Microsoft wins ruling against Motorola over texting

FRANKFURT Thu May 24, 2012 1:58pm EDT

A worker prepares the logo on the Microsoft stand at the CeBIT computer fair in Hanover February 27, 2011. REUTERS/Tobias Schwarz

A worker prepares the logo on the Microsoft stand at the CeBIT computer fair in Hanover February 27, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Tobias Schwarz

Related Topics

FRANKFURT (Reuters) - A German regional court ruled in a hearing on Thursday that Motorola Mobility infringed Microsoft patents by offering the option on its mobile phones to send a longer text in a batch of several messages.

"We're pleased the court agreed today that Motorola has infringed Microsoft's intellectual property, and we hope Motorola will be willing to join other Android device makers by taking a license to our patents," Microsoft said in a statement, referring to Google's Android operating system for mobile phones.

Motorola, which was recently bought by Google, said: "We expect a written decision from the court on June 1 and upon review, will explore all options including appeal."

The two companies are fighting each other in courts across the globe, as are several other makers of devices including Apple, over the intellectual property of software features offered in the latest smart phones and gadgets.

In another case, the same regional court in the city of Munich on Thursday rejected a complaint by Microsoft against Motorola Mobility's use of a software feature called program localization.

Motorola Mobility, in turn, is currently suing Microsoft in the U.S. over features in the Xbox gaming console.

(Reporting by Harro ten Wolde and Jens Hack; Writing by Ludwig Burger; Editing by Will Waterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
DCX2 wrote:
I’m not quite sure, but wouldn’t “breaking apart a large message into smaller messages” be…obvious? Shouldn’t that fail the non-obvious test for issuing patents?

May 24, 2012 5:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
sephamorr wrote:
Wait, you’re kidding me right? That is part of the SMS standard…

May 24, 2012 5:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.