Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Anti-tax crusader assails report on Republican shift

Related Topics

Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist addresses the American Conservative Union's annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington February 11, 2012. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist addresses the American Conservative Union's annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington February 11, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Tue May 29, 2012 5:53pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, scourge of any and all tax increases, said on Tuesday that news report questioning the vitality of his "no new taxes" pledge - a vow taken by many Republican politicians - is overblown.

Norquist, a registered lobbyist, heads the anti-tax group Americans for Tax Reform, which has enlisted almost every Republican member of the U.S. Congress to sign a pledge against raising taxes.

The Washington Post ran a story on May 25 reporting that "an increasing number of GOP (Republican) candidates for Congress are declining to sign the promise to oppose any tax increase, a small sign that could signal a big shift in Republican politics on taxes."

Speaking at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, Norquist criticized the article. "We're doing as well this year as in previous years" in terms of recruiting pledge signers, he said. "This idea that there's some shift. That's not accurate."

Republicans who have not signed the pledge may be in congressional races they are unlikely to win anyway, while other candidates have rules against signing pledges, he said.

Norquist's pledge came under scrutiny last year amid deficit-reduction negotiations in Congress. Democrats used the pledge to paint Republicans as intransigent and beholden to Norquist.

Norquist said his group plans to spend about $8 million in the campaign season preceding the November 6 elections, highlighting candidates who have signed the pledge and those who have not.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney has signed the pledge. So did nine of the 10 initial Republican presidential candidates.

Norquist's pledge, which started in 1986, has become Republican dogma for many federal or local party candidates.

Only six Republicans in the House of Representatives have not signed the pledge. Seven Republican Senators have not signed.

(Reporting by Patrick Temple-West; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
AlkalineState wrote:
The pledge. That’s weak. This is like a ‘low-price pledge’ from a used car dealer. I think these GOP congressmen are playing with themselves too much. When you find yourself making a super duper pinky promise to a dude named Grover….. it’s over.

GOP is in free-fall.

May 29, 2012 5:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
I say dont let this guy use anything that the american taxpayers pay for….It’s time for grover to get off our grid.

May 29, 2012 11:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RoaringFish wrote:
It is a pledge to an ideology. When loyalty to an ideology takes precedent over everything else, it has become a faith-based argument, in exactly the same way as Islamists.

Republicans should be more honest and declare themselves as a religion, because that is pretty much what they have become.

May 30, 2012 5:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.