Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Wisconsin governor recall election debate shows sharp divide

1 of 5. Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who is facing a recall election, talks to Democratic challenger and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett (L) before the start of the debate in Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 25, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Darren Hauck

MILWAUKEE | Sat May 26, 2012 12:25am EDT

MILWAUKEE (Reuters) - Wisconsin's Republican Governor Scott Walker and his challenger Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett drew sharp ideological differences on Friday during the first of two debates before a special election to recall the governor on June 5.

Walker faces a special election after he angered Democrats and labor unions by pushing through the state legislature a law that strips public sector labor unions of much of their power. Walker would become the third governor in United States history to be recalled if he loses.

During the one-hour debate in Milwaukee, Walker touted his efforts to balance the state's budget by curbing the power of public sector labor unions, while Barrett painted the first-term governor as untrustworthy.

"This election is not a rematch or do-over because we can't do over the decisions of Scott Walker to start a political civil war," Barrett said.

The two candidates are familiar foes, with Walker defeating Barrett by five points in the 2010 gubernatorial race. A recent poll conducted by St. Norbert College and Wisconsin Public Radio showed Barrett trailing Walker by a similar margin, 50-45 percent.

The polls continue to show an extremely small number of undecided voters. As a result, both candidates need to motivate their supporters to turn out to vote.

"What Barrett did tonight for himself is he came out very assertive," said Tim Dale, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay.

"Walker also did what he needed to do ... appear strong and almost non-responsive to Barrett," he added.

Walker's changes to organized labor last year forced state and local government workers like teachers to pay a portion of the cost of health insurance and pensions, capped wage increases and required unions to be recertified every year. Walker said the reforms were needed to close a budget gap, while Democrats and unions said they were an effort at "union busting."

Walker said during the debate that the state now has a $154 million surplus and has experienced more than $1 billion in savings due to his reforms.

"We balanced (the) budget without raising taxes, without massive layoffs and cuts in programs," Walker said. "The good news is that our reforms are working and that is why our opponents don't talk about them anymore."

The candidates also debated over Walker's record in creating jobs. The Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that Wisconsin had lost more jobs than any other state between March of 2011 and March of 2012. But earlier this month, Walker aides released the state's Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data, which suggests an increase of 23,321 jobs in the state between December 2010 to December 2011.

"Those numbers have never been verified and he knows they have never been verified," Barrett said. "It's clear what's going on, he can't defend his record on jobs."

Barrett also criticized Walker over an investigation into corruption during the governor's time as Milwaukee County Executive. The probe has resulted in criminal charges against five former aides and close political associates.

Walker blasted Barrett's record as Milwaukee mayor for the last eight years. The city has become one of the poorest in the nation with an unemployment rate of 28 percent, Walker said.

"We don't want Wisconsin to become Milwaukee," Walker said.

The two candidates will square off again for another debate Thursday.

(Editing by Greg McCune and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
JamesChirico wrote:
You have to wonder why people believe the out of state money ads put out there by Walker’s campaign. BLS shows job loss for 2011 not the I say so Walker campaign claim. Walker is ethically challenged, the E-mails not released says he has something to hide. His punked conversation with a faux Koch brother shows he had no problem breaking the law if it would work for him. Fly you to Cali got outstanding instead of it’s against the law for me to take free trips. Cutting over a billion from education is not advancing educational achievement, the opposite. Members only state hunting grounds is not something the public wants for hunters. For all the tax cut gifts to corporations, they have cut jobs. Balanced budget is nonsense too when the Federal government got a certified we’re a distressed state to cut medicare costs by the state. Walker got concessions from the unions then took away their rights. Their right to decide who is in an assembly taken when non dues payers by law can vote for union labor reps. IMO no collective bargaining laws are illegal federally. We have a right to assembly and a right to petition the government. In a congressional hearing it was pointed out union busting measures did not save the state a dime (Kucinich), was only used to bust up people with any say for the working class. The mining bill had environmental concerns not addressed by the GOP. Midnight votes by the state legislature, violations of debate time, shutting out amendments are all changes by the GOP legislature since Walker declared war on his opponents. He does not work with people, he bludgeons them. His 70% from out of state campaign money shows he needs the conservatives outside his state to further take a swipe at his opponents.

May 26, 2012 7:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Jayhay wrote:
It just seems like jacking with the unions’ bargaining power was not necessary to achieve the budget goals.

May 26, 2012 7:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Randy549 wrote:
The story about the Kaukauna, WI school district that was formerly being forced by the teachers’ union to buy health insurance _from the teachers’ union_ (the “WEA Trust”) rather than on the open market (at a price higher than the open market) is illustrative of the kind of savings that the governor’s reforms made possible. By ending these kinds of shenanigans, Kaukauna was able to hire more teachers, reduce class sizes, and still save money overall — because the school district’s money could be applied where it belongs (improving the quality of education) rather than the pad the pockets of the teachers’ union.

http://www.postcrescent.com/article/20110810/APC0101/108100488/Kaukauna-schools-change-insurance-carriers

May 26, 2012 10:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.