Israel "supportive" on future Iran sanctions: U.S.

JERUSALEM Mon Jun 4, 2012 2:32am EDT

Related Topics

Photo

Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - The United States is conferring with Israel about new sanctions planned against Iran should international negotiations this month fail to curb the Islamic Republic's nuclear program, a U.S. official said on Monday.

The comment offered a strong hint that Washington is continuing to apply the brakes on any plan by Israel to attack Iranian nuclear facilities preemptively.

Israel has signaled increasing impatience with the lack of progress towards circumscribing the nuclear program during the negotiations, involving Iran, the United States and five other world powers. The third round of talks will be hosted by Russia on June 18-19.

"If we don't get a breakthrough in Moscow there is no question we will continue to ratchet up the pressure," David Cohen, U.S. Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, told Haaretz newspaper during a visit to Israel.

The United States and European Union have already made clear they will stiffen sanctions should Iran pursue uranium enrichment, a process that can yield fuel for warheads though it insists the objective is civilian energy and medical isotopes.

Cohen stressed the depth of the U.S.-Israeli partnership.

"We have today and over the past years had very close cooperation with the Israeli government across a range of our sanctions programs," he said. "They are creative. They are supportive and we will continue to consult with the Israelis."

Cohen made similar comments to Army Radio, a major Israeli broadcaster, during his 36-hour visit, when he was to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's senior security staff.

In a speech last week, Netanyahu said world powers must both beef up sanctions and demand an immediate end to all uranium enrichment by Iran, whose mid-level 20 percent purification has been the focus of earlier negotiations.

Israel is reputed to have the region's only atomic arsenal and many international experts, including the top U.S. military officer, General Martin Dempsey, have voiced doubt in the ability of its conventional forces to deliver lasting damage to Iran's distant, dispersed and well-defended nuclear facilities.

The Israelis have hinted that delaying Iran's progress could justify a unilateral strike. Ensuing Iranian reprisals would risk drawing in the United States, which has not ruled out force against Tehran but is loath to launch a new military campaign in the Muslim world.

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by John Stonestreet)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Life1 wrote:
Who needs enemies with friends like these…

Jun 04, 2012 3:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
McBob08 wrote:
Israel, which has many times in the past attacked sovereign nations without any provocation within the past 50 years, dares to suggest that another nation that has invaded absolutely no one in over 100 years can’t have a civilian nuclear program? The complete and utter gall! Before Israel starts talking nonsense like that, they should be allowing the IAEA to inspect THEIR nation and expose their own hidden nuclear weapons program!.

The sanctions are placed on the wrong nation; Israel is the nation that truly poses a threat to the Middle East and the rest of the world, not Iran. Take the sanctions off of Iran; let them develop their nuclear program — their fissionable material isn’t anywhere near concentrated enough to make weapons (you need 90%, they’re spinning 0.3%), plus, Uranium makes horrible nuclear weapons; what the rest of the world has is Plutonium warheads, and Iran has done absolutely nothing with Plutonium.

Anyone who takes 10 minutes and critically examines the situation can easily see that these militant threats being levelled at Iran have absolutely nothing to do with their nuclear program. Iran is just a good target for invasion, keeping the steady flow of American Taxdollars into the pockets of greedy War Profiteers. In the end, it isn’t about safety; it isn’t even about oil. It just simply about horrible men getting rich off the suffering and death of other people.

Jun 04, 2012 5:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.