Major powers seek Iran concessions at Baghdad talks

BAGHDAD Wed May 23, 2012 4:47am EDT

Related Topics

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - World powers will test Iran's readiness under pressure of sanctions to scale back its nuclear program at talks on Wednesday aimed at easing a decade-old standoff and averting the threat of a Middle East war.

The stakes could scarcely be higher: global oil markets are edgy over toughening sanctions on Iran's vital crude exports and the possibility of Israeli strikes against its defiant arch-foe, which has threatened reprisals if it comes under attack.

Wednesday's meeting between Iran and six world powers - the United States, Russia, China, Germany, France and Britain - will be the second since diplomacy resumed in mid-April in Istanbul after a 15-month hiatus during which tensions soared.

Around 15,000 Iraqi police and troops will protect the venue inside Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone, which has been the target of attacks. Tehran's suggestion of a meeting in troubled Iraq, whose leadership is friendly to Iran, was seen by some diplomats as testing Western commitment to seeking a deal. Formal talks are expected to start around noon (5.00 a.m. EDT).

"Istanbul was important because for us it was a test of the Iranians' willingness to engage. Baghdad should focus on concrete substance," a European diplomat said. "The ball is in their court. It is they who must make the first step."

One senior Western official said the six, led by EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, would make Iran "a detailed proposal that will include confidence-building measures". Ashton arrived in Baghdad on Wednesday morning after last-minute talks with her negotiating partners in Jordan.

Among the proposed measures will be an updated version of an idea first put forth in 2009 that envisaged Iran shipping out its stockpile of low-grade uranium in return for higher-enriched fuel for a medical research reactor in Tehran, another diplomat said.

The main goal of the six powers - known as the P5+1 for the five permanent U.N. Security Council members plus Germany - is expected to be an Iranian agreement to shut down the higher-grade uranium enrichment that it launched in 2010 and has since expanded in an underground plant at Fordow that, to Israeli alarm, would be largely impervious to attack from the air.

Producing such highly enriched material in such quantities has shortened the time Iran might need to build an atomic bomb.

Iran says its nuclear program is a peaceful bid to generate electricity and has repeatedly ruled out suspending its enrichment of uranium, an activity which can have both civilian and military purposes.

But it has indicated possible flexibility on the higher-grade enrichment of uranium to a fissile concentration of 20 percent, the part of Iran's work that most worries the West.


In a possible sign of a new Iranian willingness to address concerns about its atomic ambitions, the U.N. nuclear supervisor said on Tuesday he expected to sign a deal soon to unblock an investigation into suspected work on atom bombs.

But Western diplomats will be wary of past failures to carry out extra inspection deals between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran, and their patience is wearing thin.

They want Iran to cease work at the Fordow site and export its stockpile of higher-grade uranium - demands that analysts say Tehran would be unlikely to accept while sanctions remain.

"The key issue is the 20-percent enrichment potential. This has to be addressed in order to have a productive outcome," said one Western diplomat. "The marching orders for Baghdad are to have concrete ideas on the table, maybe not necessarily agree on all details of these ideas, but to have a clear commitment."

Iran maintains that it needs uranium refined to a fissile concentration of 20 percent for its medical isotope reactor. Enrichment to 5 percent of fissile purity is suitable for power plant fuel, while 90 percent constitutes fuel for bombs. The technical leap from 20 to 90 percent is easier than that to reach 20-percent purity from the lower levels around 5 percent.

"The meeting may not produce any miracles," Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshiyar Zebari told Reuters. "The Iranians are coming with a positive attitude. This is what we are hearing from both sides. They are coming to move, not just to talk."

But Iranian officials kept up a defiant tone.

"The wall of distrust between Iran and the West is high and our public opinion has serious doubts about their compliance with their obligations. The negotiations ... are a good litmus test to prove the West's goodwill," Iranian Press TV quoted Kazem Jalili, spokesman for parliament's national security and foreign policy committee, on Wednesday.


Iran has suggested it will try to leverage its reported rapprochement with the IAEA into a deal in Baghdad to relax sanctions inflicting increasing damage on its economy, including a European Union oil embargo due to take effect in July.

But Western officials ruled out such a weighty concession so soon, even though their call for a "step-by-step" negotiating process is widely seen as a tacit admission that sanctions will have to be eased at some point.

"Sanctions are only going to be lifted if we have significant and genuine progress," one diplomat said.

Emanuele Ottolenghi of the Washington think-tank Foundation for the Defense of Democracies said some concessions from the West would be crucial. "Maybe the U.S. and the EU should agree to suspend measures of minor nature," he said.

"They don't want these negotiations to fail."

Israel, widely assumed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal, has made clear its skepticism about the chances for diplomacy to rein in its arch-enemy.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Israel was concerned that the world powers would not press hard enough to put a full stop its nuclear program and that Israel would keep all options open to achieve that goal.

"This is the time for the entire world to join hands and stop them," Barak told Israel Radio. "We know the Iranians are talented chess players and will try to achieve a nuclear option. Our position hasn't changed. The world has to stop the Iranian nuclear program. All options remain on the table."

Clara O'Donnell, at Washington's Brookings Institution, said: "The likelihood of an Israeli military strike will remain lower while the talks are ongoing. But they are likely to keep talking about it, to keep up the pressure."

(Additional reporting by Sebastian Moffett in Brussels, Fredrik Dahl in Vienna, William Maclean and Andrew Quinn in Baghdad, Adrian Croft and Mark Heinrich in London and Allyn Fisher-Ilan in Jerusalem; Editing by Alastair Macdonald and Philippa Fletcher)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Dhirajkunar wrote:
We the people from India hail Iran, standing up to the west and resisting pressure. India also faced sanctions for more than two decades after its first nuclear test in 1974 and more severe sanctions in 1998 after its second second set of nuclear tests. Iran, like India is a 5000 year NATION, unlike Uncle sam, who is still an experiment of only 236 years. Iran has seen many Jonnies, Annies, and Joke rs of the world rise up and fall by the wayside during its history. Rest be assured, even if the current regime goes out of power, the next one will be even more pressure resistant and will be even more effective in breaking the unity in the “international community”, as France’s quitting from Afghanistan in this year, as opposed to planned exit in 2014. On 23rd May 2012 evening, Ahmedinajad just has to say these words “The talks have absolutely failed. We have walked off from a situation where we were made to sign papers with a gun at our head. We are heading for a confrontation. For a start, we are notifying all shipowners not to use Hormuz starting 1st August 2012. Else face consequences.” The ensuing 200 dollar crude price and 5.5 $ petrol price will surely cause lot of the “international community” guys visit the rest rooms more than they did any time in their lives. Its time the world gives up obsession on Iran and dreams of getting hold over its oil. Israel / nuclear issue is just an excuse. Iran oil for free is the goal.

We are sure Iran with the help of India will torpedo all sanctions and help regime changes in the western world. Beat the west in their own game. And Iran need not be least concerned with Israel, a fruitfly, not a mosquito as Ahmedinajad claims.

May 23, 2012 4:54am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.