Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Germany, Italy urge funding for missile program

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:02pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - German and Italian officials warned U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday that their plans to cut off funding for a ground-based NATO missile defense program built by Lockheed Martin Corp would endanger U.S. ties with their countries.

Italian Defense Minister Giampaolo Di Paola urged U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to ensure continued funding for the Medium Extended Air and Missile Defense System (MEADS)program given its importance to NATO's future plans and transatlantic cooperation and collaboration.

German legislator Ernst Reinhard Beck said in a series of e letters to U.S. lawmakers that withholding funding for the program "undermines the longstanding and trustful MEADS partnership" and would risk wasting hundreds of millions of euros already invested in the air missile system.

Three congressional committees have scrapped the Obama administration's request for $400 million to complete funding for testing of the new missile defense program, which is jointly financed by the United States, Italy and Germany.

Di Paola urged Panetta to intervene with the fourth committee, the Senate Appropriations Committee, that must still vote on the measure. "We hope and expect that the United States would live up to its (Memorandum of Understanding) commitment," he said in a copy of the letter obtained by Reuters.

Beck said failure by the U.S. Congress to fund the final phase of work on the program would be "perceived by Germany as breaking our transatlantic agreement and memorandum of understanding." It would mark the first time that one of the three partners had terminated a contract and endangered their special relationship, he said.

"The U.S. Congress must be very aware that a pull-out on its final MEADS commitment has broad implications and it will have long-term impacts to other multinational cooperative projects," Beck said in the letters.

The unilateral withdrawal from the joint project would "probably cause significant financial and national security relationship challenge," he wrote.

COULD HARM RELATIONS

The White House has threatened to veto fiscal 2013 defense spending bills over the issue. It has warned lawmakers that failure to fund MEADS would have negative ramifications for U.S. ties to Italy and Germany and "could harm our relationship with our Allies on a much broader basis, including future multinational cooperative projects."

MEADS was intended to replace the U.S. Army's aging Patriot air and missile defense system and has been in development for more than a decade.

Washington announced last year that it would stop funding the program after fiscal year 2013, calling it unaffordable in the current budget climate.

But the Pentagon said it would still fund testing of the program in fiscal 2013 to ensure development of a meaningful capability for Germany and Italy, and to maintain a future option for the United States.

U.S. lawmakers like Senator John McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, argue that Washington should not spend any more money on a missile defense system it no longer intends to use.

They say Congress told the Pentagon in the fiscal 2012 defense authorization law to either terminate the program or find a way to complete it for the $390 million appropriated for fiscal 2012.

(Reporting By Andrea Shalal-Esa)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
SyriasTruth wrote:
I’d rather see a fully functional updated missile program all across Europe and in the US, than to see the US Congress waste it on it’s common pork belly programs. There is so much waste in the US budget, let’s finish the missile program to at least get the updated protection we need. I have to say, Iran is working on nuclear weapons development, with Russia and China likely to sell them a missile system to deliver their warheads.

Looking ahead…the missiles in Europe can help knock any such Iranian missile attach out…before it gets to the US or other nations.

400 million is not that much…compared to the bailout we did for the banks …just stupid stuff at the banks we all got to pay for.

Keep the missile systems…quit bailing out reckless business and financial companies.

Jun 13, 2012 10:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
If other countries want this, they should pay for it. What do these countries do for us and to make threats as relations will be frayed if we do not provide money. I think they should be gone and worry about their own defense.

Instead, spend the money where it belongs which is on infrastructure , education and creation of good paying jobs. Either tell the wealthy that the free ride is over or just allow the game that is currently at play do it for us.

This is a joke of an article and to remotely consider this is a clear indicator of a disconnect from reality. People need to drop the divisive issues and work together as Americans, not fund the planets defenses but to work towards one nation, indivisible and move forward fixing our own problems.

Lastly, your comparison of bailing out banks and spending money on a missile defense system is laughable. In both cases you have entitled people who think they are owed something. The investment institutions that hedged bad bets against their Customers deposits. In turn to prevent a civil war, the bailout was to return that money to it’s rightful owners and no one was the wiser. Though the ignorant rant the bail out did nothing. Try turning off the television, removing the thorn from your own eye and look around at what has happened / is happening.

Ignore the divisive issues and know it is in our differences that make us stronger. Look past your neighbor’s flaws to find the ally waiting there and put an end to sham programs that funnel taxpayer dollars to programs to countries that are only our friend as long as we pay them to be. We do not need their friendship and let them protect themselves.

Jun 13, 2012 11:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
boreal wrote:
Europeans would be prudent building that missile fence against Russian, Chinese, North Korean, Iranian missiles; and just to be on the safe side keep an eye on potential Israeli missiles too. Just in case.

Jun 13, 2012 11:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.