Sponsored Links

S&P says U.S. to avoid "fiscal cliff," risks remain

NEW YORK | Sat Jun 9, 2012 2:19am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Standard & Poor's said on Friday it expects U.S. lawmakers to set aside their differences to prevent a combination of tax hikes and spending cuts from hurting the economy in early 2013.

The rating agency affirmed the AA-plus rating of the world's biggest economy but cautioned that its outlook remains negative.

The affirmation of the rating restarts the six- to 24-month period in which the agency could again cut the U.S. rating.

"One thing we do expect Republicans and Democrats to agree on -- given an unemployment rate of about 8 percent and continued risks to the U.S. economic recovery -- is avoiding sudden fiscal adjustment," the agency said in a statement.

The United States lost its top-tier AAA credit rating from Standard & Poor's last August in the wake of a bruising fight in Congress over lifting the government's debt limit.

"We expect that a sudden fiscal adjustment could occur if all current tax and spending provisions, set to either expire or take effect near the end of 2012, go forward in accordance with current law," S&P said on Friday.

Bush-era tax cuts are to expire on December 31, deep, automatic spending cuts roll out on January 1, 2013, and U.S. borrowing authority must be raised early in the year to avoid the risk of default.

The slate of measures to be faced by a lame duck session of Congress has been dubbed the "fiscal cliff."

A stalemate over how to deal with that combination would likely push the U.S. economy into recession in the first half of next year, the Congressional Budget Office warned last month.

While investors have recently focused on downgrades among European sovereigns - including a significant three-notch downgrade of Spain by Fitch Ratings on Thursday - the fragile U.S. economy has loomed in the background.

With recent disappointing jobs data and concerns about policy paralysis as the presidential election swings into full gear, the health of the U.S. economy remains uncertain.

This week Janet Yellen, the Federal Reserve's second-highest official, laid out the case for the U.S. central bank to provide more support to a fragile economy as financial turmoil in Europe mounts.

S&P said the U.S. economy still faces "significant" risks, adding that "we believe the risk of returning to recession in the U.S. is about 20 percent."

In affirming the rating, S&P cited the resilience of the economy, its monetary credibility and the dollar's status as the world's key reserve currency.

But the country faces "primarily political and fiscal" credit risks, S&P said.

The United States is rated AAA by Fitch Ratings and Aaa by Moody's Investors Service. Both agencies have negative outlooks on the ratings, which means they could act within 12 to 18 months.

Earlier this week Fitch said it would cut its sovereign credit rating for the United States next year if Washington cannot come to grips with its deficits and create a "credible" fiscal consolidation plan.

(Additional reporting by Pamela Niimi; writing by Luciana Lopez; Editing by Gary Crosse, Dan Grebler and David Gregorio)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
MassResident wrote:
The real “Fiscal cliff” is the one the Greeks and Spanish are going over because they kept borrowing until they couldn’t. It is true that we will get a hangover when we stop drinking but the idea that we can avoid one by gradually drinking less is silly. The financial interests in the country want the Feds to keep borrowing and printing money because they benefit from that regardless of the long term consequences for the rest of us.

Jun 09, 2012 9:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
BigBlueFan wrote:
If it happens at all it won’t be in November, that’s for sure.

Jun 09, 2012 11:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
spolly123 wrote:
I don’t think anyone should listen to anything Standard and Poor’s has to say. They had Lehman Brothers rated AAA right before it collapsed, as well as AAA ratings on those bundles of bad debt aka CDOs that caused financial disaster.

Now they want the USA, a nation that’s $15 trillion in debt and dominated by two political parties whose budgets both call for adding more to it over the next decade, to NOT cut spending or increase revenue?!?

Increased revenue and decreased spending are exactly what America needs if it’s ever going to get out from under that enormous debt load. The longer we put it off the worse it gets.

Are we to continue to sacrifice our financial future just because some guys in suits who claim expertise use phrases like “sudden fiscal adjustment?” These are the same people who have already downgraded America’s credit rating from AAA to AA+ (whatever the heck that means) because of our debt and dire fiscal outlook, and in the future they’ll be criticizing us and threatening to cut our rating further for the same reasons.

So we’re darned if we do get our debt under control, and darned if we don’t too? Does this sound absurd to anyone else?

It seems like every time something happens in the European debt crisis, the event that finally starts everybody freaking out and arranging bailouts is a downgrade by a credit rating agency. Several downgrades later and the bailed out European states owe the International Monetary Fund and others around $500 billion. Is that what’s in store for the US too, even more debt shoved down our throats in the form of a massive bailout? All that money leads somewhere: somebody is getting rich(er!) off of these deals.

I give the credit rating agencies a D rating, as in default

Jun 09, 2012 12:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.