Climate change will boost number of West's wildfires

WASHINGTON Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:03pm EDT

1 of 2. A huge plume of smoke rises from Colorado's High Park Fire, with dozens of homes visible in the foreground about 15 miles northwest of Fort Collins June 11, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

Related Video


Colorado wildfire rages on

Tue, Jun 12 2012

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Climate change will make wildfires in the West, like those now raging in parts of Colorado and New Mexico, more frequent over the next 30 years, researchers reported on Tuesday.

More broadly, almost all of North America and most of Europe will see an increase in wildfires by the year 2100, the scientists wrote in the journal Ecosphere, a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

The U.S. Southwest - Arizona, New Mexico and Texas - is the fastest-warming region of the United States, and this warming trend will worsen droughts, alter growing seasons and increase wildfire risk, the non-profit research organization Climate Central reported.

On Tuesday, 20 large wildfires were burning in eight Western states, from Idaho and Wyoming to California and Arizona, according to the U.S. Forest Service. A map of active fires is online at .

Using satellite-based fire records and 16 different climate-change models, an international team of researchers found that while wildfires will increase in many temperate zones due to rising temperatures, fire risk may actually decrease around the equator, especially in tropical rainforests, because of increased rainfall.

"In the long run, we found what most fear - increasing fire activity across large areas of the planet," said lead author Max Moritz of the University of California-Berkeley.

"But the speed and extent to which some of these changes may happen is surprising. These abrupt changes in fire patterns not only affects people's livelihoods, but also they add stress to native plants and animals that are already struggling to adapt to habitat loss," Moritz said in a statement.

Co-author Katharine Hayhoe of Texas Tech University said this study gives a unique global perspective on recent fire patterns and their relationship to climate.

Climate scientists, including those affiliated with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, have projected that more frequent wildfires would be likely in a warming world. Other effects of global warming include more severe storms, floods and droughts, these scientists have said.


In a separate study, researchers approved of the intentional setting of controlled fires, a wildfire-fighting technique that has sometimes raised questions about its impact on wildlife.

Writing in the June issue of the journal BioScience, researchers at the University of California-Berkeley reviewed two decades of research on the ecological impact of cutting forest wildfire risk, especially in the southern Sierra Mountains, where precipitation was at half of normal levels.

The idea behind so-called controlled burns is to reduce the amount of fuel that would feed a wildfire. The new study found that these fuel-reducing fires do not cause substantial harm.

"The few effects we did see were usually transient," Berkeley's Scott Stephens said in a statement. "Based upon what we've found, forest managers can increase the scale and pace of necessary fuels treatments without worrying about unintended ecological consequences."

A warming climate makes the carbon dioxide stored in forest soils decompose faster, sending more climate-warming carbon into the atmosphere, researchers at the University of California-Irvine and elsewhere reported Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

(Reporting by Deborah Zabarenko; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
ErnieScarr wrote:
I love it, use a title like climate change instead of Global warming. That way if it rains, or if its dry you are always right. A better article would be titled “Fear Mongering brings more money to tree hugging groups”.

Jun 12, 2012 9:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
mbgodofwar wrote:
Money should be used if they expect to persuade anyone more than environmental groups. (E.g. “save gas/money by taking public transportation/walking/car-pooling/biking, etc” vs “save the trees, maaaan by foregoing modern transportation” or “buy local to support local/regional businesses and save money by doing it” (well, if labor costs didn’t hike up our costs so much) vs “the treeeees and pannnndas, maaaan need our help, maaaan so like don’t use a cellphone or portable media player.”
Yep, the climate scientists can always be right because we KNOW that humidity influences fire, whether it’s caused by factories in China or the US, or Earth’s proximity to the Sun, and it’s orbit around the galactic center.

Jun 12, 2012 12:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
gregbrew56 wrote:
I love it. 99% of the planet’s climate scientists, using repeatable, verifiable research and data have concluded that the Earth’s climate is changing at an alarming and unprecedented rate, likely because of human activities. There is no “controversy” among scientists.

Yet deniers like Ernie “know better” based on ignorance and repeatedly heard agenda-based dogma-driven propaganda.

Too funny!

Jun 12, 2012 2:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.