Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S.: Israel "supportive" on future Iran sanctions

Related Topics

JERUSALEM | Mon Jun 4, 2012 12:07pm EDT

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - The United States is conferring with Israel about new sanctions planned against Iran should international negotiations this month fail to curb the Islamic Republic's nuclear program, a U.S. official said on Monday.

The comment offered a strong hint that Washington is continuing to apply the brakes on any plan by Israel to attack Iranian nuclear facilities preemptively.

Israel has signaled increasing impatience with the lack of progress towards circumscribing the nuclear program during the negotiations involving Iran, the United States and five other world powers. The third round of talks will be hosted by Russia on June 18-19.

"If we don't get a breakthrough in Moscow there is no question we will continue to ratchet up the pressure," David Cohen, U.S. Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, told Haaretz newspaper during a visit to Israel.

The United States and European Union have already made clear they will stiffen sanctions should Iran pursue uranium enrichment, a process that can yield fuel for warheads though it insists the objective is civilian energy and medical isotopes.

An Israeli official who met Cohen told Reuters that the message on sanctions was welcomed.

"These are things we have heard before, but when you hear it from the top guy on sanctions, it's encouraging," said the official, who declined to be identified.

Cohen stressed in the interview with Haaretz the depth of the U.S.-Israeli partnership.

"We have today and over the past years had very close cooperation with the Israeli government across a range of our sanctions programs," he said. "They are creative. They are supportive and we will continue to consult with the Israelis."

Echoing those remarks, the Israeli official described the discussions as "daily ping-pong".

Cohen made similar comments to Army Radio, a major Israeli broadcaster, during his 36-hour visit, when he was to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's senior security staff.

In a speech last week, Netanyahu said world powers must both beef up sanctions and demand an immediate end to all uranium enrichment by Iran, whose mid-level 20 percent purification has been the focus of earlier negotiations.

Israel is reputed to have the region's only atomic arsenal and many international experts, including the top U.S. military officer, General Martin Dempsey, have voiced doubt in the ability of its conventional forces to deliver lasting damage to Iran's distant, dispersed and well-defended nuclear facilities.

The Israelis have hinted that delaying Iran's progress could justify a unilateral strike. Ensuing Iranian reprisals would risk drawing in the United States, which has not ruled out force against Tehran but is loath to launch a new military campaign in the Muslim world.

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Michael Roddy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
Dhirajkunar wrote:
We the people from India hail Iran, standing up to the west and resisting pressure. India also faced sanctions for more than two decades after its first nuclear test in 1974 and more severe sanctions in 1998 after its second second set of nuclear tests. Iran, like India is a 5000 year NATION, unlike Uncle sam, who is still an experiment of only 236 years. Iran has seen many Jonnies, Annies, and Jo ke rs of the world rise up and fall by the wayside during its history. Rest be assured, even if the current regime goes out of power, the next one will be even more pressure resistant and will be even more effective in breaking the unity in the “international community”, as exemplified by France’s quitting from Afghanistan in this year, as opposed to planned exit in 2014. On 19th June 2012 evening, Ahmedinajad just has to say these words “The talks have absolutely failed. We have walked off from a situation where we were made to sign papers with a gun at our head. We are clearly heading for a confrontation. For a start, we are notifying all shipowners not to use Hormuz starting 1st August 2012. Else face consequences.” The ensuing 200 dollar crude price and 7 $ petrol price will surely cause lot of the “international community” con masters visit the rest rooms more than they did any time in their lives. Its time the US gives up obsession on Iran and dreams of getting hold over its oil. Israel / nuclear issue is just an excuse. IRAN OIL FOR FREE is the goal.

We are sure Iran with the help of India, will torpedo all sanctions and facilitate regime changes in the western world and beat the west in their own game. And Iran need not be least concerned with the worlds biggest bluffmaster Israel, a fruitfly, not a mosquito as Ahmedinajad claims. There will be absolutely no attack from Israel or any other land, much as the armchair journalists / armchair strategists / spin doctors / bogeymen / fraudsters may want to fool the world by creating or soaping up a doomsday scenario of Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb.

Jun 04, 2012 1:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ReutersAgenda wrote:
I’m not even going to bother with seeing how many people responded “DUH”!

Jun 04, 2012 4:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
usagadfly wrote:
How about using sanctions to require either an all-party settlement of issues in Palestine, or a single state, one man one vote democracy that treats all native ethnicities the same?? If it is good enough for the USA it should be good enough for Israel / Palestine.

As long as Israel has a “blank check” from the USA it will behave badly. History has shown this. Not that their neighbors are much better. But why harm Americans to enable religious discrimination in a foreign country? Time to end the silliness. Spend US tax money to help Americans, all Americans, not just Jews and Arabs.

Jun 04, 2012 5:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.