Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Democrat Barrett concedes Wisconsin recall election defeat

1 of 2. Gubernatorial candidate and Milwaukee's Democratic Mayor Tom Barrett concedes the race at his election night rally in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June 5, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/John Gress

MILWAUKEE | Tue Jun 5, 2012 11:47pm EDT

MILWAUKEE (Reuters) - Democratic challenger Tom Barrett conceded Wisconsin's recall election to Republican Governor Scott Walker on Tuesday, saying he hoped the deeply divided state would now come together.

With 85 percent of the vote counted, Walker had about 55 percent of the ballots to 44 percent for Milwaukee Mayor Barrett.

"This has been the most amazing experience of our lives," Barrett told supporters. "What we have seen during the last sixteen months is this democracy come alive."

Barrett lost to Walker in the 2010 governor's election as well but will continue as mayor of Wisconsin's largest city, Milwaukee.

Walker is only the third governor in U.S. history to face a recall during his term in office. He angered Democrats and unions when he championed a law to severely restrict the collective bargaining of unionized state and local government workers. Walker said the changes were necessary to close a large state budget deficit.

The recall election has been seen as a barometer of the U.S. political climate going into the presidential election in November.

The vote was also viewed as a test of strength between organized labor and conservative opponents, both of whom have poured money and effort into the contest.

The election has broken all state records, with more than $60 million spent, including millions from so-called Super PACs which are third parties not directly tied to the candidates who have blanketed the airwaves in Wisconsin with advertising.

(Reporting by Brendan O'Brien; Writing by Andrew Stern; Editing by Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
ameriman2 wrote:
Union greed and Democrat corruption/collusion lost..Taxpayers won.

The general public realizes the corruption of a union giving a Democrat $millions to get elected and then negotiating with the same Democrat for Union salary and benefit demands. It is not ok for taxpayer hard earned dollars to be stolen by Democrats this way.

There is no reason other than greed that union dues should have been mandatory.
This was all about power, corruption and abuse of power by unions and Democrats.

Jun 05, 2012 12:11am EDT  --  Report as abuse
mjp1958 wrote:
No, the REAL winners were the billionaire Koch Brothers, who spent tens of millions of dollars, more than any one else, to support Walker through advertising and other tactics. The voters and American Democracy were the losers.

Jun 06, 2012 12:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:
I think the spin is a little rediculous on this one. This is the way I see this one (I had never seen a picture of Barrett before). Walker is a young thin active person and Barret is old soft and slow. America is just that superficial. Why do you think Romney is the republican candidate. He has that very nice college republican look. A real Niedermeyer. The famous frat boy. We love them silver spooners.

Jun 06, 2012 1:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.