Sponsored Links

Weak house prices drag family wealth: Fed

Related Topics

A home is seen padlocked and boarded up in Brentwood, New York February 10, 2012. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

A home is seen padlocked and boarded up in Brentwood, New York February 10, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

WASHINGTON | Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:18pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Americans suffered a record decline in wealth between 2007 and 2010 as home values tumbled, according to a Federal Reserve report on Monday that underscored the severity of the recent recession.

The median family's net worth dropped 38.8 percent during the three-year period, the Fed said in its latest report on changes in U.S. Family Finances, derived from a survey of consumer finances. Fed economists told reporters that this was the biggest drop in net worth since the survey started in 1989.

The median net worth, which is the value of assets minus debt, plunged to $77,300 in 2010 from $126,400 in 2007. Net worth in 2010 was at levels last seen in 1992.

"Although declines in the values of financial assets or business were important factors for some families, the decreases in median net worth appear to have been driven most strongly by a broad collapse in house prices," the Fed said.

The survey's findings shine a harsh light on the devastation inflicted on the economy by the 2007-09 recession and could help to explain the frustratingly slow pace of the recovery.

The housing market's collapse was at the core of the recession, during which the economy contracted nearly 5.1 percent between the third quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2009, with the unemployment rate rising 4.5 percentage points to 9.5 percent.

"Housing was of greater importance than financial assets for the wealth position of most families," the Fed said.

The survey found that the decline in median net worth was large for families in groups where housing was a larger share of assets, such as families headed by someone 35 to 44 years old and families in the West region.

"A substantial part of the declines observed in net worth over the 2007-10 period can be associated with decreases in the level of unrealized capital gains on families' assets," the Fed said.

The share of total assets of all families attributable to unrealized capital gains from real estate, businesses, stocks, or mutual funds fell 11.6 percentage points to 24.5 percent in 2010, it said.

While the overall level of debt owed by families was unchanged, debt as a percentage of assets rose to 16.4 percent in 2010 from 14.8 percent in 2007 because the value of the underlying assets, especially housing, decreased faster.

The share of families carrying a credit card balance fell 6.7 percentage points to 39.4 percent in 2010. The median balance fell 16.1 percent to $2,600 in 2010 from $3,100 in 2007.

The proportion of families with debt payments greater than 40 percent of their income was nearly unchanged between 2007 and 2010.

(This story has been refiled to correct median net worth to $77,300 in 2010, not $77.3 trillion, and corrects to $126,000 in 2007, not $126 trillion in 3rd paragraph.)

(Reporting By Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
aln0110 wrote:
And of course they won’t do anything about it except give more of my tax dollars to the banks.

Jun 11, 2012 10:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
WWBD wrote:
Yes, U.S. household wealth has dropped 38.8% from a fantasy value that never really existed in the first place. We need to stop using the bubble years as the “norm.” THEY were the aberration, not our present situation.

Jun 11, 2012 10:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Gall0wz wrote:
Yeah its ’cause the banks in their infinite wisdom accepted tax payer bailout money while kicking people out of their houses. The banks would have done a lot better if they had tried to keep people in their homes and work out new deals with them. Now, the banks are overburdened with owning all these homes they’ve foreclosed on. At the same time, even though they got their bailout money, they are refusing to lend. Thus, the houses sit vacant and un-maintained. As a result, the property values of surrounding properties drop and place more homeowners underwater. Then, when the bank finally finds a predatory landlord to sell the house to, they unload it for less than 10 percent what it should be worth…. which again… pushes surrounding property values down even further.

These bankers are buying our government off with their lobbiests who exchange favors with our elected officials just so they can get their corporate written legislation passed and donate money to their superPAC.

Jun 11, 2012 11:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.