Senate tax chief warns of dangerous fiscal path

WASHINGTON Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:31pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is on a "dangerous path" that could lead to a European-style fiscal crisis, the Senate's top tax legislator warned on Monday, while calling for more tax revenue and ending corporate incentives to shift profits and jobs overseas.

Democrat Max Baucus urged fellow lawmakers to resolve by the end of 2012 a host of "crucial spending and tax decisions" that will arise immediately after the November 6 presidential and congressional elections.

The remarks by the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee were short on specifics and did not lay out a clear working agenda, but they reflected growing urgency on Capitol Hill.

After the elections, a wave of fiscal issues will hit Congress, including the expiration of temporary tax cuts made under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, huge budget cuts ordered last year, and what to do about various tax breaks.

"Deficits and debt are not just a spending problem," Baucus said in a speech to the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank. "We simply don't raise enough revenue."

Decisions on these and other questions will come at a time when the United States, struggling to grow out of a financial crisis and recession, has run federal budget deficits topping $1 trillion for three straight years and is on track for a fourth.

At the same time, protracted fiscal crises in Europe are casting a shadow over the sluggish U.S. economic recovery.

Action on a deficit-reduction plan and tax code overhaul has been put off over the last two years as Democrats and Republicans have been unable to overcome deep divisions, with Democrats seeking tax increases on the wealthy and Republicans focusing on domestic spending cuts without any tax increases.

"We're on a dangerous path. If we don't act, it could lead towards fiscal crisis, like some European countries," Baucus said.

Obama, a Democrat, and lawmakers from both parties say they favor cleaning up the tax code in a broad overhaul, which most define as cutting marginal tax rates while trimming tax breaks that favor individual groups and industries.

Baucus said he has been in bipartisan talks to find a way forward on an end-of-the-year deal to avoid the fiscal cliff. Meetings are focused on two proposals with some bipartisan backing, including one recommended by the president's fiscal commission, known as Simpson-Bowles.

While Simpson-Bowles failed to garner enough backing to trigger a Congressional vote, and Obama did not embrace it, comments by Baucus suggest it may be gaining new currency.

Baucus said that plan and one offered by the Bipartisan Policy Center were "rough starting points that people tend to agree with."

The Simpson-Bowles plan outlined several options, including one trimming the current tax brackets from six to three and cutting the top 35 percent individual tax rate to between 24 percent and 27 percent.

That proposal also limits the mortgage interest and health care deductions, converting them to credits.


Echoing other Democrats' views, Baucus said any tax code rewrite must raise revenue, a position that is at odds with the current Republican negotiating stance. "Mathematically there is no escape," Baucus said, without laying out any details.

Separately, former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert and former House Democratic Majority Leader Dick Gephardt called for a bipartisan deal on how much revenue the government should raise. After that, tax rates would be sketched in to fit the amount of revenues needed.

"Only after a framework has been set, Congress should debate the rates themselves," they said in a Financial Times opinion column on Monday.

House Republicans have called for cutting individual and corporate rates from top rates of 35 percent to 25 percent.

Republicans are also backing a type of "fast-track" mechanism that could force action on tax reforms if Congress failed to act before a set deadline, though they are still working out the details.

Baucus said that option should be considered.

The moderate Democrat from Montana has been holding hearings on tax reform for more than a year. He is up for re-election in 2014.

Several experts said they were encouraged that Baucus did not lay out clear markers, suggesting he is eager to forge a bipartisan deal. "People shouldn't sit around making lists of what they would not do," said Bill Thomas, former chairman of the House tax writing panel.


The U.S. corporate tax system is known as a "worldwide" system, requiring companies to pay taxes on income earned abroad that is brought back to the United States. Businesses say such a system actually encourages them to move operations offshore and keep profits abroad to avoid tax.

Many companies advocate a "territorial" system, where income earned outside the United States is free of U.S. tax and subject only to the local jurisdiction's tax.

Baucus, in his speech, noted that other countries "have shifted to territorial systems to keep their companies from moving overseas. And they have tougher rules against shifting profits overseas."

He said that, under the worldwide system, "we have weakened protections against shifting income to tax havens."

That cheered investment analyst Jim Lucier, who said it seemed Baucus was seeking middle ground on corporate taxes.

"He is clearly trying to straddle the differences," Lucier said.

(Editing by Eric Beech, Gunna Dickson and Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (19)
DedKitty wrote:
If Mitt Romney wins, he will raise taxes and all the GOP will be fine with it.

Jun 11, 2012 1:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Sensibility wrote:
This is actually very encouraging. Finally, leading legislators from BOTH parties are preaching fiscal sanity, even if the majority in both parties are still miles apart. Just recognizing that something has to be done is a step in the right direction.

It’s really not that hard. You cut defense, close tax loopholes especially for corporations, and lower income taxes across the board. Republicans can bill these changes as “spending cuts”, Democrats can call them “tax increases”, and both sides can claim victory. The extremes in either party will not be happy, but this is called compromise.

Medicare and Medicaid are harder to reform, largely thanks to the regressive “Obamacare”, but that can be done as well. The Supreme Court may yet give Congress a running start. If only we had a President that cared as much about leading as he does about campaigning. Maybe in November, we’ll get a capable person in that role. Here’s hoping.

Jun 11, 2012 2:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JLWR wrote:
I am not an Obama fan or a fan of either party for that matter, but the GOP’s fiscal agenda is the worst possible scenario and is the exact opposite of what this country needs. Because the GOP are simply advocates for the rich and powerful only and because they also want to privitize everything (guess who has all the money to buy it??) – for these reasons alone, I will not be voting for any GOP. GOP are self serving financial vampires. Every aspect of ther fiscal agenda helps the rich and leave the middle class and poor with nothing but bills and taxes that go to the rich. The GOP fiscal agend is an absolute outrage for any society.

Jun 11, 2012 3:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.