Sponsored Links

U.S. Senate Republicans block equal pay measure

WASHINGTON, June 5 | Tue Jun 5, 2012 4:34pm EDT

WASHINGTON, June 5 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked an election-year bid by Democrats for legislation they said would discourage employers from paying women less than they pay men for the same job.

In a party-line vote, Democrats, who control the Senate, failed to muster the 60 votes needed to advance the legislation backed by President Barack Obama.

The issue is part of an election-year effort by Obama and congressional Democrats to woo women voters ahead of Nov. 6 elections.

Public opinion polls show Obama has more backing among women than Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. With some recent surveys showing Romney improving his support among women, Democrats have aggressively sought to maintain their advantage by advertising what they call a Republican "war on women."

The party-line vote on the Paycheck Fairness Act will help Democrats deliver that message in campaign speeches and advertising.

Critics said the law would spur a rash of lawsuits against employers at a time when the U.S. economy is struggling to create jobs. But backers point to data showing that women on average are paid 77 cents for every dollar earned by men doing the same job.

"When women get a mortgage, we don't get a 23 percent discount," said Democratic Senator Barbara Mikulski, the bill's chief sponsor. "When we go to buy food, we don't get a 23 percent discount. When we go to pay our utility bills, they don't say you're paid less; we're going to give you a discount. No. We get charged the same and often more for what we do, but we're paid less."

The bill aims to close the pay gap between men and women by requiring employers to show that any pay disparities are based on work-related factors such as education, training and experience. It also would update current fair pay laws by barring employers from punishing workers who share information about their pay.

Democrats say the law builds on a 2009 law signed by Obama that made it easier for women to sue for pay discrimination.

That measure is known as the "Lilly Ledbetter Law" after a Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. worker who had lost her claim of pay discrimination before the U.S. Supreme Court because she waited too long to sue. Le dbetter was in the Senate on Tuesday as this latest pay equity measure faltered.

Republican critics said the legislation, which would allow women to pursue punitive damages in wage discrimination cases, would encourage too many frivolous court cases.

"Unfortunately, the only winners under this legislation would be trial lawyers, giving them a windfall," said Republican Senator Dean Heller. "This legislation opens the door to frivolous lawsuits which already cost our economy billions of dollars every year."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Voter06410 wrote:
This is so infuriating. Not just the Senate but the REPORTING OF FALSE INFORMATION by the press!! They do NOT need 60 votes to advance legislation. They had enough votes to advance, with 52-48. You try to make it sound like the vote went against by 52. It was 52 FOR the bill. The only reason they chickened out was because they were afraid of a filibuster, and 60 votes would’ve over-ridden a filibuster. But here’s the infuriating part: the Republicans did NOT even have to filibuster or do anything at all. They just sit back and threaten to filibuster, knowing they won’t actually have to do it. LET THEM DO IT, DEMS! Let any one of those useless jerks stand up and filibuster all day against equal pay for women. I’d LOVE to see them do it, and so would half the workers in America. This congress makes me sick.

Jun 05, 2012 4:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
lucky12345 wrote:
Women need to take responsibility for their actions and determine how much they make in relationship to other employees and either ask for that salary or find a new job. It’s not that difficult! The last thing this country needs is yet another law that require hours to prepare in order to prove you are in compliance… We all need to take a hard look at something called “personnel responsibility”
This was purely a political maneuver by Obama in order to continue his “war on women” campaign – divide and win reelection…

Jun 05, 2012 5:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hammer62 wrote:
The Republicans in the U.S. Senate have really shone their colors today. Sexism is alive and well in the halls of our government. In the upcoming Nov. Election, why or how could a woman vote Republican if she has a family to support? Logically it would make no sense to impose a 23% pay cut on herself. It’s not Obama hurting women in this issue, but the do nothing until forced Republican Delegation in the U.S. Congress.

Jun 05, 2012 5:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.