardea Biosciences for $1.26 billion to access a promising gout drug, while Roche made an ultimately unsuccessful bid for gene sequencing firm Illumina in January.

GSK said its preference was to complete the deal on "a friendly basis in a timely fashion" and it remained willing to discuss its offer with Human Genome at any time, but that shareholders should have the opportunity to decide for themselves on the merits of its $2.6 billion offer.

(Additional reporting by Soyoung Kim and Bill Berkrot in New York; Editing by Will Waterman, Philippa Fletcher, Janet McBride and Leslie Gevirtz)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
editorsynergy wrote:
there is no such thing as overpriced when we are talking about evolution

May 09, 2012 5:59am EDT  --  Report as abuse
droslovinia wrote:
Nice to see that someone can bid so much in order to gain unfettered control over the lives of so many suffering people.

May 09, 2012 1:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures