Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Republicans renew attacks on Obama administration over leaks

Related Topics

U.S. President Barack Obama walks back to the Oval Office after making remarks about the leaked Afghan war documents in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, July 27, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young

U.S. President Barack Obama walks back to the Oval Office after making remarks about the leaked Afghan war documents in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, July 27, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

WASHINGTON | Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:06pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans on Sunday renewed their attacks on the Obama administration over suspected leaks of classified security information, with one influential senator saying the Justice Department should appoint a special prosecutor to investigate.

Among the government secrets leaked to the media in recent months were reports on U.S. cyber warfare against Iran, procedures for targeting militants for drone attacks and the existence of a double agent who penetrated a militant group in Yemen.

Republicans have also criticized the administration for disclosing details of the Navy SEAL team that killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in a raid on his Pakistan hideout last year.

"Our intelligence people say this is the worst breach they've ever seen," Senator John McCain, senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in an interview on CNN's "State of the Union" program.

"It's very clear that this information had to come from this administration. It couldn't have come from anywhere else," McCain said. "This needs a special counsel - someone who is highly independent of the Justice Department."

While government leaks are a staple of Washington political life, the issue has taken on a special significance ahead of the November 6 election, with some Republicans charging that the leaks appear calculated to boost the President Barack Obama's re-election prospects.

INDEPENDENCE QUESTIONED

Obama has reacted with indignation. "The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive," he said on Friday."

Asked about Obama's remarks, Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said, "I take the president at face value" and that she did not believe information was leaked to help Obama.

"The investigation has to be non-partisan, it's got to be vigorous and it's got to move ahead rapidly," she told the CBS program "Face the Nation."

Attorney General Eric Holder announced late Friday that he had appointed two chief federal prosecutors to lead an investigation into the leaks.

The investigation would be headed by U.S. Attorneys Ronald Machen Jr. of Washington, D.C., and Rod Rosenstein of Maryland, who would be "fully authorized to prosecute criminal violations discovered as a result of their investigation," Holder said.

"Good start, maybe, but we need to find out if they'll have that independence," Mike Rogers, chairman of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, told "Face the Nation."

He said his panel conducted a preliminary review of the "parade of leaks" that raised serious questions.

"Many asked the question, me included: 'Can you have the U.S. attorney, assigned through the attorney general, investigate something that is clearly going to be at the most senior levels of all of the executive branch?" said Rogers.

"Some of the leaks and the public leaks are self-described aides or people who were in the situation room - that's a pretty small but pretty important group of people," he said.

McCain ratcheted up the pressure by calling for a probe by a prosecutor with special powers, independent of the Justice Department.

"I have great respect for the two individuals that were appointed. But this - if it is, and it certainly is, the most egregious breach of intelligence in anybody's memory - that certainly requires a special counsel who is completely independent, someone with credibility ...," he told CNN.

Some special counsels, such as Patrick Fitzgerald who conducted an investigation into the leak of the identity of a covert CIA operative that led to the conviction of a senior aide to former Vice President Dick Cheney on obstruction and perjury charges, have been accused of conducting witch-hunts.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
IntoTheTardis wrote:
Yawn. Just more election year politics. There’s nothing to it.

Jun 10, 2012 4:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
usagadfly wrote:
Why was no Special Prosecutor sent to find out who led the charge of lies about “weapons of mass destruction” that cost tens of thousands of American lives? Now that was a crime, one of many. But then, all that was in a good Republican cause, was it not?

Still no investigation of the thousands of liars who got us into a war in Iraq. How many of those same liars are now leading us by the nose to Iran and Pakistan? Surely our “honest” and “public spirited” Republican lawmakers would like to have that sordid, dirty, treasonous pile of horse dung cleaned up? No? And why not?

Jun 10, 2012 5:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eideard wrote:
Chickenhawks and warlovers populate this particular waste of political space. The Republican Party has become the party of useless whining.

Jun 10, 2012 5:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.