GM, Chrysler would have sunk under Romney: Obama

WASHINGTON Thu May 10, 2012 12:32pm EDT

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during an interview with ''Good Morning America'' co-anchor Robin Roberts in this still image taken from video released on May 9, 2012. REUTERS/ABC News' Robin Roberts/Handout

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during an interview with ''Good Morning America'' co-anchor Robin Roberts in this still image taken from video released on May 9, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/ABC News' Robin Roberts/Handout

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama dismissed Mitt Romney's comments this week claiming credit for the recovery of the U.S. auto industry, saying his Republican rival's plan would have sunk General Motors Co and Chrysler Group LLC.

There was no private sector option to save the car makers in 2009 and Romney's stance would have cost many jobs, Obama, who is seeking a second term in office, told ABC News in an interview that aired on Thursday.

"I think this is one of his Etch-a-Sketch moments. I don't think anybody takes that seriously," Obama said, referring to a drawing toy that resets when shaken. The toy gained renewed prominence when it was cited by a Romney aide earlier this year.

The Romney campaign called the Democratic president's comments an attempt to distract attention from his performance on the economy.

"People remember his position, which was, "Let's let Detroit go bankrupt," and his opposition to government involvement in making sure that GM and Chrysler didn't go under," Obama said in the interview taped on Wednesday, referring to the headline of a newspaper opinion piece Romney wrote in 2008.

"Had we followed his advice, at that time, GM and Chrysler would have gone under. And we would have lost probably a million jobs throughout the Midwest."

Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, opposed Obama's 2009 bailout of General Motors and Chrysler. His father had run an auto company and was a popular governor of Michigan, homebase to the city of Detroit and the U.S. automotive industry.

Amanda Henneberg, a spokeswoman for the Romney campaign, said in an e-mailed statement: "With millions of Americans suffering in the Obama economy, it's no surprise that President Obama would resort to negative attacks in an attempt to distract Americans from his abysmal record."

She defended Romney's proposal as "the right course for the automakers - a structured bankruptcy process to allow them to emerge as sustainable and profitable enterprises."

On Monday, Romney - a former business executive and one-time governor of Massachusetts - told an ABC affiliate that he had "pushed the idea of a managed bankruptcy, and finally when that was done and help was given, the companies got back on their feet."

"So I'll take a lot of credit for the fact that this industry's come back," Romney said hours before making a speech at a local university in Michigan, according to ABC News.

Obama said the issue highlighted the differences between him and his challenger in the November 6 election.

"There is gonna be a fundamental difference. I think the auto example is just one of many differences that we're gonna have on the economy," Obama said.

In 2009, Obama led a controversial $80 billion bailout of the automakers. A year earlier, Romney penned an opinion piece calling for the companies to go bankrupt that has dogged him on the campaign trail, particularly in Michigan.

Chrysler Group LLC is now majority-owned and managed by Italy's Fiat SpA. Both GM and Chrysler have moved from the government-funded bankruptcies to renewed profits.

(Reporting By Susan Heavey; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (16)
militaryusaf wrote:
The President is absolutely right!!

May 10, 2012 11:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
shrimpaycheck wrote:
this would have been a completely good thing though if the companies had sank…considering, you know, that part of CAPITALISM is FAILING. The bailout was on of the worst decisions Obama made. Yes it saved millions of jobs but intervening in a system that is supposed to have failures has/had HUGE reprecussions.

May 10, 2012 11:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Steve6789 wrote:
GM and any company that is about to go under – SHOULD!!! The company that goes under is not operating as it should and thus should go under, and have people resources reallocated to properly functioning entities, or at least have these failed companies raise private capital under sound operating principles and re-hire. Instead, Obama has robbed the public to support utterly dysfunctional and corrupt corporations eliminating any moral risk to the company and allowing their execs to grow fat under the robbery of the common man.

May 10, 2012 11:42am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.