Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Former editor says Murdoch sowed seeds of hacking scandal

Related Topics

A still image from broadcast footage shows News Corporation Chief Executive and Chairman, Rupert Murdoch, speaking at the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the media, at the High Court in London April 26, 2012. REUTERS/POOL via Reuters TV

A still image from broadcast footage shows News Corporation Chief Executive and Chairman, Rupert Murdoch, speaking at the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the media, at the High Court in London April 26, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/POOL via Reuters TV

LONDON | Thu May 17, 2012 10:39pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Rupert Murdoch sowed the seeds of the phone hacking scandal that has tarnished his reputation by forcing Britain's most respected newspapers into "a Faustian bargain" with the powerful, a former editor of the UK's Times newspaper said on Thursday.

Harry Evans told a British media inquiry how as editor of the Times he battled attempts by Murdoch to compel him to support British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

At the Leveson inquiry last month, Murdoch denied influencing the editorial stance of the Times papers. News Corp could not be immediately reached for comment on Evans' comments.

Evans is now editor at large for Reuters, which is owned by Thomson Reuters. The Thomson family, who owned the Times and the Sunday Times before Murdoch acquired them, controls Thomson Reuters.

Expressing disgust at a fall in journalistic standards that he said Murdoch helped stoke by fostering a culture of trifling scandal, Evans said reporters needed principles to prevent them getting too close to the powerful.

"It's a Faustian bargain when you get too intimate with politicians, it serves neither the politicians or the press well for the relationship to get to be one of complicity," Evans, 83, told the inquiry in the High Court.

"What happened in 1981 is entirely relevant to today, it's a manifestation of the same culture of too close a connection between a powerful media group and politicians," Evans said of his experience working as Times editor.

Evans edited the Sunday Times from 1967-1981. He agreed to edit the Times when offered the job by Murdoch but he only lasted a year. He stood down in 1982 in protest against what he saw as Murdoch's interference in editorial policy.

(Additional reporting by Estelle Shirbon; Editing by Martin Howell and John Mair)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
Bunker555 wrote:
The evils that Murdoch has committed to blackmail people in power, is coming home to roost. Can clearly see the toning down of rhetoric by the media outlets he owns in the United States. The blatant lies “reported” as “news” on his Fox News cable channel, needs to be investigated by the FCC.

May 17, 2012 10:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
OmarMinyawi wrote:
In many third world countries and regimes, the government controls the media and then they work together to control the masses. But in many well-established democracies, like the case above, the strong rich and powerful media controls the government and in many case they work together to control and manipulate the masses. Choose and pick your favorite scenario.

May 17, 2012 11:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
OmarMinyawi wrote:
In many third world countries and regimes, the government controls the media and then they work together to control the masses. But in many well-established democracies, like the case above, the strong rich and powerful media controls the government and in many case they work together to control and manipulate the masses. Choose and pick your favorite scenario.

May 17, 2012 11:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.