Exclusive: Monster deal heats up, LinkedIn to pass: sources

NEW YORK Fri May 11, 2012 6:56pm EDT

The sign up page of Linkedin.com is seen in Singapore, May 20, 2011. REUTERS/David Loh

The sign up page of Linkedin.com is seen in Singapore, May 20, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/David Loh

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Monster Worldwide Inc (MWW.N) has drawn interest from a number of potential buyers, including private equity firm Silver Lake Partners, although at least one would-be suitor, LinkedIn Corp (LNKD.N), has decided not to pursue a deal after an initial look, according to people familiar with the matter.

A source close to the LinkedIn said the company had decided not to pursue Monster after an assessment this week.

Monster shares closed up 19 percent at $9.33 on the New York Stock Exchange, giving it a market value of about $1.1 billion.

LinkedIn shares finished down 3.4 percent to $107.23 after Reuters reported on Friday afternoon that the social media company expressed interest in a potential deal for the Internet jobs-search company.

Monster, which runs Monster.com and HotJobs.com Websites, said in March it retained Stone Key Partners and Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAC.N) to review strategic alternatives, including selling all or part of the company.

New York-based Monster has since received expressions of interest from several strategic and financial buyers, the sources said. The company plans to send out financial information to the interested parties by the end of next week, they said.

The sources did not wish to be quoted by name because the process is private.

Representatives for Monster, LinkedIn and Silver Lake declined to comment. Stone Key Partners and Bank of America had no immediate comment.

The sale talks come as Monster's model of job ads is facing new competition from social media such as Facebook and LinkedIn, as well as several other rivals in an industry where the barriers to entry are low. The company said in January it would cut 7 percent of its staff, or 400 jobs.

Monster's 2012 share of online recruitment is estimated at 23 percent, below CareerBuilder.com's 32 percent, but ahead of LinkedIn's 16 percent. The online recruitment market is estimated at more than $5 billion.

Monster, which bought rival HotJobs.com in 2010, also competes with operators of specialized job sites, such as Dice Holdings Inc (DHX.N), which focuses on financial, IT and other sectors, and with hundreds of small operators.

Aggregators of listings, such as SimplyHired.com and Indeed.com, have also emerged as rivals.

Online jobs firms have also been buffeted by broader macro-economic challenges as have the traditional staffing companies such as ManpowerGroup Inc (MAN.N) and Robert Half International Inc (RHI.N). The industry has seen a recovery in U.S. demand for workers, but softer staffing markets in Europe.

Monster has been fighting back with new technology initiatives, including Power Resume Search that makes it possible to identify workers with specific skills and BeKnown that allows employers to reach candidates via Facebook. That "app" could make it easier to find so-called passive job candidates who are currently employed.

SunTrust Robinson Humphrey analyst Tobey Sommer said recent U.S. job trends also make the company more attractive. The types of jobs being created in the current U.S. labor recovery play to Monster's strength in mid-level job categories, he said.

Monster would be a good fit for online professional networks such as LinkedIn or job boards such as CareerBuilder, BMO analyst Jeff Silber said in a research note on Friday.

"Given management's relatively open-ended comments, we believe there are a wide range of potential outcomes," he said.

(Reporting by Nadia Damouni, Soyoung Kim and Greg Roumeliotis in New York; additional reporting by Nick Zieminski; editing by Tim Dobbyn, Paritosh Bansal, Carol Bishopric and Andre Grenon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
RecruiterGuy wrote:
I began recruiting online in 1993 with Bill Warren’s first online job board – Online Career Center (OCC). Later I encouraged many clients to sign up with Monster. My feeling is that Monster has moved away from its core business and value to corporate/third party seasoned recruiters. Its strength was as a resume depository and search engine. Now it has changed its focus (in my perception) to try to be all things to all people – something that obviously does not work.

One area that is not Monster’s fault is the candidates’ perception that commercial and corporate job boards are “black holes”. Since networking still is the best way to find a job, by many percentage points, people are encouraged to network instead of “Post and Pray”.

May 18, 2012 10:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.