Activist Chen urges China to prosecute those who harassed him

NEW YORK Thu May 24, 2012 5:50pm EDT

REFILE - CORRECTING IDENTITY OF WOMAN Chen Guangcheng, the blind Chinese dissident and legal advocate who recently sought asylum in the United States and is being housed by New York University, takes a break in a city park with an unidentified woman in New York May 22, 2012. REUTERS/Andrew Burton

REFILE - CORRECTING IDENTITY OF WOMAN Chen Guangcheng, the blind Chinese dissident and legal advocate who recently sought asylum in the United States and is being housed by New York University, takes a break in a city park with an unidentified woman in New York May 22, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Burton

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Blind Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng urged authorities in Beijing on Thursday to prosecute "lawless" local officials who harassed and abused the self-taught lawyer, his family and supporters, saying such prosecutions could help China establish the rule of law.

In one of his first interviews since arriving in the United States last Saturday, Chen told Reuters the rough treatment of his family and supporters who helped him escape house arrest last month was "entirely against Chinese law."

"If authorities can promptly investigate and prosecute those lawless officials who broke China's laws, then possibly China can rather quickly move onto the road of rule of law," said Chen, one of China's most prominent dissidents.

"But if local officials continue to act wildly as they wish, perhaps in the near future my family's situation will not be good, and I think that construction of the rule of law (that) the central government has undertaken in the last few decades will be thoroughly ruined," he said.

After his escape, Chen sought refuge at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing for six days, embarrassing China and creating an awkward backdrop for U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's visit to improve ties between the world's two biggest economies.

Chen is going to study as a fellow at New York University School of Law under a deal reached between the United States and China to resolve his situation.

He arrived in New York with his wife and two children on Saturday after China let him leave a Beijing hospital to quell a diplomatic rift with the United States. His right foot remains in a cast after he was injured fleeing the eastern China home in which he had been detained since 2010.

Dressed in a white shirt, gray tie and khaki pants and with his wife looking on, Chen's lip quivered and while he at times looked uneasy during his interview with Reuters in Midtown Manhattan, he also laughed and showed he had a sense of humor.

He said he had felt ill after a car ride from New York University in the Manhattan's Greenwich Village. He conducted the interview with Reuters in Mandarin Chinese.

Chen expressed concern for his family and supporters, particularly his brother and his nephew, Chen Kegui, who has been charged with "intentional homicide" and accused of using knives to fend off local officials who burst into his home the day after they discovered his uncle had escaped house arrest.

Chen's eldest brother, Chen Guangfu, also managed to flee his village on Tuesday, evading a security clampdown to seek help from lawyers for his son Chen Kegui whose case has become a rallying point among rights activists.

"My older brother escapes house arrest and comes to Beijing in search of a lawyer for my nephew," Chen said in the interview.

"This is an extremely normal thing, and the most basic right of a Chinese citizen. If even this right cannot be ensured then I think development in the construction of China's legal system over the past few decades has already been undone by law-breaking officials within the political system," he said.

Chen was jailed for a little more than four years starting in 2006 on what he and his supporters say were trumped-up charges designed to end his advocacy. He was released in 2010 but remained under house arrest and officials turned his home into a fortress of walls, cameras and plainclothes guards.

Chen had accused Shandong province officials in 2005 of forcing women to have late-term abortions and sterilizations to comply with China's strict family planning policies. Authorities moved against him with charges of whipping up a crowd that disrupted traffic and damaged property.

'OBVIOUSLY A VIOLATION'

Chen described the harassment and abuse of his family and supporters as "obviously a violation of China's constitution, and is despicable."

"The Chinese Foreign Ministry has said more than once that I am a free person. Did I do anything wrong by leaving my home? If other people helped me leave ... this is something that should be praised. Why then when I leave do they break into my home to beat people, detain them," he said.

Michael Posner, assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor, said on Thursday the United States is closely monitoring what was happening with Chen's family in China.

"We have ... raised these cases and our concerns with the Chinese government both publicly and privately. ... We'll continue to have contact with Mr. Chen and get his input," Posner said at the launch of the State Department's annual human rights report, which cites Chen under the "arbitrary arrest" section.

The report said that "a number of Chinese activists, friends and supporters, and foreign and domestic journalists who attempted to visit Chen reported being assaulted, detained, forcibly removed, or otherwise abused and prevented from freely accessing his village or seeing him."

Chen said he felt optimistic and confident about his future. He spent the first few days in New York preparing for his studies at New York University, shopping for some necessities and getting himself a mobile phone.

"Now I am learning English," he said. "Perhaps my course and research will start before too long. I will decide on my time here accordingly, now there is still no clear time. I have been here for such a short time - do you want me leave already?" said Chen, laughing.

"I am not in exile. This is a very fundamental premise," said Chen, who has repeatedly said he hopes to eventually return to his homeland.

"No matter what happens, I feel very good about the future. There is no way to compare this with my life before," Chen said. "Before I had faith that everything would get better, and the present has proved this was right."

(Additional reporting by Paul Eckert in Washington; Writing by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
bill1942 wrote:
We suddenly seem to have a much larger contingent of “activists” running around. I don’t know what that job is, but do you think that it pays very well?

May 24, 2012 3:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Wanxialiao wrote:
Chen is fooled to imagine the US as a human rights defender. The US and the West are the real human rights violators to the Chinese as testified by my case in US/Canada. Their human rights propaganda against China only serves a political purpose. I was criminalized only for challenging a professor’s White supremacy theory and complaining about his reprisal fraud, while the US government refuses to investigate crimes against me, and even threatens me with death and disappearance. – Wanxia Liao

My alleged crime was death threat to the professor as I said “If they are going to kill me, I’m going to kill them too” when answering a human rights commission’s questioning on phone. Although I never spoke of anyone’s name, a judge convicted me on a “guessing”that I “meant” the professor. And the Commission made this alleged crime happen by compelling me to testify at a human rights Commission then charging me for my testimony, in violation of Constitutional right against self-incrimination.

I sued US government. The court applied case laws that legalize selective law enforcement by law enforcement agencies on basis of their choice, ruled that I have no right to ask them for equal protection of law. So the White professor Cahill is free of any criminal liability for his crime against me as the US government refuses to investigate him, and then the US government is free from any liability to protect him, even by committing more crimes to me like threats of death and disappearance.

The right to free speech is also selectively enforceable in US on political basis. My Internet free speech is censored by the US government, including Department of State, and by all the major private media. When I sued, the court ruled that the private media are not “government actors” so not liable for violating my free speech rights, as for the real “government actors” like the Department of State, the court ruled they are “immune” from lawsuits. NO free speech to challenge racism in US. Search my name: Wanxia Liao

May 24, 2012 3:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
USAPragmatist wrote:
I am still waiting for ONE Obama hater/rightie to post an apology for their premature judgement/criticism of Obama/Secretary Clinton when this whole thing was going down a month ago…

Still Waiting…

Waiting some more, what are chances ONE rightie will say they where wrong?

May 24, 2012 4:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.