Facebook advised analysts to cut forecasts before float

Wed May 23, 2012 1:43am EDT

(Reuters) - As Facebook officials traveled the country to talk up the company's $16 billion initial public offering this month, the social networking giant advised analysts for underwriters to reduce revenue and earnings forecasts, said people with direct knowledge.

Facebook decided to tell analysts to cut estimates due to feedback during the investor roadshow which revealed users were opting for mobile devices which generate less advertising revenue and after consulting with its adviser Morgan Stanley

"Facebook backed off and said, 'Hey get your models down.'" said a person at one of the underwriters with knowledge of the situation.

Facebook's advisory came around May 9, the day it published an amended prospectus that included a cautionary note about lower advertising revenue.

It isn't known which analysts from the 33 IPO underwriters were contacted by Facebook with the revised guidance. It also isn't clear exactly who from Facebook gave the guidance.

As previously reported by Reuters, the analysts for lead underwriter Morgan Stanley and at least three other underwriters in the following days reduced their forecasts for Facebook's second-quarter and full year revenue, and communicated this to at least some of their institutional clients.

Two U.S. financial regulators will review Facebook's initial public offering (IPO) after it closed flat on float and plunged 11 percent on Monday. Facebook shares closed 8.9 percent lower on Tuesday at $31, shedding more than $19 billion in market capitalization from its $38-per-share offering price last week.

Morgan Stanley says it did nothing wrong in the Facebook IPO. Two sources said Morgan Stanley advised Facebook to urge analysts to lower forecasts.

"Morgan Stanley bankers were telling the company how to handle the research analysts," said a source from one of the underwriting firms with knowledge of the situation.

"Facebook changed the numbers--they didn't forecast their business right and they changed their numbers and told analysts," said another source at one of the underwriters with knowledge of the situation.

"The analyst's underwriters then all changed their numbers based on what management was telling them."

Officials at Facebook declined to comment. Morgan Stanley released a statement saying it followed the same procedures with Facebook that it does for all IPOs. "These procedures are in compliance with all applicable regulations," spokesman Pen Pendleton said in the statement.

The bank declined to speak to the question of whether it advised Facebook to give detailed guidance to analysts based on the revised prospectus. Morgan Stanley said it provided the revised prospectus, though not the new earnings forecasts, to all retail and institutional investors.

"In response to the information about business trends, a significant number of research analysts in the syndicate who were participating in investor education reduced their earnings views to reflect their estimate of the impact of the new information. These revised views were taken into account in the pricing of the IPO," the Morgan Stanley statement said.

Federal and state regulators said Tuesday that they were looking into various issues surrounding the Facebook IPO, including whether big investors got key information that was not available to all investors.

For Facebook and Morgan Stanley, news about the revised projections has further undermined confidence in the social media company's shares

(Reporting by Olivia Oran and Nadia Damouni. Editing by Alwyn Scott, Jonathan Weber and Martin Howell and Michael Perry)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
JohnG-73645 wrote:
Who really needs Feces Book?

May 23, 2012 2:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
jakeskatt wrote:
Facebook is worth $10 a share. After all, it did take in less than $3 billion in revenue last year.

May 23, 2012 4:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
LynCe wrote:
Farcebook. Hacks, not hackers.

May 23, 2012 4:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.