Sponsored Links

Upgrade oil in Canada, opposition leader says

Thu May 31, 2012 5:56pm EDT

* Mulcair calls for more refining rather than pipelines

* Says Harper government not enforcing legislation

* Alberta premier snubs NDP leader

By Jeffrey Jones

CALGARY, Alberta, May 31 (Reuters) - Canada should refine more crude from its vast oil sands to create jobs and boost economic benefits rather than build pipelines to ship the raw material overseas, the leader of federal opposition party said after his first visit to the massive Alberta production facilities on Th urs day.

New Democratic Party leader Thomas Mulcair, who toured Suncor Energy Inc's sprawling oil sands operation, also said he did not advocate imposing new environmental legislation on the energy sector, only demanding the federal government enforce laws that are already on the books.

Mulcair, who hails from Quebec, has come under fire in Alberta for saying the booming oil sands industry is partly responsible for driving up Canadian dollar's value, which in turn has led to a struggling manufacturing sector as goods for exports became too expensive.

Following his high-profile trip to the oil sands hub of Fort McMurray, Alberta, he insisted his left-wing NDP supports measured, long-term economic growth and was not anti-tar sands.

"That means building a diversified economy that includes value-added jobs and a thriving export industry. It means upgrading and refining our own natural resources right there in Canada and particularly in Alberta, instead of building pipelines to ship raw bitumen, for example, overseas," Mulcair said in Edmonton.

"It means making polluters pay for the pollution they create rather than leaving that cleanup to future generations. Governments have an obligation of result."

Following a surprise second-place showing in last year's federal election, Mulcair and his party have made big strides in opinion polls and in some have surpassed Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives, although Canadians do not head to the polls again until October 2015.

Alberta Progressive Conservative Premier Alison Redford was angered by Mulcair's remarks about the oil sands' national economic impact, and attended an economic forum in the United States on Thursday rather than meet with him. Instead, Mulcair had meetings with Deputy Premier Thomas Lukaszuk and Fort McMurray Mayor Melissa Blake.

Interestingly, calls to refine more bitumen from the oil sands within Alberta have come from politicians in the province for years, the last being Redford's predecessor, Ed Stelmach.

However, some analysts warn a big increase in upgrading and refining capacity in Alberta could result in prices for the products slumping after numerous U.S. refineries have added equipment to process heavy Canadian bitumen. Redford has said the market should decide.

Meanwhile, she and the Harper government have promoted pipelines to Texas and Canada's Pacific Coast to diversify markets for Canadian crude, projects that face staunch opposition from environmental groups.

Both governments have said the industry is developing the resource, which is the world's third-largest crude deposit, responsibly under their watchful eye. They have set up new monitoring programs after formal scientific reviews found studies of ecological impact lacking.

Mulcair said the Harper government is to blame for much of the environmental damage, by not enforcing acts pertaining to migratory birds, navigable waters and species at risk.

"It affects animal life, it affects ecosystems and ultimately it affects human life as well, so these are things that we take seriously as obligations of the federal government, and we don't think that Stephen Harper's Conservatives in particular have been living up to those obligations," he said.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
jonnyKanuk wrote:
Canadians need to take control of things and the Federal Government needs to enact legislation to prevent the Exxons, Total’s, Chinese Interests and Shell’s of the world from stealing our jobs and in the meanwhile paying less for our product. Lets talk about a National energy Program that actually protects all Canadians. Generally speaking Pierre had the right idea it only had the fault of hurting the provinces that had the product in the first place. That is when Peter Lougheed told them that they could freeze in the dark. I dont have a problem sharing the oil revenues with the rest of Canada. I just dont like the rest of Canada taking the lions share of our bounty. Way Back When in the early days there was only one place to buy things like houses (Eatons), pianos (Gourlay), furniture Eatons & others) and manufactured goods (Cream Separators, Tractors). That was Ontario and Quebec. Most of the Canadiana antiques you find today are from Ontario and Quebec. We in the west have done our part to support the East now we are asking for a little return of the favour. The trickle down from these plants is good for all the Canadian economy. Mark Carney is not as smart as people think, considering that he has the oil income to help all Canadian finances along. Obama is behind the 8-ball because they have little to sell to the rest of the world. We need to have a finished product that every body wants and is willing to pay for – In Canadian dollars thank you. Remember what the US did to the Softwood Lumber Industry with their Free Trade Agreement. We need to protect Canadians rights to our product and the right to sell as much of it in whatever state of finishing the customer is willing to pay for. We used to call that Free Market.

May 31, 2012 9:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
kipsengland wrote:
I never thought of that you are positively right

Jun 01, 2012 7:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
thedingo8 wrote:
ThOMMasY Mulscairy… shows that everythin g is just blah blah control..while he still uses the anti oilsands term “tarsands”

Jun 01, 2012 2:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.