Lawmakers blast U.N. "power grab" for the Net

WASHINGTON Thu May 31, 2012 3:49pm EDT

An internet cable is seen at a server room in this picture illustration taken in Warsaw. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel

An internet cable is seen at a server room in this picture illustration taken in Warsaw.

Credit: Reuters/Kacper Pempel

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers on Thursday said they are united when it comes to keeping the Internet free from centralized control and preventing the United Nations from gaining power over Web content and infrastructure.

The U.S. government wants to bring as much ammunition as possible to a December meeting in Dubai where delegations from 193 countries will discuss whether to hand governance of the Internet over to the United Nations.

The United States fears December's treaty-writing conference could turn the Internet into a political bargaining chip and could empower efforts by countries like China, Russia and Iran to erode Internet freedoms and isolate their populations.

"We may have our differences on domestic telecommunications policy, but having those policies decided at the international level would be the worst thing that could happen," Representative Marsha Blackburn said at a hearing before a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee.

The Tennessee Republican commended the Obama administration's efforts to thwart giving an international governing body power over the Internet.

Vinton Cerf, regarded as one of the fathers of the Internet and now vice president and chief Internet evangelist at Google Inc, cautioned that a move toward top-down control dictated by governments could hinder Internet innovation and growth.

That path, he said, "promotes exclusion, hidden deals, potential for indiscriminate surveillance and tight centralized management."

A bipartisan group of lawmakers on Wednesday introduced a resolution to reject the proposed international takeover of the Internet and preserve the current "multi-stakeholder" model of governance.

"In many ways, this is a referendum on the future of the Internet," Republican Representative Mary Bono Mack said at Thursday's hearing.

"If this power grab is successful, I'm concerned that the next Arab Spring will instead become a Russia Winter where free speech is chilled, not encouraged, and the Internet becomes a wasteland of unfilled hopes, dreams and opportunities," said Bono Mack, a sponsor of the resolution.

Social media sites Twitter, Facebook and Google's YouTube played a big role in last year's "Arab Spring" revolution.


The Internet is currently policed loosely, with technical bodies such as the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and the World Wide Web Consortium largely dictating its infrastructure and management. The United States holds significant sway with those bodies.

When the delegations gather in Dubai in December, they will renegotiate a U.N. treaty last revisited in 1988, and debate proposals that would consolidate control over the Internet with the United Nations' International Telecommunications Union (ITU).

"During the treaty negotiations, the most lethal threat to Internet freedom may not come from a full-frontal assault but through insidious and seemingly innocuous expansions of inter-governmental powers," said Federal Communications Commissioner Robert McDowell.

Proposals out of the Middle East, McDowell said, would change the definition of telecommunications in a way that arguably would include the Internet, and would suddenly sweep an entire industry into the rubric of ITU rules.

The Republican commissioner blasted claims from ITU leadership that no nations have proposed expanding the ITU's jurisdiction to the Internet.

"An infinite number of avenues exist to accomplish the same goal, and it is camouflaged subterfuge that proponents of Internet freedom should watch for most vigilantly," he said.

The lawmakers fear that countries like China, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and others could politick smaller nations who have little interest in the issue to back them in giving them greater ability to isolate their populations and silence political dissidents.

The United States is concerned that authoritarian regimes will campaign for their initiatives by promising to back proposals from developing countries that would like to see tariffs on content-heavy Internet companies such as Google, Facebook and Netflix.

"Some ITU officials have dismissed our concerns over these issues as mere election year politics, and nothing could be further from the truth," McDowell said. "The threats are real and not imagined."


The United States will step up its meetings with other countries to thwart an expansion of ITU's authority, with about 50 or so bilateral meetings to take place in the lead-up to the December talks.

"We're investing a lot of effort in trying to be in the best possible position to explain why these kinds of things would be a bad idea," Ambassador Philip Verveer, deputy assistant secretary of state, said.

The United States on May 8 formed its core delegation of government officials who will head to Dubai, including members of the State Department, Commerce Department, Department of Homeland Security, Defense Department, FCC and NASA.

President Barack Obama earlier this week told Congress he intended to assign ambassadorial rank to Terry Kramer to lead the delegation, Verveer said.

Kramer was a long-time executive at Vodafone Group Plc. He now teaches at Harvard University and serves as a board member or adviser for numerous telecom companies and nonprofits.

Private-sector members and other representatives will be added in September and those voices are expected to add force to the U.S. government's argument to preserve decentralized control of the Internet.

(Reporting By Jasmin Melvin; Editing by Gary Hill)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
WJL wrote:
What about the American espionage centres monitoring the global internet traffic? Can you trust America?

The internet has to be controlled by the UN to reduce misinformation and propaganda campaigns by America and its allies, spreading hatred and fostering civil unrest in all parts of the world. Look at the current case of Syria where a massive propaganda campaign is underway and tragedies like the murder of children is committed.

Let us have real freedom of the internet. The current protocol is running out and has to be replaced soon. This is a good time to shift control to the UN. Naturally my comments will disappear soon as Reuters quickly publishes a rehashed version of this article and hence effectively curbing free speech.

May 31, 2012 6:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AZWarrior wrote:
We invented the Internet with US taxpayer’s dollars. Ignore the tinpot dictators and religious fascists that use the UN to plunder the freedoms of humanity. In fact, an open and uncensored Internet is critically important in keeping governments from becoming even more tyrannical than they are now, as it is the ultimate guarantee of free speech. So the answer is a big NO from the people of the US, and I suspect from the people of the world at large as well.

May 31, 2012 8:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RoaringFish wrote:
@WJL ~ I completely agree with you. At the moment, the US government effectively controls the internet vie compliant proxies based in the US. ICAN for example. This is why they object to the UN taking on that role.

I don’t trust the US government an inch, but they seem to fool the likes of AZWarrior quite easily…

May 31, 2012 10:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.