Teacher unions fight to keep clout with Democrats

Fri May 25, 2012 3:17pm EDT

May 25(Reuters) - The email did not mince words. It came from an officer at a California teachers union, and he was irate.

President Barack Obama's re-election team had just hired as a spokeswoman a veteran Democratic operative who had spent the last year at a nonprofit, pushing education policies that the union did not like.

The union had endorsed Obama. But Jeffrey Freitas, secretary of the California Federation of Teachers, wanted to make clear this woman's hiring threatened that alliance. If Obama's team thought teachers would help the campaign after this hire, "then they are seriously wrong," he wrote. As long as she was in her post, he wrote, "we may not be able to participate."

The threat, which the Obama campaign would not discuss, laid bare a simmering tension within the Democratic Party.

While teachers unions have long been among the Democratic Party's most generous donors and the source of its most reliable foot soldiers, their clout in some circles is waning.


Wealthy Democrats, including Los Angeles home developer Eli Broad and New York investment fund managers Whitney Tilson and John Petry, have found common cause with Republicans in a push to apply principles of the corporate world, including free-market competition, to public education. With teachers unions bitterly opposed to such measures, Democrats in the movement say they must break their party's ties to the unions if they're ever to make progress.

So they are offering an alternative to the union dollars, spending freely to back fellow Democrats willing to buck the unions and advance their agenda.

"Education reform is really a fight for the heart and soul of the Democratic Party," said Derrell Bradford, who runs a political group in New Jersey that recently helped elect two union-defying Democrats to the state legislature.

The reform movement's goals include shutting down low-performing public schools; weakening or eliminating teacher tenure; and expanding charter schools, which are publicly funded but often run by private-sector managers, some of them for-profit companies.

Wealthy Democrats have joined Republicans in pouring millions into political campaigns, lobbying and community organizing to try to advance these goals nationwide. They can count on their side several influential Democratic mayors, including Newark's Cory Booker and Chicago's Rahm Emanuel.


Yet the unions haven't rolled over - far from it.

Blasting their opponents as Wall Street billionaires who know nothing about the hard work of educating kids, they have fought back, hard. Their influence with the Democratic Party comes not just from their money but from their manpower; come summer of each election year the unions mobilize armies of teachers to call voters, stuff envelopes and knock on doors.

In 2008 the California Federation of Teachers - the smaller of the two state unions, with 75,000 members - even reached across state lines to mobilize Democrats in swing states such as Nevada, said Joshua Pechthalt, the union president. He said the email protesting the Obama campaign's choice of spokeswoman was intended to remind the party that unions' support is valuable - and to warn it not to take them for granted.

"We were trying to raise the point that, hey, we want to be involved, but put someone else [in that post] who is not going to raise a red flag for our members," Pechthalt said.

The Obama spokeswoman, Linda Serrato, declined to comment, but she remains on the job, and the campaign has indicated it's sticking with her.

Meanwhile, the union's attempt to oust her was reported by a Los Angeles Times columnist this week, sparking outrage among the emerging faction of Democrats who see teachers unions as obstructionist bullies rather than essential allies.

"They seem to be demanding a bizarre loyalty oath of every member of the president's re-election campaign: Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of an education reform group?" said Ben Austin, an education activist and Democratic operative in Los Angeles.


Austin's group, Parent Revolution, is the nonprofit that employed Serrato before she joined the Obama campaign in April. Backed by philanthropists, the organization pushes "parent trigger" laws that let parents seize control of low-performing public schools and oust the teachers or bring in a private management company. Unions have fiercely opposed such laws.

The Obama administration backs parent trigger. The president has also crossed teachers unions with other policies and public statements, such as his support for the mass firing of faculty at a struggling high school in Rhode Island in 2010.

Still, union leaders say they would rather have Obama in office than Republican Mitt Romney, who this week attacked teachers unions as "the clearest example of a group that has lost its way."

The National Education Association, which has 3 million members, has signed up 10,000 volunteers to work for Obama's re-election, said NEA President Dennis Van Roekel.

"The enthusiasm is there," he said. But so, too, is a deep wariness about the motives - and the sheer financial might - of the groups seeking to peel Democrats away from their union allegiances. "We don't have those resources," Van Roekel said.


The tug-of-war between the Democratic Party's two education camps is playing out now in a heated primary race in the 46th State Assembly District, a sprawl of suburbs outside Los Angeles.

From a field of five Democrats, teachers unions have backed Andrew Lachman, an adjunct professor of business law at Woodbury University. The California Teachers Association gave him $7,800 directly, campaign records show - and spent more than $130,000 on ads tearing down one of his opponents, Brian Johnson.

Johnson, who until recently ran a network of charter schools in Los Angeles, has the full support of the charter industry and the education reform community.

Contributions from investors, philanthropists and Silicon Valley executives, including Netflix Chief Executive Officer Reed Hastings and Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Apple founder Steve Jobs, have flooded into Johnson's campaign. Independent groups funded by an overlapping network of donors have blanketed the district with mailers backing him.

Just this week, StudentsFirst, an advocacy group founded by former Washington, D.C., schools chief Michelle Rhee, a Democrat, shifted $2 million into a California political action committee - and promptly spent more than $400,000 of it on ads and polls in support of Johnson, state records show.

Johnson also won the endorsement of Democrats for Education Reform, a national group that steers donations to candidates willing to buck teachers unions.

That drew the ire of the California Democratic Party.

The party's vice chair, Eric Bauman, fired off a cease-and-desist letter demanding that Democrats for Education Reform stop using the word "Democrats" in its name. He accused the group of deceiving voters into thinking its endorsement was an official Democratic Party endorsement. The party has not backed anyone in the race.

Bauman said he was not beholden to the teachers unions and was not acting at their request, though the president of the California Federation of Teachers did applaud his move.

The cease-and-desist letter outraged former state Senator Gloria Romero, who heads the California arm of Democrats for Education Reform. "To me, this is political collusion," she said, accusing her party of kowtowing to the union. "This shows the depths special interests will go to in order to prevent any Democrat from speaking out for education reform."

Then she funneled her anger into a fundraising letter.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
AwareParent wrote:
Good article. However, the writer needs to be aware that “Teachers Unions vs. Wealthy Conservative Democrats” is an increasingly hoary narrative. Only a few months ago, it would have held much more relevance and credibility.

But since then, that fixed dichotomy has broken down. New players have entered this game and they are beginning to understand our stake in its outcome: They’re called parents. And I’m one of them.

Until my son, who is now a second grader, entered the public schools, I hadn’t really focused on education and the profound—and very negative—changes imposed by first, the deceptively titled “No Child Left Behind” and then, the equally bad and, “Race To The Top”.

NCLB has made our schools significantly worse by turning them into “Teach To The Test” factories, where essential, critical educational content—and learning itself—have indeed been “left behind”, intentionally or otherwise.

NCLB also produced massive growth in “Educational Testing and Consulting” companies. More and more of our precious tax dollars have been handed over to private, for-profit companies—money that would have been used for teachers, facilities and much more in the past.

But, the worst effect of NCLB has been the “opening” it has provided to a vast number of “Astroturf” groups, usually funded in whole or part by three billionaire’s foundations: Broad, Gates and Walton. These ersatz groups describe their work as “Education Reform”. Sounds nice, doesn’t it? Almost progressive. Most people love the word, “education”, and the word “reform”; put them together and they’re almost irresistible. Yes. Exactly. That was the entire point.

These three “Leading Men” are joined by a large “Supporting Cast”, which includes a number of hedge fund operators, tech millionaires and “libertarian” charlatans.

These three groups alone control billions—literally billions—to purchase the public conversation; to buy the public dialogue; to dominate and overwhelm any other voices. It’s not “democracy”—where the best ideas have equal exposure and a fully informed public can understand them without extraordinary effort—but more like and Elite Information Monopoly that can literally pay for a louder microphone that can shape public perceptions to their liking.

It took some time for me, and other parents in our school, and throughout our community, to understand the storm that was gathering and the existential threat it represented to our public schools. But now, we’re catching on. And we’re fighting back—with absolutely everything we have.

We’re joining “Parents Across America”—one of the few genuine grassroots organizations fighting on behalf of our kids, their teachers and public education generally. We’re reading Diane Ravitch, the “real” US Secretary of Education, and finding out what changed her from a Bush Administration conservative who helped design and drive the “Testing-Charters-Vouchers-Privatization” dogma—to a leading voice against it.

We’re talking to each other, learning what’s REALLY happening to our schools, and standing up in support of each other’s children and the diligent, dedicated people who educate them.

So, nothing personal against the writer, but I’m deeply offended by the very inaccurate claim that only teachers and Democratic Party activists are fighting back against the people behind so-called “Education Reform”. Whether by intention, or inadvertently, the fastest growing, and most passionate group of opponents are moms and dads who are now “clued in” and furious to see these attempts to dismantle and privatize our free, universal, education system.

Since its inception, the American system of education has inspired the rest of the world and helped us build the most advanced and innovative economy of the last century. Despite our many problems—both in society, and in our schools—American education continues to set the standard in many world arenas. And that’s an accomplishment we should all acknowledge and build upon, instead of claiming that our schools are “IN CRISIS!!!” and “IN NEED OF RADICAL CHANGE!!!”

They aren’t “in crisis”. And they do not need “radical change”. Despite how many times we’ve had those specious and shrill clichés drilled into our brains.

Parents: It’s time to fight back, coast-to-coast. WE are the Last Line Of Defense in the battle to preserve, protect and defend the schools that educate our children. I’m willing to do whatever it takes. And I’m joined with thousands and thousands who share my views.

Call yourselves “Reformers”. Call yourselves “Democrats”. Assign yourselves any anonym you’d like, actually. Just stay away from our children and stop demonizing their teachers.

Go put your energy—and your vast, unimaginable wealth—into your OWN separate, elitist, private schools. And why not? Isn’t this where YOUR children are actually enrolled? If you want to “reform” something so badly, I suggest you start in your own backyard, perfecting your “academies” and “country day” schools. Last I checked, they had their problems too.

We parents are now involved in this struggle. We’re ready for it. And we’re a living, breathing confirmation of the fact that “you can’t fool all of the people, all of the time.”

You’ll be hearing more from as this fight continues. I guarantee it.
In the meantime, please stop assuming this is “Teachers and Democrats vs. True Reformers”. It’s not. Not even close.

May 30, 2012 5:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.